Macrium Reflect X - 10 Reasons - Why its New Licensing (Subscription Payment) is diabolical.

[Priyanka Chopra]

The shift towards "subscription payment" services, particularly in software like Macrium Reflect X, raises several critical concerns that warrant public attention. Here are some compelling reasons to advocate against this model:

 

1. Financial Slavery and Consumer Lock-In
 
Subscription services lead to significantly higher costs in the long run compared to one-time purchase. Consumers may find themselves paying much more over several years for software that could have been owned outright with a single payment. The subscription model creates a scenario where consumers are locked into an endless cycle of payments. Users who have invested in Macrium Reflect X find themselves in a position where they must continue to pay indefinitely to retain access to software they have already funded. This creates a form of financial slavery, where the consumer's rights to ownership and access are stripped away in favor of corporate profit. The notion that users must pay repeatedly for the same software is not just unfair; it is a betrayal of the trust that consumers place in companies that claim to provide value.

 

2. Erosion of Ownership Rights
 
The subscription model fundamentally alters the concept of ownership. When consumers purchase software outright, they expect to own it indefinitely. However, subscriptions create a scenario where access is contingent on continuous payments. This undermines the principle of ownership and can lead to feelings of disenfranchisement among users who feel they are merely renting software rather than owning it.

 

3. Coercive Payment Structures
 
Many consumers report feeling pressured to maintain subscriptions to avoid losing access to essential tools. This creates a dependency that can be likened to financial coercion, where users are compelled to keep paying to retain access to products they have already fully funded. Such practices can lead to a sense of vulnerability, particularly if users rely on the software for critical tasks.

 

4. Lack of Significant Evolution
 
Often, subscription payment services do not deliver substantial updates or improvements that justify ongoing payments forever.

Users may find themselves paying for features that do not evolve significantly over time, raising ethical questions about the fairness of requiring continuous payments for a service that has already been delivered. Consumers are left questioning: What are they actually paying for?

 

5. Risk of Service Disruption
 
The potential for losing access to software due to missed payments poses a significant risk. This uncertainty can be particularly troubling for businesses that depend on specific software for their operations. The fear of service disruption can create anxiety and hinder productivity, as users must constantly monitor their subscription status.

 

6. Ethical Concerns
 
Companies that utilize open-source components have an ethical responsibility to their users. By imposing a subscription model, Macrium Reflect X not only prioritizes corporate profits over consumer welfare but also betrays the foundational principles of open-source software. The expectation that users should pay indefinitely for access to software that incorporates freely shared technology is fundamentally at odds with the values of openness, collaboration, and community support that underpin the open-source movement.

 

7. Consumer Fatigue and Backlash
 
As subscription fatigue sets in, consumers are becoming increasingly wary of ongoing payment models. Many are seeking alternatives that offer more transparency and value. This shift in consumer sentiment can lead to a backlash against companies that rely heavily on subscription services, potentially harming their long-term viability.

 

8. Utilization of Open Source Code

 

Macrium Reflect X has been noted for leveraging open-source code [1], which is freely available and shared among developers.

By adopting open-source principles for its backup files, Macrium Reflect X emphasizes user ownership of data. Users can access their backups without being locked into proprietary formats that may become obsolete or unsupported over time. This aligns with the core tenets of open-source software, which advocate for user freedom and control over their own data.

 

This raises a fundamental question: how can a business ethically impose subscription fees on software that incorporates open-source components?

If the underlying technology is built upon freely available code, it seems contradictory to charge consumers continuously for access to a product that is partially derived from community-driven resources.

 

Additionally, when software is locked behind a paywall, it limits the community's ability to build upon or improve the code. Open-source projects thrive on community contributions, leading to rapid advancements and enhancements. In contrast, proprietary software often becomes stagnant, as users are discouraged from sharing insights or modifications due to the restrictive nature of subscription services.

 

Many users expect that software utilizing open-source components, especially those that are freely available, should not impose ongoing subscription fees. This expectation stems from the principles of open-source software, which advocate for user freedom and access.

 

9. Exploitation of Open Source Code

 

Macrium Reflect X leverages open-source components, which are built upon the collaborative efforts of countless developers who contribute their work for the benefit of the community. By charging a subscription fee for software that heavily relies on these freely available resources, Macrium is effectively capitalizing on the labor of others.

This practice not only undermines the spirit of open-source collaboration but also raises questions about the morality of profiting from software that is fundamentally designed to be accessible to all.

 

10. Societal Impact

 

The implications of such business practices extend beyond individual consumers. By normalizing subscription models for software that relies on open-source components, Macrium Reflect X contributes to a broader trend that threatens to erode consumer rights and ownership across the software industry. This shift can lead to a society where access to essential tools and technologies is contingent upon ongoing financial commitments, creating barriers for those who cannot afford to pay.

