anuseems Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 (edited) Microsoft (MSFT) is said to have offered its Windows Phone mobile OS free of charge to two India-based OEMs, perhaps signaling the vendor is willing to forgo licensing fees for a greater stake in emerging markets.The Times of India reported that India-based phone makers Lava and Karbonn—part of a group of nine newcomers to the platform Microsoft disclosed at the recent Mobile World Congress—committed to develop Windows Phone-based handsets only when the vendor agreed to waive its licensing fees. The Times relied on industry insiders privy to Microsoft’s negotiations with the Indian handset makers who confided the deals got done only when the vendor broke with its longstanding policy and elected not to charge for its OS.Both Lava and Karbonn already produce Google (GOOG) Android-based smartphones. Google doesn’t charge device makers to license Android but instead gains revenue from ads and media sales. Might deep-pocketed Microsoft be trying to beat deep-pocketed Google at its own game? Maybe, but offering mobile device makers—at least those unconvinced of Windows Phone’s market strength—the maneuverability to experiment with the platform to see how much sales it drives is far a more significant move. That alone is classically un-Microsoft-ish.The chief questions surrounding the strategy are, Will it encourage hardware OEMs to make more Windows Phone devices and lure developers to both platforms? Or will it be seen as a marketing ploy and fall flat?Without question, Microsoft recently has upped its Windows Phone game, collaborating with mobile chip maker Qualcomm (QCOM) on a new building-block reference design that includes hardware, software and development tools to pave the way for OEMs and ODMs to produce low-cost Windows Phone-equipped smartphones for growth markets. The design platform, which is anchored by Qualcomm’s low-end targeted Snapdragon 200 and 400 series apps processors, aims to allow hardware makers to save on engineering costs, allowing them to focus on differentiating their offerings based on apps and services.In addition, Microsoft has opened a Windows Hardware Partner Portal to offer information to hardware device makers that might convince them to develop on the Windows Phone platform, including services, the app catalog and features.Word first surfaced late last year that Microsoft was kicking around the idea of giving OEM device makers Windows Phone for free, forgoing the licensing revenue that comes with those platforms in exchange for improving the tilt of the battlefield a bit more in its favor.Source: Link Edited March 21, 2014 by Lite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banned Posted March 15, 2014 Share Posted March 15, 2014 I wouldn't switch from XP to Windows 8 if they paid me. It's already free to any noob who knows how to use bittorrent.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 (edited) Headline does not match the text, no where does it mention anything relating to xp Edited March 16, 2014 by ricktendo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Win7nerd Posted March 17, 2014 Share Posted March 17, 2014 id switch to xp TO windows 7 NOT windows 8 but im on windows 8.1 with warranty so im screwed lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 (edited) Only one member seems to have read the full post and the (linked) article - the title of this topic has been completely misquoted. :thumbsdown:Edit:This topic which was started on 16th March 2014 and promptly reported with one member also pointing out the discrepancy, has just now been corrected for the erroneous title after a good 5 days (after being reported again, today.) <_< Edited March 21, 2014 by dcs18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ricktendo Posted March 21, 2014 Share Posted March 21, 2014 (edited) Only one member seems to have read the full post and the (linked) article - the title of this topic has been completely misquoted. :thumbsdown: Edit: This topic which was started on 16th March 2014 and promptly reported with one member also pointing out the discrepancy, has just now been corrected for the erroneous title after a good 5 days (after being reported again, today.) <_<I dont understand why some poeple think its perfectly fine to just copy and paste stuff they find on a blog or reddit, if I want to read those stories I go to a blog or reddit (IMO its all about getting the post count up)... Now give me software news and cut the other crap out Edited March 21, 2014 by ricktendo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts