Wikileaks: A Big Dangerous US Government Con Job

[toyo]

Author: F. William Engdahl

VoltaireNet.org

December 21, 2010

The story on the surface makes for a script for a new Oliver Stone Hollywood thriller. A 39-year old Australian hacker holds the President of the United States and his State Department hostage to a gigantic cyber “leak,” unless the President leaves Julian Assange and his Wikileaks free to release hundreds of thousands of pages of sensitive US Government memos. A closer look at the details, so far carefully leaked by the most ultra-establishment of international media such as the New York Times, reveals a clear agenda. That agenda coincidentally serves to buttress the agenda of US geopolitics around the world from Iran to Russia to North Korea. The Wikileaks is a big and dangerous US intelligence Con Job which will likely be used to police the Internet.

Assange says he believes the US Government version of 9/11 and calls the Bilderberg Group a normal meeting of people.

It is almost too perfectly-scripted to be true. A discontented 22-year old US Army soldier on duty in Baghdad, Bradley Manning, a low-grade US Army intelligence analyst, described as a loner, a gay in the military, a disgruntled “computer geek,” sifts through classified information at Forward Operating Base Hammer. He decides to secretly download US State Department email communications from the entire world over a period of eight months for hours a day, onto his blank CDs while pretending to be listening to Lady Gaga. In addition to diplomatic cables, Manning is believed to have provided WikiLeaks with helicopter gun camera video of an errant US attack in Baghdad on unarmed journalists, and with war logs from Iraq and Afghanistan.

Manning then is supposed to have tracked down a notorious former US computer hacker to get his 250,000 pages of classified US State Department cables out in the Internet for the whole world to see. He allegedly told the US hacker that the documents he had contained “incredible, awful things that belonged in the public domain and not on some server stored in a dark room in Washington, DC.” The hacker turned him in to US authorities so the story goes. Manning is now incommunicado since months in US military confinement so we cannot ask him, conveniently. The Pentagon routinely hires the best hackers to design their security systems.

Then the plot thickens. The 250,000 pages end up at the desk of Julian Assange, the 39-year-old Australian founder of a supposedly anti-establishment website with the cute name Wikileaks. Assange decides to selectively choose several of the world’s most ultra-establishment news media to exclusively handle the leaking job for him as he seems to be on the run from Interpol, not for leaking classified information, but for allegedly having consensual sex with two Swedish women who later decided it was rape.

He selects as exclusive newspapers to decide what is to be leaked the New York Times which did such service in promoting faked propaganda against Saddam that led to the Iraqi war, the London Guardian and Der Spiegel. Assange claims he had no time to sift through so many pages so handed them to the trusted editors of the establishment media for them to decide what should be released. Very “anti-establishment” that. The New York Times even assigned one of its top people, David E. Sanger, to control the release of the Wikileaks material. Sanger is no establishment outsider. He sits as a member of the elite Council on Foreign Relations as well as the Aspen Institute Strategy Group together with the likes of Condi Rice, former Defense Secretary William Perry, former CIA head John Deutch, former State Department Deputy Secretary and now World Bank head Robert Zoellick among others.

Indeed a strange choice of media for a person who claims to be anti-establishment. But then Assange also says he believes the US Government version of 9/11 and calls the Bilderberg Group a normal meeting of people, a very establishment view.

Not so secret cables…

The latest sensational Wikileaks documents allegedly from the US State Department embassies around the world to Washington are definitely not as Hillary Clinton claimed “an attack on America’s foreign policy interests that have endangered innocent people.” And they do not amount to what the Italian foreign minister, called the “September 11 of world diplomacy.” The British government calls them a threat to national security and an aide to Canada’s Prime Minister calls on the CIA to assassinate Assange, as does kooky would-be US Presidential hopeful Sarah Palin.

Most important, the 250,000 cables are not “top secret” as we might have thought. Between two and three million US Government employees are cleared to see this level of “secret” document,[1] and some 500,000 people around the world have access to the Secret Internet Protocol Network (SIPRnet) where the cables were stored. Siprnet is not recommended for distribution of top-secret information. Only 6% or 15,000 pages of the documents have been classified as even secret, a level below top-secret. Another 40% were the lowest level, “confidential”, while the rest were unclassified. In brief, it was not all that secret.[2]

Most of the revelations so far have been unspectacular. In Germany the revelations led to the removal of a prominent young FDP politician close to Guido Westerwelle who apparently liked to talk too much to his counterpart at the US Embassy. The revelations about Russian politics, that a US Embassy official refers to Putin and Medvedev as “Batman and Robin,” tells more about the cultural level of current US State Department personnel than it does about internal Russian politics.