 

In conclusion, the subscription model employed by Macrium Reflect X, particularly in light of its use of open-source components, raises serious ethical questions about fairness, consumer rights, and corporate responsibility. By leveraging the work of others for selfish gain, Macrium Relect X not only undermines the principles of open-source collaboration but also risks locking consumers into a cycle of financial dependency.

 

It is crucial for society to advocate for more equitable practices that prioritize the needs and freedoms of consumers, ensuring that access to technology remains a right rather than a privilege. By raising awareness of these issues, we can encourage a shift towards more sustainable and fair payment models in the software industry.

 

 

---------------------

[1] Macrium has made some of its file layout specifications available on platforms like GitHub, where users can access the code and documentation. This repository allows developers to explore the underlying architecture of the backup files, fostering a community of users who can build upon or adapt the technology for their own needs.

Macrium Reflect X backup files are licensed as follows;

■ MIT License. (C++ toolkit for JSON for Modern C++. nlohmann/jso)

■ BSD-style license. (Zstandard - high performance compression algorithm developed by Facebook, Inc.)

■ GPLv2 License. (Zstandard - high performance compression algorithm developed by Facebook, Inc.)

Note: The GNU General Public License (GPL) requires that any derivative work also be open source. While it is legal to use GPL-licensed software, if Macrium Reflect incorporates GPL components, it must comply with the GPL terms, which may include making its own source code available if it distributes the software.

■ zlib License. (unobtrusive compression library)

■ Apache-style license. (OpenSSL)

Original: https://github.com/MacriumBeta/mrimg_file_layout

Current: https://github.com/macrium/mrimgx_file_layout

[Matt]

@Priyanka Chopra This is more of software chat than software update. Software update forum has its own template and guidelines that must be followed. 

 

Your topic moved to here, and this software is a FP listed and can't be post on software update forum. Moreover, it was already posted.

 

 

[coopers]

while I agree that subscription method sucks, the reasoning in these articles is pretty ridiculous, especially it talks about corporate greed :-)

The root cause that capitalisms is successful is that it assumes all (or most if not all) people are greedy.

That's the reason that the price of an item in east coast and west coast is the virtually same - because if there is a price difference, some people will move the item from one side to another side to profit from the price difference if the profit is higher than cheapest shipping cost. 

 

Back to this subscription based software thing, if you don't like it, just don't use it. If more and more people don't use it, the software company will go down or change.  If the company doesn't go down or change, it means such method works. So deal with it. 

[Nuclear Fallout]

At least we will be surely getting a LOT of updates from now on.  Think of it as End User Hell.

[BluePT]

I used Macrium Reflect in the past. Now I use R-Drive Image in home (cracked) and in office (paid) and I'm very happy with the change.

[funkyy]

This is the world in which we live "Greed is good, greed works"....never a truer word has been spoken.

We consumers are the sheep to be herded into paying ever-increasing prices over and over again for

the same products and services. Coincidental that Covid appeared and immediately prices increased

on everything that we consume....any excuse to raise prices is a good excuse.

People are greedy to a certain degree...but Corporate Business is an insatiable beast that gorges on money.

It has no soul, no conscience and no pity. It continually invents new strategies to suck up profit...after all,those

BMW's and luxury yachts don't pay for themselves. In the Middle Ages there was a huge financial gulf between

the peasants and the "high class"....that has not changed in the centuries that have passed. The methods of the

rich to get richer have simply evolved and improved. 

[coopers]

1 hour ago, funkyy said:

This is the world in which we live "Greed is good, greed works"....never a truer word has been spoken.

We consumers are the sheep to be herded into paying ever-increasing prices over and over again for

the same products and services. Coincidental that Covid appeared and immediately prices increased

on everything that we consume....any excuse to raise prices is a good excuse.

People are greedy to a certain degree...but Corporate Business is an insatiable beast that gorges on money.

It has no soul, no conscience and no pity. It continually invents new strategies to suck up profit...after all,those

BMW's and luxury yachts don't pay for themselves. In the Middle Ages there was a huge financial gulf between

the peasants and the "high class"....that has not changed in the centuries that have passed. The methods of the

rich to get richer have simply evolved and improved. 

well, for-profit company exists for only one purpose: to maximize the value of company shareholders.  Otherwise, why would shareholders invest their money into this company? 

If you can understand that, you will not be surprised. 

Also if you look at current male billionaires, most of them became billionaire by their own hard work, not by inheriting money from their parents. Elon Musk as an example.