nsane.forums Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 Going against its initial hopes, Mozilla starts adding support for the patent-encumbered H.264 video compression standard. Perhaps it'll get revenge through WebRTC. Mozilla, which bowed to the market power of the H.264 video compression technology last year, now has built support for the patent-encumbered standard into the Nightly version of Firefox on Windows 7. Mozilla can't actually ship H.264 in its open-source product because of the patent licensing requirements, so it decided instead to adapt Firefox to draw on H.264 support built into newer operating systems. The first step is done -- if not fully tested and debugged -- on Windows 7, according to a Mozilla blog post today. Mozilla had thrown its weight behind VP8, a royalty-free codec from Google, but it hasn't caught on nearly as widely as H.264, and Google scrapped a promise to drop H.264 from Chrome. Two years ago, Google said it would drop the support "in the next couple of months." Part of H.264's clout stems from power-efficient decoding enabled by chips in just about every smartphone on the market today. On personal computers, Adobe Systems' Flash Player often handles video decoding, but it's barred from iOS. Perhaps Mozilla will get its revenge through WebRTC, a nascent standard for real-time video or audio chat on the Web. The new Nightly version also has WebRTC support enabled by default. It's not clear what codec WebRTC-based video chat will use, but it's possible VP8 could be specified as mandatory to implement for the standard. A March showdown over WebRTC video could settle the matter, but it's also possible no codec at all will be specified, which is what happened with HTML video built into Web pages. WebRTC faces a big challenge in the form of Microsoft, which prefers a lower-level approach it calls CU-RTC-Web. Microsoft believes WebRTC is difficult to implement, but one of its interoperability criticisms was made obsolete with the arrival of Chrome and Firefox that can communicate using WebRTC. The new Firefox Nightly version also is adapted for the touch-centric interface of Windows 8. The raw Nightly version of Firefox includes the latest patches; every six weeks it becomes Firefox Aurora, then Firefox beta, then the final release of Firefox. View: Original Article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alhaitham Posted February 20, 2013 Share Posted February 20, 2013 thanks for the news Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowx Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 Kyuubi :win: go for it mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xpmule Posted February 21, 2013 Share Posted February 21, 2013 Sounds good but not sure how useful it is.. i've never once needed my browser to play one.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted February 21, 2013 Administrator Share Posted February 21, 2013 Sounds good but not sure how useful it is.. i've never once needed my browser to play one..You watch youtube or any other videos? Now play them in HTML5 mode, it will play in shitty WEBM format, now it will play in H.264 format. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xpmule Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 yeah you know what when i commented i was thinking about containers not codecs lolyou made a good point ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted February 22, 2013 Administrator Share Posted February 22, 2013 yeah you know what when i commented i was thinking about containers not codecs lolyou made a good point ! :)I myself mixed things up in above post. I'm comparing containers to codecs. :P WebM is a container, H.264 is a codec. WebM uses VP8 codec, H.264 normally uses MP4 container. But, what I've said remains the same / correct though. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xpmule Posted February 22, 2013 Share Posted February 22, 2013 Ya i think i understood what you meant and not about arguing about details like people do so much on the net ;)I hope it shows i TRY and understand what people mean and not get caught up in symantecs etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted February 22, 2013 Administrator Share Posted February 22, 2013 Ya i think i understood what you meant and not about arguing about details like people do so much on the net ;)I hope it shows i TRY and understand what people mean and not get caught up in symantecs etcVery happy to hear that. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.