Jump to content

AV-Comparatives "Real World" Protection Test 14th April 2012


anuraag

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 8
  • Views 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

@Ehsan

Yeah kasper is rock but a rock made ​​of cotton :P ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Real world test without Norton does not mean. :)

norton dont need a test!! but the test needed norton :lol:

Symantec didn't wanted to take part in On Demand Detection test. Its so important in evaluating an antivirus suite. Thats why av-comparative decided not to test norton.

Read the servey'2012 pdf. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Kaspersky is killing all the tests this year AV-C, AV-Test etc. even in all the amateur youtube tests. To bad there isnt an unlimited Kaspersky trial reset lol. Top end Russian programming. Soviet programmers FTW! Surprised to see Avast do well, usually its below ESET or hovering around there somewhere.

Symantec likes to pick and choose which tests to participate in, basically weighting their statistics and marketing. AV-C requires vendors to perform in ALL tests, not cherry pick. Too bad for poor Symantec.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Surprised to see Webroot perform so bad. O.o

The cloud should have given it an extra edge. O.o

Still, 90% is still a good result (I find the 248 false positives in other av-comp. tests far more alarming.).

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...