Ponting Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Now that TrueCrypt isn't secure anymore,what are you using for complete disk encryption? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantasy Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Try AxCrypt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurobyn Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 my 2 cents DO NOT USE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ponting Posted June 11, 2014 Author Share Posted June 11, 2014 my 2 cents DO NOT USE.What? :unsure: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramjade Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Just use version 7.1a. If it is good enough for Edward Snowden, it is good enough for us. That was the last, final version which was not compromise in any way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mazigh Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 https://veracrypt.codeplex.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnakeMasteR Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Just use version 7.1a. If it is good enough for Edward Snowden, it is good enough for us. That was the last, final version which was not compromise in any way.Yeah, it should be that version that seems to be not altered but however, it would be a good idea digging a bit deeper and use even more non-recent versions. And to be honest, it makes 0 sense using anything other than TrueCrypt because if you think you are more secure with alternatives then, dream on, especially for encryption, you can use the most secure encryption method in the world, if your password is like 12345678901011121314151617181920.... you can't blame anyone for own stupidity and weakening the functionality that depends on it.You will always risk getting your shit decrypted, no matter what you use to encrypt it. TrueCrypt's encryption is secure and undefeated. It's good enough to hide your fap videos. You need to have some serious shit going on, if anyone with proper hardware wants to technically decrypt your physical medias and don't think it is the easiest and fastest thing already for any government, TrueCrypt is hard to decrypt if used correctly and it takes a while making progress.No matter what you use, closed source, open source, private source and custom builds, no matter what features are promised and how much software says it can do for you regarding privacy and security, if there are technical reasons or incompatibilities with TrueCrypt 7.1a and below, that are the only reasons to not use it anymore. But only my opinion. I also can't see any real alternative to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avmad Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 https://diskcryptor.net/wiki/Main_PageSeems to be a popular replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackchildcx Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 Symantec.Encryption.Desktop.Professional.v10.3.2.Multilingualverry advanced solution and serial/fixed...NOT patched/cracked!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knowledge-Spammer Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 i use GiliSoft_Full_Disk_Encryption its good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fallon Posted June 14, 2014 Share Posted June 14, 2014 Axcrypt or DiskCryptor, or another Open Source solution.In principle Open Source is the best guarantee that you will get your data back in case of a disaster.(a tad more important than terrorists stumbling over evil plans for santa). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dodel Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 In principle Open Source is the best guarantee that you will get your data back in case of a disaster.Not quite sure how this works ?, it's encryption software, so no-one but yourself should be able to recover it, that's the reason behind the app!.What I think you mean, is because it's OS, more devs can trawl the source code and potentially spot bugs / back doors / loop holes which could have been coded by another dev in a fork of the app.Edit: I use Axcrypt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fallon Posted June 15, 2014 Share Posted June 15, 2014 In principle Open Source is the best guarantee that you will get your data back in case of a disaster.Not quite sure how this works ?, it's encryption software, so no-one but yourself should be able to recover it, that's the reason behind the app!.What I think you mean, is because it's OS, more devs can trawl the source code and potentially spot bugs / back doors / loop holes which could have been coded by another dev in a fork of the app.Edit: I use Axcrypt.About the encryption part, you are right. And your second option is good thinking - in this case not mine.When using Open Source, you can expect some help for eternity. For example when the encrypted stuff has to be opened 30 years from now. In case of a proprietary program, it may have been sold and gone belly up by then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saley Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Use Rohos Mini Drive. It is freeware, very simple interface. Designed to create encrypted volumes on USB flash drives, but, it is possible to encrypt hard drive as well. Find this loophole! In case of damaging, disk restore function is available.In addition there is a small application, Rohos Disk Browser, that can work without administrative rights, can create non-limited volumes and create disks inside media files. It can create real hidden partitions, where another applications can not have access. And even Windows can not format it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saley Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Rohos Mini drive can hide user profile in Skype, Chrome and Mozilla firefox. So, your web history and passwords became protected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CODYQX4 Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 Don't use Symantec, it is extremely likely backdoored.I'd probably keep using TrueCrypt or something at the very least that is Open Source if that is a concern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesbond Posted August 13, 2014 Share Posted August 13, 2014 closed source is a no-go when it comes to encryption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.