Jump to content

Waiting for a 1TB SSD below $1 per GB? Crucial says wait no more


nsane.forums

Recommended Posts

nsane.forums

New M500 drives are out, topping out at 960GB for $599 MSRP.

Crucial announced in a press release this morning that it has begun selling its latest round of consumer-grade solid-state disks (SSDs), the M500. The 2.5-inch SATA III SSDs are the follow-up to Crucial's M4 SSDs, which are a pretty popular choice for people adding SSDs to existing systems (I think I have four or five M4s scattered in computers around my house).

The drives use 20nm MLC NAND sourced from Micron (and if you're not sure what MLC NAND is, we've got a great SSD primer right here), along with a Micron-provided SSD controller. Performance for the M500 drives is what you'd expect from a drive in this class: sequential read and write speeds of 500MB per second and 400MB per second.

But the big news about the announcement is the capacities. The M500 is available in standard pedestrian capacities of 120GB and 240GB, as well as a large capacity of 480GB, but the top-end SKU is the exciting one: 960GB for just $599.99 (62¢ per raw GB). The MSRPs for the smaller capacities are $129.99 for the 120GB (about $1 per raw GB), $219.99 for the 240GB (about 91¢ per raw GB), and $399.99 for the 480GB (about 83¢ per raw GB).


RjjWVNw.jpg

A 960GB SSD for that price is a heck of a deal; a quick scan on NewEgg and other retailers doesn't really turn up anything in remotely the same category. Some OEMs are including big SSDs in their offerings—Apple famously includes a 768GB SSD in its latest round of iMacs that adds a whopping $900 to the computer's price—but this is far and away the least-expensive big SSD you can get.

Or could get, anyway—the SKUs are showing up at various places, including Amazon and NewEgg, but Amazon is out of stock and NewEgg has a $50 markup on the price over the MSRP.

Once the release furor settles down, though, this is excellent news. Crucial's M4 has a good reputation for reliability, avoiding a lot of the pitfalls and blowouts that have plagued its competition (like the much-lamented OCZ Vertex lines). Far and away the most common refrain in the comments when we post SSD-related stories is "Bah, who cares, wake me up when they're 1TB."

Wake up.


view.gifView: Original Article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3
  • Views 937
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

Sounds like a good step forward. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MidnightDistortions

It's looking really well for SSD's. Still need to get one for my laptop and i7 desktop. For now HDD's work well for me especially for just basic storage, having a few that are slowing down due to age but otherwise doing alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see efforts concentrated on the 125 GB SSDs keeping quality in mind instead of diverting focus to the higher capacity which at the most cheapest prices will anyways be beyond the reach of the common man.

If all Developers produce just the 125 GB variants, it would suit the economies of mass scale production for most of us translating into much more reasonable rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...