Jump to content

Sen. Franken demands answers from Carrier IQ, suggests phone snooping violates federal law


beer

Recommended Posts

presskit_official_color_hr-4ed7d05-intro-thumb-640xauto-28148.jpg

US Sen. Al Franken today demanded answers from Carrier IQ about what kind of data its software for smartphones collects and how it is used and stored. Noting that Carrier IQ has been "accused of secretly logging location and private information of millions of smartphone users," Franken forwarded the company 11 questions, many of them with multiple parts, and asked for answers by Dec. 14.

Franken started out by asking for specifics on what types of information Carrier IQ collects, specifically whether it includes location, numbers dialed, the contents of text messages and e-mails, URLs of websites visited, search query histories, contact information from address books, and keystroke data. "What if any of this data is transmitted off of a users’ phone? When? In what form?" Franken asks. "Is that data transmitted to Carrier IQ? Is it transmitted to smartphone manufacturers, operating system providers, or carriers? Is it transmitted to any other third parties?"

Franken further wants to know if Carrier IQ has disclosed user data to federal or state law enforcement, whether Carrier IQ lets users opt out of logging and transmission of data, and what steps the company takes to protect this data against security threats. The senator strongly hints that he believes Carrier IQ has violated various federal laws.

"Does Carrier IQ believe that its actions comply with the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, including the federal wiretap statute (18 U.S.C. § 2511 et seq.), the pen register statute (18 USC § 3121 et seq.), and the Stored Communications Act (18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq.)?" Franken's letter asks. "Does Carrier IQ believe that its actions comply with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030)? Why?"

Addressed to Carrier IQ CEO Larry Lenhart, Franken's letter also says "It appears that this software runs automatically every time you turn your phone on. It also appears that an average user would have no way to know that this software is running—and that when that user finds out, he or she will have no reasonable means to remove or stop it." Yesterday, Forbes reported that former Justice Department lawyer Paul Ohm believes Carrier IQ's actions are grounds for a class action lawsuit based on a federal wiretapping law.

Controversy over Carrier IQ began in the past few weeks when researcher Trevor Eckhart published analysis of the company's software, saying it secretly chronicles a user’s phone experience, including use of apps, battery life, and texts. Carrier IQ initially sent Eckhart a cease-and-desist notice, but ultimately withdrew the notice and apologized to Eckhart. However, the company said its software does not record keystrokes, inspect or report on the content of e-mails and text messages, and it does not sell data to third parties. "Our software is designed to help mobile network providers diagnose critical issues that lead to problems such as dropped calls and battery drain," the company said.

The full spread of Carrier IQ software is unknown, although it's been claimed that it is installed on millions of Android, BlackBerry, and Nokia phones. Samsung told Ars in a statement that "Carrier IQ is a service requested by the carriers for Samsung to integrate into products. Samsung does not receive the consumer information generated by Carrier IQ."

AT&T has reportedly confirmed using Carrier IQ "to improve wireless network and service performance," while Verizon Wireless has denied doing so. Research In Motion has said it does not preinstall Carrier IQ on BlackBerry phones and does not authorize carriers to add the software later.

As for the iPhone, Carrier IQ references have been found in Apple's iOS, although the Unofficial Apple Weblog reports that it found no references to key logging and that Carrier IQ may not be enabled.

cease-and-desist backfire :think:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 1
  • Views 871
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Apple: We Don’t Use Carrier IQ… In Most Of Our Products… Anymore.

The tech world is up in arms this week about Carrier IQ, the mobile data logging software that comes pre-installed (and rather well hidden) on an increasingly huge number of handsets. It’s still entirely unclear as to what’s being logged and, more importantly, what (if anything) is being sent off the handset — but one thing’s for sure: people don’t like it.

As the controversy swells, companies are rushing to distance themselves from the matter. The latest ones looking to get on the right side of the air gap? Apple.

Apple’s Statement:

We stopped supporting CarrierIQ with iOS 5 in most of our products and will remove it completely in a future software update. With any diagnostic data sent to Apple, customers must actively opt-in to share this information, and if they do, the data is sent in an anonymous and encrypted form and does not include any personal information. We never recorded keystrokes, messages or any other personal information for diagnostic data and have no plans to ever do so.

So yes, Apple supported Carrier IQ at some point. But not anymore, as of iOS 5. At least, not with most of their products. Like the rest of the lot, however, they’re assuring everyone that no keystrokes, messages, or identifiable bits were transmitted. From what researchers have found so far (and from what Apple claims above), Carrier IQ was only called in to play on iOS devices if you manually turned on the diagnostics option (which, prior to iOS 5, was buried pretty deep in the settings. Beginning with iOS 5, it’s offered up during the initial device setup.)

Which ones do still support it, even with iOS 5? Your guess is as good as ours — at least, until the security researchers swarming around this topic finish tearing apart every packet they can wrap their hands around.

You can pore over our full coverage of Carrier IQ here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...