Jump to content

is a 320 kbps rate better than Itunes quality?


hamedjoon

Recommended Posts

is a 320 kbps rate better than Itunes quality?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 5
  • Views 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Dodel

    1

  • hamedjoon

    1

  • lordnsane

    1

  • mikso

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Only ALAC (Lossless) beats 320 Kbps.

AAC 256 Kbps and lower have poorer quality over 320 Kbps. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


As iTunes 256 kbps m4a (AAC) rivals 320 kbps mp3...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 2 weeks later...

well i think AAC is better, not that the quality is superior, but from what i have heard, AAC (1997) uses far better encoding algos than mp3 (1995), so even 128kbps AAC is enough for adequate quality, so it saves much more space, and hence more practical than 320kbps or even lossless audio.

Found this on youtube a few months back, an ABX testing, which will clear your doubts:

More from the same guy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...