oZ. Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 http://nsanedown.com/?request=12565674vshttp://nsanedown.com/?request=32927796can anyone tell me which one is better? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HX1 Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 I honestly feel O&O Cache Pro would be a good choice, if its available.. or Cacheman.. Process Lasso, I am not too sure about but I have used the O&O Program with good results in the past.. yet with Windows 7 your results are not going to really get a lot better.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oZ. Posted March 8, 2011 Author Share Posted March 8, 2011 I honestly feel O&O Cache Pro would be a good choice, if its available.. or Cacheman.. Process Lasso, I am not too sure about but I have used the O&O Program with good results in the past.. yet with Windows 7 your results are not going to really get a lot better..so you are saying Cachman or process lasso or even your O&O cache pro wouldn't do much? but for process lasso it does speed thing up to the point where i notice it. as for cacheman i just started using and doesn't seem much difference. maybe im used to process lasso's improved performance yet cacheman aren't doing any better than PLasso. imobut i still need someone's comment on which is betterthanks for reply Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warrior Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Yeah I agreed with heath. In win7 it really doesn't show any gr8 improvements.As far process lasso is concerned, I found it useless after I started using Process Hacker. Though they are different type of apps but once familiar with process hacker you really wont need any memory management tools.Also perfectdisk's smartplacement seemed to improve slighthly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 @oZ.:Cacheman is for memory (RAM). Process Lasso is for processes (CPU). It's difficult to compare two programs with different functions ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lazzser Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 http://nsanedown.com/?request=12565674vshttp://nsanedown.com/?request=32927796can anyone tell me which one is better?It sounds to me like "Nikon vs Volkswagen"... :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oZ. Posted March 8, 2011 Author Share Posted March 8, 2011 @oZ.:Cacheman is for memory (RAM). Process Lasso is for processes (CPU). It's difficult to compare two programs with different functions ^_^cacheman also deals with processes =\ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Process Lasso is about CPU.Cacheman is about RAM.The only (small) overlap lies in Cacheman's functionality which allows you to set 'permanent' process priorities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudulz Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 try this :) SuperCacheSuperVolumeRamDiskhttp://www.superspeed.com/sorry out of topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 cacheman also deals with processes =\True, but Cacheman doesn't deal with processes heavily like Process Lasso. The same can be said with Process Lasso, which doesn't deal with memory heavily like Cacheman ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HX1 Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 SuperCache and SuperVolume .. and in a way RAM Disk.. all three are about HD Performance... and SuperVolume requires its own separate Partition.. SuperCache targets the way files are cached on the HD for local drives and installs.. If you have the RAM .. RAM Disk can improve performance but only if you actually have enough RAM to sacrifice and basically choose to use this RAM instead of the HD.. in this process you have only a performance improvement doing certain operations.. so basically changes the operational structure or configuration of the system itself to have much higher quicker response performance.. Like running a Website and using RAM Disk to host the files or other data. or using it as a scratch disk for PS CS5.. There are a wide range of uses.. and it depends on your hardware.. but loading them up on a regular system .. it will not necessarily work as intended to accomplish the goal as set forth in the above posts... You may also have slower boot times if you choose to put your PageFile on RAM Disk as well.. but work out the system lag.. on some boxes this way.. with enough 'juice' on a box.. you can really speed things up to exceed the 'flaws' as it were of older OSes especially or extended circumstances like I mentioned....SuperSpeed Products are excellent disk cache utilities.... but for the simplistic use of improving the system cache and hardware utilization... for everyday use.. I am still stying with my above comment..The last thing I want to state here .. is that either, and/or any of these products will only make a different n the areas in which you have bottlenecks in your system.. and it will take some analyzing and thinking to make a decision which better suits your needs and there may not be an all encompassing one at that.. You may have to use different tools depending on the configuration and system/programmatic requirements of what your doing at the time... Lastly.. if these programs and