But for anyone who has studied the craft of intelligence and of disinformation, a clear pattern emerges in the Wikileaks drama. The focus is put on select US geopolitical targets, appearing as Hillary Clinton put it “to justify US sanctions against Iran.” They claim North Korea with China’s granting of free passage to Korean ships despite US State Department pleas, send dangerous missiles to Iran. Saudi Arabia’s ailing King Abdullah reportedly called Iran’s President a Hitler.

Excuse to police the Internet?

What is emerging from all the sound and Wikileaks fury in Washington is that the entire scandal is serving to advance a long-standing Obama and Bush agenda of policing the until-now free Internet. Already the US Government has shut the Wikileaks server in the United States though no identifiable US law has been broken.

The process of policing the Web was well underway before the current leaks scandal. In 2009 Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller and Republican Olympia Snowe introduced the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 (S.773). It would give the President unlimited power to disconnect private-sector computers from the internet. The bill “would allow the president to ‘declare a cyber-security emergency’ relating to ‘non-governmental’ computer networks and do what’s necessary to respond to the threat.” We can expect that now this controversial piece of legislation will get top priority when a new Republican House and the Senate convene in January.

The US Department of Homeland Security, an agency created in the political hysteria following 9/11 2001 that has been compared to the Gestapo, has already begun policing the Internet. They are quietly seizing and shutting down internet websites (web domains) without due process or a proper trial. DHS simply seizes web domains that it wants to and posts an ominous “Department of Justice” logo on the web site. See an example at http://torrent-finder.com. Over 75 websites were seized and shut in a recent week. Right now, their focus is websites that they claim “violate copyrights,” yet the torrent-finder.com website that was seized by DHS contained no copyrighted content whatsoever. It was merely a search engine website that linked to destinations where people could access copyrighted content. Step by careful step freedom of speech can be taken away. Then what?

Original story (Infowars)

[Nemesis]

it seems to me that this is right up there with the shooting of John F. Kennedy, 9-11 and Area 5-1 for conspiracy stuff... no one knows the real truth.Read This

[toyo]

And probably it will get even more complicated as times goes by and events develop. Occam's razor is just a philosophical concept. There are others who just think otherwise and dedicated their lives to prove they're right. Not one philosophy school can prove it is completely right. It's just our perpetual fight to explain the world around us somehow.

So maybe Occam would tell us that the simplest way is that Manning betrayed USA and then Assange wikileaked the info, good or not. Thinking that CIA is involved (or anyone else) involves another factor and makes the equation more complicated.

But it's just wrong trying to simplify every unknown fact. While there are some cases where indeed Occam's razor can be correctly applied, many others are just the opposite.

It's getting really boring living in this sea of obscured knowledge all around us, but you cannot really ever touch it...

[shajt]

Just another CIA / 'Black' project , like those you mentioned above.

Except , this one is ongoing, it's in alpha , maybe beta stage right now.

JFK and 9/11 are obvious black ops, classics.

Area51 (IMO) has nothing to do with aliens and UFOs , but it's convenient for them to spread rumors that it has.

They protect that base heavily because it's a HUGE cocaine storage.

[bwop]

It has seemed entirely obvious for a long time now that WL is a false front.

What exactly has WL 'leaked' that was so damning that would warrant the attention it's receiving??

My guess is that one goal of having WL do all of this 'damage' would be to 'prove' that the Internet needs to be under tighter control.

[shought]

What exactly has WL 'leaked' that was so damning that would warrant the attention it's receiving??

http://www.thebaron.info/namirnooreldeenandsaeedchmagh.html

-----

Don't get me wrong, I too believe that the US government is genius and invented some kind of master plan to brainwash everyone, I mean, they're politicians, democratically (well, some doubt that, but let's say so for the sake of argument) chosen, so they must be geniuses, right? (Sarcasm intended.)

Guys, politicians are just

not

that

smart!

;)

[jalaffa]

The latest leaks have not contained much juice. That is ok.

[toyo]

That video will haunt me for a looong time. The sons o' bitches think they are in Modern Warfare. Wild Wild East FTW.

"Lemme shoot, lemme shoot!"

"Oh, it went through the windshield! Daddy gonna give you big boys a nice, creamy icecream when you get back to base"

"Wow, there are SO many bodies here. I think they just drove over the poor guys liver" *Happy evil laughters*

and the best one: "NICE!"