Jump to content
  • Apple barred from Google antitrust trial, putting $20 billion search deal on the line


    Karlston

    • 50 views
    • 4 minutes
     Share


    • 50 views
    • 4 minutes

    Google's sizeable payments for Safari defaults could be ending.

    Apple has suffered a blow in its efforts to salvage its lucrative search placement deal with Google. A new ruling from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals affirms that Apple cannot participate in Google's upcoming antitrust hearing, which could leave a multibillion-dollar hole in Apple's balance sheet. The judges in the case say Apple simply waited too long to get involved.

     

    Just a few years ago, a high-stakes court case involving Apple and Google would have found the companies on opposing sides, but not today. Apple's and Google's interests are strongly aligned here, to the tune of $20 billion. Google forks over that cash every year, and it's happy to do so to secure placement as the default search provider in the Safari desktop and mobile browser.

     

    The antitrust penalties pending against Google would make that deal impermissible. Throughout the case, the government made the value of defaults clear—most people never change them. That effectively delivers Google a captive audience on Apple devices.

     

    Google's ongoing legal battle with the DOJ's antitrust division is shaping up to be the most significant action the government has taken against a tech company since Microsoft in the late '90s. Perhaps this period of stability tricked Google's partners into thinking nothing would change, but the seriousness of the government's proposed remedies seems to have convinced them otherwise.

     

    Google lost the case in August 2024, and the government proposed remedies in October. According to MediaPost, the appeals court took issue with Apple's sluggishness in choosing sides. It didn't even make its filing to participate in the remedy phase until November, some 33 days after the initial proposal. The judges ruled this delay "seems difficult to justify."

     

    When Google returns to court in the coming weeks, the company's attorneys will not be flanked by Apple's legal team. While Apple will be allowed to submit written testimony and file friend-of-the-court briefs, it will not be able to present evidence to the court or cross-examine witnesses, as it sought. Apple argued that it was entitled to do so because it had a direct stake in the outcome.

    Apple seeks search partner, must have $20 billion

    If this penalty sticks, Apple could be looking for a new suitor. Something has to be the default search provider in Safari and other Apple products. It could continue using Google without getting paid, but the company will surely look to recoup some of that lost Google money. Regardless, there aren't many options.

     

    Google is in this situation specifically because it has a monopoly in search; whether or not it abuses that monopoly is a question for the courts (but it's not looking good). However, that doesn't change the fact that, as a monopoly, Google has almost no competition. Microsoft has tried for years to make Bing competitive, and Microsoft is no lightweight on the Internet. Yet Google Search continues to own 90 percent of the market.

     

    Aside from regional options like Yandex in Russia and Baidu in China, it's slim pickings out there. Bing is really the only major alternative to Google, but would Microsoft pay for Safari placement? It's unlikely that any smaller boutique search provider like Kagi DuckDuckGo could fulfill the needs of Apple, but it would be interesting to see a smaller player get a boost on Apple's platform. Having a viable competitor—whoever it may be—on Apple devices could start changing the balance of power in search.

     

    Last year, Anthropic also attempted to be heard in the case after the government proposed forcing Google to sell off its AI investments—like the multibillion-dollar stake it owns in Anthropic. Anthropic wanted to provide witness statements to the court, but the government's reversal on AI funding made this a moot point. That may help Google's AI search efforts down the road, but it would require AI search to be something people want to use—the jury is out on that.

     

    Source


    Hope you enjoyed this news post.

    Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every day for many years.

    News posts... 2023: 5,800+ | 2024: 5,700+ | 2025 (till end of February): 874

    RIP Matrix | Farewell my friend  :sadbye:


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...