procedures have not been optimized and written for optimal performance and standards compliance they still may not improve.. no matter how big the processor.. or the RAM... or any other area.. If you do not maintain your computer the way it should be... you are also looking at problematic performance.. Even Video Cards can slow a fast system down.. one that is perfectly maintained... Posting other system specifications would greatly improve the ability for people to really target any area... Your system itself may not be up to the task.. The program your trying to improve may not be as well.. and it could be other areas.. bottom line.. and simply put... It takes more work.. ( as you know ) :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nima Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 You may use both of them, Cacheman for RAM and ProcessLasso for CPU, but for CPU and process optimization, I strongly suggest ProcessLasso; disable all CPU optimization in Cacheman and use both of them.Both of them are active in background, so you will not confused too much with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oZ. Posted March 8, 2011 Author Share Posted March 8, 2011 You may use both of them, Cacheman for RAM and ProcessLasso for CPU, but for CPU and process optimization, I strongly suggest ProcessLasso; disable all CPU optimization in Cacheman and use both of them.Both of them are active in background, so you will not confused too much with them.Umm okie =) i shall do that abd hope process lasso 4.1 will be out soonYou may use both of them, Cacheman for RAM and ProcessLasso for CPU, but for CPU and process optimization, I strongly suggest ProcessLasso; disable all CPU optimization in Cacheman and use both of them.Both of them are active in background, so you will not confused too much with them.i can't seem to find any way to disable all CPU & process optimization for Cacheman v7 :frusty: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nima Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 You may use both of them, Cacheman for RAM and ProcessLasso for CPU, but for CPU and process optimization, I strongly suggest ProcessLasso; disable all CPU optimization in Cacheman and use both of them.Both of them are active in background, so you will not confused too much with them.Umm okie =) i shall do that abd hope process lasso 4.1 will be out soonYou may use both of them, Cacheman for RAM and ProcessLasso for CPU, but for CPU and process optimization, I strongly suggest ProcessLasso; disable all CPU optimization in Cacheman and use both of them.Both of them are active in background, so you will not confused too much with them.i can't seem to find any way to disable all CPU & process optimization for Cacheman v7 :frusty:Why? just don't set any permanent priorities, and don't do anything related to processes with Cacheman (use ProcessLasso instead); like Kill, Terminate, Suspend, ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oZ. Posted March 10, 2011 Author Share Posted March 10, 2011 You may use both of them, Cacheman for RAM and ProcessLasso for CPU, but for CPU and process optimization, I strongly suggest ProcessLasso; disable all CPU optimization in Cacheman and use both of them.Both of them are active in background, so you will not confused too much with them.Umm okie =) i shall do that abd hope process lasso 4.1 will be out soonYou may use both of them, Cacheman for RAM and ProcessLasso for CPU, but for CPU and process optimization, I strongly suggest ProcessLasso; disable all CPU optimization in Cacheman and use both of them.Both of them are active in background, so you will not confused too much with them.i can't seem to find any way to disable all CPU & process optimization for Cacheman v7 :frusty:Why? just don't set any permanent priorities, and don't do anything related to processes with Cacheman (use ProcessLasso instead); like Kill, Terminate, Suspend, ...you mean just leave cacheman the way it is and use proceslasso ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nima Posted March 11, 2011 Share Posted March 11, 2011 You may use both of them, Cacheman for RAM and ProcessLasso for CPU, but for CPU and process optimization, I strongly suggest ProcessLasso; disable all CPU optimization in Cacheman and use both of them.Both of them are active in background, so you will not confused too much with them.Umm okie =) i shall do that abd hope process lasso 4.1 will be out soonYou may use both of them, Cacheman for RAM and ProcessLasso for CPU, but for CPU and process optimization, I strongly suggest ProcessLasso; disable all CPU optimization in Cacheman and use both of them.Both of them are active in background, so you will not confused too much with them.i can't seem to find any way to disable all CPU & process optimization for Cacheman v7 :frusty:Why? just don't set any permanent priorities, and don't do anything related to processes with Cacheman (use ProcessLasso instead); like Kill, Terminate, Suspend, ...you mean just leave cacheman the way it is and use proceslasso ?Yeah, why not? as I said before, don't do anything related to CPU with Cacheman; if you don't like this, you can install SuperCache, it works on RAM only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.