rudrax Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 What is the difference between Adobe flash player and Adobe shockwave player? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technology Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 What is the difference between Adobe flash player and Adobe shockwave player? Good question..I think flash player gave flash and shockwave give away shock-waves..Soon Adobe will come up with hurricane or tornado player... :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anuraag Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 To view the videos you need Adobe Flash Player.Flash Player delivers fast loading front-end web applications, high-impact web site user interaction, interactive online advertising, and short to medium form animation.Adobe Shockwave Player displays content such as interactive games, simulations and user interfaces.Shockwave Player displays destination web content such as interactive multimedia product demos and training, e-merchandising applications, and rich-media multi-user games. Through Xtras, Shockwave Player is also extendable to playback custom-built applications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted May 17, 2012 Author Share Posted May 17, 2012 What is the difference between Adobe flash player and Adobe shockwave player? Good question..I think flash player gave flash and shockwave give away shock-waves..Soon Adobe will come up with hurricane or tornado player... :PAhh just crappy players..Is there only adobe left for playing flash contents on the web? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted May 17, 2012 Author Share Posted May 17, 2012 To view the videos you need Adobe Flash Player. Flash Player delivers fast loading front-end web applications, high-impact web site user interaction, interactive online advertising, and short to medium form animation. Adobe Shockwave Player displays content such as interactive games, simulations and user interfaces. Shockwave Player displays destination web content such as interactive multimedia product demos and training, e-merchandising applications, and rich-media multi-user games. Through Xtras, Shockwave Player is also extendable to playback custom-built applications.So shockwave player can't play .flv videos on the web at all? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technology Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 What is the difference between Adobe flash player and Adobe shockwave player? Good question..I think flash player gave flash and shockwave give away shock-waves..Soon Adobe will come up with hurricane or tornado player... :PAhh just crappy players..Is there only adobe left for playing flash contents on the web? How about silverlight by Microsoft..Though, I don't think silverlight player is default to play videos, silverlight only able to play video which is provided by Microsoft..I try to use HTML 3 as player, didn't do good job.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted May 17, 2012 Author Share Posted May 17, 2012 How about silverlight by Microsoft..Though, I don't think silverlight player is default to play videos, silverlight only able to play video which is provided by Microsoft..I try to use HTML 3 as player, didn't do good job..Every browser should have its own flash/media player engine optimized to low resources use Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technology Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 How about silverlight by Microsoft..Though, I don't think silverlight player is default to play videos, silverlight only able to play video which is provided by Microsoft..I try to use HTML 3 as player, didn't do good job..Every browser should have its own flash/media player engine optimized to low resources use I agree with you 100%, due to this I like Chrome, it already has build in Flash player unlike IE or Firefox..And, IE has build in HTML 3 to support flash video for some websites not all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted May 17, 2012 Author Share Posted May 17, 2012 But chrome uses a lot of CPU, says the link that I liked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted May 17, 2012 Administrator Share Posted May 17, 2012 Every browser should have its own flash/media player engine optimized to low resources use There is something like that, it's called html5. :P Seriously though. Chrome's build-in player in the end is the same thing just embedded. Having the third party thing already added by default doesn't make it part of the source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted May 17, 2012 Author Share Posted May 17, 2012 There is something like that, it's called html5. :P Seriously though.Not getting into action yet :angry: Well, will HTML5 be low on resources? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technology Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 There is something like that, it's called html5. :P Seriously though.Not getting into action yet :angry: Well, will HTML5 be low on resources? Very unlikely.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technology Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 But chrome uses a lot of CPU, says the link that I liked Indeed, Chrome uses alot of ram, if too many tabs are open and flash video are playing and in the same time user is also downloading file. These can have particular effect on Chrome ram usage.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted May 17, 2012 Author Share Posted May 17, 2012 But chrome uses a lot of CPU, says the link that I liked Indeed, Chrome uses alot of ram, if too many tabs are open and flash video are playing and in the same time user is also downloading file. These can have particular effect on Chrome ram usage..Ahh, I don't have any issue with RAM uses..just the damn thing heats up my CPU..it should use the GPU rather.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted May 17, 2012 Author Share Posted May 17, 2012 i got a 4 gig pull from chromium 20 1 time :troll: :rofl:What the F!..nahh, you lie :duh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technology Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 i got a 4 gig pull from chromium 20 1 time :troll: :rofl: Do explain.. :) Bit confused! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted May 17, 2012 Author Share Posted May 17, 2012 <p><br /> <br /> i got a 4 gig pull from chromium 20 1 time <img alt=" :troll:" class="bbc_emoticon" src="http://www.nsaneforums.com/public/style_emoticons/default/Trollface.png" /> <img alt=" :rofl:" class="bbc_emoticon" src="http://www.nsaneforums.com/public/style_emoticons/default/rofl.gif" /><br /><br /> What the F!..nahh, you lie <img alt=" :duh:" class="bbc_emoticon" src="http://www.nsaneforums.com/public/style_emoticons/default/Klopf.gif" /><br /></p> <a href='http://www.layoutsparks.com/1/110874/hand-rainbow-rotating-animated.html'><img src='http://images2.layoutsparks.com/1/110874/hand-rainbow-rotating-animated.gif' alt='hand rainbow rotating animated pictures, backgrounds and images' title='hand rainbow rotating animated pictures, backgrounds and images'></a> on an 8 gig environmental :troll: :rofl:With your theory, it would use 8 gig on a 16 gig environment..u dumb butt boY :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technology Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Chromium 20! used 4GB of memory :lol: on my GOD DAMN KILLER RIG Dammm. So, what are requirement for Chromium. Min 60GB of hard drive and 4GB of Ram and have high resolution Graphic card... :huh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.