Jump to content
Login new information ×
Login new information
Donations campaign phase one 2024
  • Technology News

    Intel 16C/24T i7-13700K Raptor Lake bests AMD's 16C/32T Ryzen 5950X in leaked Geekbench

    Karlston

    By Karlston,
    Published Date:

    • 3 comments
    • 436 views
    • 2 minutes
     Share
    • 3 comments
    • 436 views
    • 2 minutes

    As we move into the end of July, two mega desktop CPU launches await us in the form of AMD's Ryzen 7000 (Zen 4) plus Socket AM5 platform, and Intel's 13th Gen Raptor Lake-S. As such, over the last couple of weeks or so, benchmark leaks and early reviews have become frequent occurrences.

     

    Recently an early review of a purported Core i9-13900K was posted and the CPU, although very powerful, is seen consuming quite a lot of power when pushed. With that, the chip was also reaching 100°C even with a 360 AIO cooler.

     

    However, as said above, Raptor Lake also has genuine performance to show for all that power draw. The latest leak comes in the form of a Geekbench 5 benchmark of the Core i7-13700K, which will be one performance tier below the 24 core 32 thread (24C/32T) Core i9-13900K.

     

    The CPU tested here has put up 2,090 points in the single-core test and 16,542 points in the multi-core benchmark.

     

    1658500404_13700k_geekbench_(via_benchle

     

    The score, especially the single-threaded one, is very impressive compared to AMD's Ryzen 5000 series CPUs and even the upcoming Ryzen 7000 Zen 4 parts could have a hard time keeping up. On the multi-threaded side though, it is a close call, though the numbers are still impressive nonetheless as the 13700K only features half the number big cores (P-cores) compared to a 16 core 5950X.

     

    Here is how the Core i7-13700K Geekbench 5 score compares with 13900K and 13600K, as well as Ryzen 5000 parts. The percentage differences have been given taking the 8C/16T Ryzen 7 5800X as base:

     

    CPU Cores/Threads GB 5 Single % diff GB 5 Multi % diff
    Core i9-13900K 8P+16e / 32T 2133 +27.7% 23701 +129.5%
    Core i7-13700K 8P+8e/ 24T 2090 +25.15% 16542 +60.17%
    Core i5-13600K 6P+8e/ 20T 1980 +18.56% 14425 +39.67%
    Ryzen 9 5950X 16C / 32T 1685 +9.0% 16506 +60.00%
    Ryzen 9 5900X 12C / 24T 1669 -1.0% 13954 +35.00%
    Ryzen 9 5800X 8C / 16T 1670 - 10328 -

     

    The leaked benchmark also shows the i7-13700K running on an ASRock Z690 motherboard which recently received firmware support for the upcoming Raptor Lake-S family alongside Asus and MSI. Another noteworthy thing is the supposed use of DDR4 memory which is in line with a recent leak that suggested DDR4 DRAM support on Raptor Lake-S.

     

    Source and image: Geekbench via Benchleaks (Twitter)

     

     

    Intel 16C/24T i7-13700K Raptor Lake bests AMD's 16C/32T Ryzen 5950X in leaked Geekbench

    • tommiy, xkryptonx and DKT27
    • Like 2
    • Haha 1
     Share
    Go to news

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    xkryptonx

    And AMD 7000 comes with DDR5 and RDNA-3, and it beats dedicated GPUs like Iris Xe, and Nvidia MX4xx. I would rather go again for AMD and get a laptop with  Ryzen APU. On the top of that Ryzen is energy friendly. Intel still lags behind in many departments such DDR5 based iGPU, and power consumption. I was Intel devoutee but Ryzen 5000 changed the whole game for me. Lets see how 7000 parry with RaptorLake once it is officially made available, In term of low power consumption, stellar battery life, and DDR5 based iGPU, i put my on money on AMD. My device never go above 65  C even when the temp here is 40+.

    • Karlston and DKT27
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Karlston
    36 minutes ago, xkryptonx said:

    I was Intel devoutee but Ryzen 5000 changed the whole game for me.

     

    Same here. Happy with the 5900X desktop I built a little over a year ago.

     

    With DDR5 it was a gamble by AMD that consumers would choose DDR5 because it was faster than DDR4, not avoid it because it was more expensive than DDR4. IIRC, Intel will support both, not sure if they can do that on the same motherboard though.

    • DKT27 and xkryptonx
    • Like 2
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    xkryptonx
    12 hours ago, Karlston said:

     

    Same here. Happy with the 5900X desktop I built a little over a year ago.

     

    With DDR5 it was a gamble by AMD that consumers would choose DDR5 because it was faster than DDR4, not avoid it because it was more expensive than DDR4. IIRC, Intel will support both, not sure if they can do that on the same motherboard though.

    That is correct. AMD shifted to AM5 socket + DDR5 only to support RDNA2 and RDNA3. While intel, as of now, backward compatible with DDR4. Given high price and stock, Many people opt for DDR4.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    ×

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...