Jump to content

Feds Drop Most Charges Against Anonymous Spokesman


Reefa

Recommended Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eky-q9CE_co

Federal prosecutors in Texas have moved to drop all but one of the 13 fraud charges against Barrett Brown, a writer and former spokesman for Anonymous.

In a motion to dismiss (.PDF), the government today offered no reason for the move. Brown still faces a single charge of possession of stolen credit card numbers with intent to defraud, and a separate indictment for threatening an FBI agent.

The move comes a day after Brown’s defense attorneys filed a 48-page motion to dismiss the charges against him, on grounds that the government failed to substantiate that Brown had committed a crime.

Brown, whose prosecution threatened to become a First Amendment test case, was charged with 13 counts centered around a link he posted in a chat room that pointed to a file containing data stolen from the intelligence firm Stratfor, or Strategic Forecasting. The data, stolen by Jeremy Hammond, a member of the loosely affiliated Anonymous collective, included company emails as well as credit card numbers belonging to subscribers of Stratfor’s service.

Brown didn’t steal the data but simply copied a hyperlink from one public chatroom and reposted it to another. Twelve of those charges accused him of aggravated identity theft for possessing and trafficking in stolen authentication features — which authorities identified as the three- and four-digit card verification value (CVV) that is printed on the back of the cards.

The thirteenth charge, for access device fraud, accused Brown of illegally possessing the stolen cards — presumably cards that were found on his computer after he downloaded the Stratfor cache himself.

Brown’s attorneys, in their motion to dismiss (.pdf), had argued that the link B]rown posted went to data that someone else had published and that charging him for simply linking to content was a First Amendment violation.

They also argued that the trafficking and identity theft charges were misapplied since the CVV was not actually an authentication feature. An authentication feature is defined by the law as something that a card issuer uses to verify the authenticity of a card — such as a hologram — to ensure that someone is not using a fraudulently produced card. But the CVV is actually a security feature used to verify that the person making a purchase possesses the card (or possesses the CVV number) and is therefore presumed to be authorized to make the purchase.

Brown has been in custody since he was arrested in 2012 while he was in the middle of an online chat. In addition to the access device fraud charge, Brown also faces separate obstruction charges related to his effort to conceal his laptop from investigators who searched his apartment and his mother’s home. He also faces charges over threats he made online to an FBI agent.

Homepage image: FreeBarrettbrown

Source

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Views 577
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Reefa

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...