Jump to content

New York legislation would ban anonymous online speech


nsane.forums

Recommended Posts

nsane.forums

Sites would have to remove such comments unless posters agree to attach names.

Posted Image

Did you hear the one about New York state lawmakers who forgot about the First Amendment in the name of combating cyberbullying and “baseless political attacks?"

Proposed legislation in both chambers would require New York-based websites, such as blogs and newspapers, to “remove any comments posted on his or her website by an anonymous poster unless such anonymous poster agrees to attach his or her name to the post.”

No votes on the measures have been taken. But unless the First Amendment is repealed, they stand no chance of surviving any constitutional scrutiny even if they were approved.

Republican Assemblyman Jim Conte said the legislation would cut down on “mean-spirited and baseless political attacks” and “turns the spotlight on cyberbullies by forcing them to reveal their identity.”

Had the Internet been around in the late 1700s, perhaps the anonymously written Federalist Papers would have had to be taken down unless Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay revealed themselves.

“This statute would essentially destroy the ability to speak anonymously online on sites in New York,” said Kevin Bankston, a staff attorney with the Center for Democracy and Technology. He added that the legislation provides a “heckler’s veto to anybody who disagrees with or doesn’t like what an anonymous poster said.”

Sen. Thomas O’Mara, a Republican who is also sponsoring the measure, said it would “help lend some accountability to the Internet age.”

A cynic, however, might see an attempt by lawmakers to prop up Facebook’s falling stock price via an implicit endorsement of the Facebook model of identity on the Internet.

The Senate and Assembly measures, which are identical, cover messages on social networks, blogs, message boards, or “any other discussion site where people can hold conversations in the form of posted messages.”

The bills also demands those sites to have a contact number or e-mail address posted for “such removal requests, clearly visible in any sections where comments are posted.”

Oddly, the bill has no identification requirement for those who request the takedown of anonymous content.

Posted Image View: Original Article

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 3
  • Views 869
  • Created
  • Last Reply
AlienForce1

:protest: Stupids ... , maybe next the`ll make a law to know how many times we go to toilet :shit:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Bizarre™

Why would anyone who's looking for privacy ever state their name online? That's just retarded, in my opinion :bag:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


AlienForce1

Why would anyone who's looking for privacy ever state their name online? That's just retarded, in my opinion :bag:

And think that these guys should be the elite of the American politics ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...