Jump to content

New Zealand to move all “covid cases” to “Quarantine Centres”


dufus

Recommended Posts

 

The New Zealand government announced yesterday that ALL cases of Sars-Cov-2 infection “are to be managed in a quarantine facility”.

 

Health Director-General Dr Ashley Bloomfield made the announcements in a press conference yesterday (August 12th). As of today, New Zealand has 36 active cases* of alleged coronavirus infection. That has not prevented the government from locking down Auckland, the countries largest city.

 

Under Section 70 of the Health Act, the NZ government has the power to compel people into quarantine against their will. According to a report from stuff.co.nz quarantine centres have – among other things – “more stringent security” than isolation hotels.

 

According to Dr Broomfield the new quarantine rules:

 

"Will apply to all test-positive cases and also family members who may be at risk, where appropriate."

 

A reminder that the PCR tests are incredibly unreliable and can return very large numbers of false-positive results.

 

Nevertheless, if you are in NZ, get a positive test or have any respiratory symptoms, you and your family will be forcibly taken to a “quarantine” camp. How long for and if you will leave alive is anyone’s guess.

 

How long before other countries start doing this?

 

How long before a “positive PCR” is the excuse for shipping all the dissidents and the non-compliant off to “quarantine”, where, sadly, that darn corona sees them off?

source

 

five eyes ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 3
  • Views 553
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Nuclear Fallout
1 hour ago, dufus said:

How long before a “positive PCR” is the excuse for shipping all the dissidents and the non-compliant off to “quarantine”, where, sadly, that darn corona sees them off?

source

 

five eyes ...

 

 

Frankly, I am too tired to to respond in full.

 

However, there was around 1980, 1981, or 1982 a treaty which said:

 

We the undersigned agree that we do not use our Armed Forces against civilian population of our countries.

 

There were only three counties which said NO (did not sign):

 

USA

Russia

Germany

 

With regards the glorious five, all bets are off.

 

THOSE OF US WHO HAVE MILITARY BACKGROUND HAVE A BETTER CHANCE TO SURVIVE THIS THEN THE CIVILIANS!

 

Very few of you have ANY idea what is in store for you!!!

 

I went through a Gvt test, using an alias, the scenario was VERY, VERY VIVID.

 

I had to think like a soldier, not like a civilian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Nuclear Fallout
1 hour ago, dufus said:

people need to start thinking ..... rapidly !

 

 

YOU mean:

 

Don't think what you can do for the Government (aka the Country).

 

Think what  the Government can do to YOU!!!

 

In  most cases, wishful thinking.

 

Americans are definitely not up to specs. Had a run in (recently) with someone who claimed to be ex-Military Intelligence.

Still too high nosed, not knowing certain things, generally a person who felt very, very cocky! On top of that he mocked me.

And those guys we are trusting  with our security.

 

Anyway, the time is running out for the fools. 

 

I just wish I have a run in with such a person again.

 

One guy said to me once about the cultural divide, if you drop your high nose, THEN we can start to talk to each other.

 

Time will tell how this all works out.

 

Either Paradise, or Dante's Inferno!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...