jalaffa Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 <img src="http://nsanedown.com/images/logos/foobar.png" class="logo" alt="Foobar2000" title="Foobar2000" />Foobar2000 is an advanced audio player for the Windows platform. Some of the basic features include Replay Gain support, a low-memory footprint, and native support for several popular audio formats. Features include open-component architecture, allowing third-party developers to extend functionality of the player; built-in support for WAV, AIFF, VOC, AU, SND, Ogg Vorbis, MPC, MP2, MP3, MPEG-4 AAC, FLAC, OggFLAC, Monkey's Audio, WavPack, Speex, CDDA, TFMX, and SPC; support through third-party plug-ins; extraction on-the-fly from RAR; 7-Zip and ZIP archives; full Unicode support on Windows NT; efficient handling of large playlists; a highly customizable playlist display; and customizable keyboard shortcuts.<a href="http://www.nsanedown.com/?request=4299075" target="_blank">Download</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Siddharta Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Since you have been posting this software, I once decided to try it. I say I still prefer Aimp, and I would glady see it been frontpaged instead.And mind you, do not let anyone misunderstand me (as in some other occasion), it is a sincere and respectful opinion!!! :D I would use foobar or Aimp mainly in netbooks 'cause they don't seem to consume many resources. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dotnetnightmare Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 I agree. AIMP has by far better sound quality with 32bit sound processing. I have tried endlessly to produce similar quality in foobar and failed. I really wanted foobar to work for me as it launches faster than aimp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.