Administrator DKT27 Posted February 21, 2013 Administrator Share Posted February 21, 2013 It's official: there is no need to worry about a patent that stops consoles from playing second-hand games -- it isn't intended for Sony's next console. For anyone who was concerned about Sony's patent that would tie games to consoles, stop your fretting. Your PlayStation 4 will not contain that technology. Speaking to Eurogamer, Sony Worldwide Studios boss Shuhei Yoshida attempted to lay to rest any concerns that the just-announced console would prevent people from playing second-hand games. Discussing the idea of restricting the play of used games, Yoshida touched upon the expectation of customers: that once you have bought a physical disc, you should be able to use it how and where you will. "That's the general expectation by consumers," said Yoshida. "They purchase physical form, they want to use it everywhere, right? So that's my expectation." The Sony executive continued: "So, used games can play on PS4. How is that?" That will do just fine, thank you. It seems that the recent discovery of a new Sony patent for an "Electronic Content Processing System" and "Use Apparatus" would link individual game disc "tags" with matching user accounts is completely unrelated to the console. The security system works by attaching contactless RF "tags" to individual games, which then would only work if the account and game match up -- so games purchased by another user would potentially be prevented from functioning. Rumors, reports and the patent discovery meant a tense wait for PlayStation fans to find out if this security protocol would be in place, but as gaming firm analyst Michael Pachter noted, it seems the benefits of using such technology does not outweigh potentially alienating consumers and therefore lowering sales rates. Pachter commented last month that Sony would see very little benefit from preventing used games from being played, writing:Sony would be materially hurt if its console blocked used games and competitor consoles from Microsoft and Nintendo did not. The Wii U is already on the market with no used game prohibition, and we believe that Microsoft would take advantage of Sony's prospective decision to block used games by marketing that its own next generation did NOT block used games. So, take heart, used games will work on the PS4.:view: View: Original Article Your turn, Microsoft. :bag: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidnightDistortions Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Thank God, even though i prefer PC's for my gaming there's most likely a few game series i like that don't always go PC. This is good to know. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidnightDistortions Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 I also like to add that i prefer buying my games new, not used. Unless the game can't be found new or the used game is by far cheaper then a new copy then i buy used. Otherwise i always go for a new copy, zero scratches & everything is intact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted February 25, 2013 Author Administrator Share Posted February 25, 2013 I also like to add that i prefer buying my games new, not used. Unless the game can't be found new or the used game is by far cheaper then a new copy then i buy used. Otherwise i always go for a new copy, zero scratches & everything is intact.I've never owned any newer consoles, so I might be shooting in the dark, but from what I can understand, this used games thing is more of a anti-piracy measure than an used-game one. I could be wrong, but that's what I believe all this is all about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MidnightDistortions Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 It could be a combination of both. Well that and since high graphic games are more expensive now. It used to be $49 for most games but they're now at $59. It could be piracy, but i myself used to buy plenty of games & with the economy i'm forced to choose more wisely what games i buy. I don't even shop for games anymore, let alone music or movies. These companies automatically assume people are downloading instead of buying. I think they should do what they can to stop piracy but suing individuals for downloading and trying to lock the disk to one system is just ridiculous. Anti-recording/copying mechanisms on ruin it for those who simply want to back up their media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted February 25, 2013 Author Administrator Share Posted February 25, 2013 If I'd be in the position in US where such laws are written, I'd completely ban any form of lock-down or DRM. But no, these idiots want their pockets full and their citizen's empty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.