maia Posted January 19, 2012 Share Posted January 19, 2012 Hello! :)This is a summary of all the anti-virus tests of 2011.Thanks to SM UnlimitedAV-Comparatives:http://www.av-comparatives.org/AV-Test: http://www.av-test.o...s/test-reports/VBulletin (VB100): http://www.virusbtn.com/indexMalware Research group: http://malwareresear.../malware-tests/Antimalware.ru: http://translate.goo...n_test_x64_2011Dennis Labs: http://www.dennistec...TP2011_SYMC.pdfPassmark: http://www.passmark....%22antivirus%22Results they are grouped in: On Demand, Retrospective, Dynamic Real World, Removal, Performance,False positives and the King of Tests.On Demand: Raw detection capabilities of signatures when fully updated with latest definitions.Retrospective: Capabilities of heuristics and generic signatures against new unknown malware.Dynamic: Real world protection capabilities using all components of the security software to demonstrate effectiveness in the real world (0 day, cloud, behaviour blocking, self defence, web blocking, etc)Removal: Effectiveness at cleaning a system from malware, the higher the score the better the product is at disinfection and removal of malware trace elements without damaging the system in the process.Performance score (higher is better) :How fast and responsive products perform. The higher the result the less of an impact on your system.only helps to provide comparison of performance between products.False Positives: Total false positives across all tests with such information available. The results help to show which products are more prone to false positives.King of Tests: Personalised scoring system in an attempt to determine which antivirus solutions did the best across all the categories equally (This year is also weighted on uncertainty). Products with >50% mean uncertainty are not included. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwop Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 What a bunch of bullshit.It's almost a certainty that those numbers are fabricated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zap316 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 What a bunch of bullshit.It's almost a certainty that those numbers are fabricated.I totally agree with you these numbers are garbage no need for language! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darko999 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Yeah these numbers sometimes are a big fail, the only thing I can agree by myself "Testing by myself" is that Kaspersky has an awesome repair scope, but seriously, Gdata top retrospective detection? I tested it like 1 month ago with zero day malware and its behavior shield didn't detect anything... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweety.Abd Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 What a bunch of bullshit.It's almost a certainty that those numbers are fabricated.I completely agree with you. +1 and I liked how you put it ;) But nevertheless, thanks for sharing it with us. Even though I don't usually believe such reports, I like to read them. Thanks for the share :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmr1684 Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 ok i personally using comodo and i seen daily how it's work so i know it removing capacity. the point is literally pathetic. thats it bye bye bye :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neevarp Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 Thanks for the effort. Saw the post over at wilders too. Keep up the good work. :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knightmare Posted January 20, 2012 Share Posted January 20, 2012 I feel like ESET is way too low on each list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.