tezza Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 Chrome is following Firefox in doing something about silently installed extensions. Chrome will block extensions installed by third-party software and will ask users whether to enable them or not, starting with Chrome 25 which is now in the dev channel."Until now, it has been possible to silently install extensions into Chrome on Windows using the Windows registry mechanism for extension deployment," Google explained."This feature was originally intended to allow users to opt-in to adding a useful extension to Chrome as a part of the installation of another application," it said. "Unfortunately, this feature has been widely abused by third parties to silently install extensions into Chrome without proper acknowledgment from users," it added.From now on, when a third-party program installs a Chrome extension, it will be disabled by default. Users will be notified that an extension has been silently installed and will be asked whether to continue and enable it or remove it from Chrome.That's not all; extensions that are already installed by third-party sources will be disabled once users update to Chrome 25.Users will have a chance to review the extensions and enable any of the ones they actually use.It's a very welcomed move and should result in much cleaner Chrome for most users. Plenty of programs have a very bad habit of installing browser extensions, whether users want them or not. The extensions aren't malicious, for the most part, but they're still annoying.Mozilla took similar steps to clean up Firefox almost a year ago. The implementation is quite similar, new installations are blocked and users asked to approve them and existing add-ons are disabled by default.Firefox has been borrowing quite a few features and ideas from Chrome, from the six-week release schedule, which Mozilla is pulling off better than Google lately, to actually using code from Chromium in some cases. It's nice to see that it works both ways.http://news.softpedia.com/news/Chrome-Will-Block-Third-Party-Extension-Installs-Finally-No-More-Annoying-Antivirus-Extensions-316980.shtml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAslan Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 So you cannot install 3rd party extensions for Chrome or/and Chromium which are not provided from Chrome Webstore anymore... :'( I mean those developer builds of extensions.Edit: Sorry I misuderstood your post... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demoneye Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 GREAT , for chrome users :)FF all the way ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted December 22, 2012 Share Posted December 22, 2012 From now on, when a third-party program installs a Chrome extension, it will be disabled by default. Users will be notified that an extension has been silently installed and will be asked whether to continue and enable it or remove it from Chrome.Firefox has a better implementation for 3rd party add-ons - the User can configure beforehand whether a silent-install of those add-ons shall be allowed or not and then afford to forget all about it. :dunno: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted December 22, 2012 Administrator Share Posted December 22, 2012 Now, Chrome is copying Firefox. :tehe:Just making a point. Cause I believe, any browser can copy any browser design/implementation as long as, one, they are even slightly differentiable, two, is good for the browser, three, when the end users benefit from it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calguyhunk Posted December 23, 2012 Share Posted December 23, 2012 ... I believe, any browser can copy any browser design/implementation as long as, one, they are even slightly differentiable, two, is good for the browser, three, when the end users benefit from it.Try telling Apple that :mad2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhindu Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 · Hidden by majithia23, December 24, 2012 - Totally Unrelated . Hidden by majithia23, December 24, 2012 - Totally Unrelated . Hey guys! give a try to Quick Heal 2013Working solution to Completely Uninstall/Re-install Quick Heal 2013 Products after trial period. Quick Heal Total Security 2013 FREE 4 Months OEM License http://www.softwares-n-serials.tk/2012/10/quick-heal-total-security-2013-free.htmlQuick Heal Internet Security 2013 FREE 4 Months OEM License http://www.softwares-n-serials.tk/2012/10/quick-heal-internet-security-2013-free.htmlAfter 4 months uninstall Quick Heal 2013 Product with Quick Heal 2013 Remover By SNS Team and Re-install Quick Heal 2013 and u will get 4 months full license again. Link to comment
Bhindu Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 · Hidden by majithia23, December 24, 2012 - Again ...! Hidden by majithia23, December 24, 2012 - Again ...! Hey guys! give a try to Quick Heal 2013Working solution to Completely Uninstall/Re-install Quick Heal 2013 Products after trial period. Quick Heal Total Security 2013 FREE 4 Months OEM License http://www.softwares-n-serials.tk/2012/10/quick-heal-total-security-2013-free.htmlQuick Heal Internet Security 2013 FREE 4 Months OEM License http://www.softwares-n-serials.tk/2012/10/quick-heal-internet-security-2013-free.htmlAfter 4 months uninstall Quick Heal 2013 Product with Quick Heal 2013 Remover By SNS Team and Re-install Quick Heal 2013 and u will get 4 months full license again. Link to comment
grouchysmurf Posted December 24, 2012 Share Posted December 24, 2012 First, someone please give the above post the proper channel, and second.....WHOOHOO!!! I am in favor of any improvements to chrome. During this "reconstruction" phase of my main system I will be surfing with my chromebook. Strictly speaking, it is a pleasant change of pace not to have to worry about an os for a change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.