Jump to content

Inside 'Project Indigo,'


humble3d

Recommended Posts

Inside 'Project Indigo,'


the quiet info-sharing program between banks and U.S. Cyber Command...


WHAT WAS NOT REVEALED IS THAT HACKERS CAN READ YOUR COOKIES AND
STEAL YOU INFORMATION USING QUANTUM COMPUTERS...


Quantum computing


 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computing

 

THAT IS WHY IT IS VITAL YOU DELETE YOUR COOKIES REGULARLY...


A confidential information-sharing agreement between the Financial Services

Information Sharing and Analysis Center (FS-ISAC) and U.S. Cyber Command

reveals the blurring line between the country’s public and private sectors

as the U.S. government becomes increasingly receptive to launching offensive

hacking operations.

 

The pilot program, codenamed “Project Indigo,” recently established an

information-sharing channel for a subunit of FS-ISAC known as the Financial

Systemic Analysis & Resilience Center (FSARC).

 

That subunit shares “scrubbed” cyberthreat data, including malware

indicators, with the Fort Mead-based Cyber Command, according to current and

former U.S. officials.

 

The broad purpose of Project Indigo is to help inform U.S. Cyber Command

about nation-state hacking aimed at banks.

 

In practice, this intelligence is independently evaluated and, if

appropriate, Cyber Command responds under its own unique authorities.

 

It’s possible that a bank could tip off the military about a cyberattack

against the financial industry, prompting Cyber Command to react and take

action.

 

That could include providing unique insight back to FSARC or even taking

offensive measures to disrupt the attacker — such as retaliatory hacking —

if it’s appropriate and the Pentagon approves it, according to current and

former U.S. officials.

 

The program is currently organized in a fairly informal manner, but

participants have been discussing a more formal arrangement.

 

Eight financial institutions are involved in FSARC: Bank of America, BNY

Mellon, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, State

Street and Wells Fargo.

 

 Project Indigo also provides data to the Department of Homeland Security

and U.S. Treasury.

 

However, those agencies were already getting data from the banks that is

narrowly leveraged for defensive measures.

 

In an emailed statement, a Cyber Command spokesperson acknowledged Project

Indigo’s existence.

 

“The pilot began in 2017 with USCYBERCOM personnel receiving sector-specific

exposure to risks facing critical financial payment systems, and observing

exercises related to risk mitigation and recovery around realistic

scenarios,” said Cyber Command spokesperson Col. Daniel King.

 

“Later, two samples of anonymized cyber threat information were shared with

USCYBERCOM to allow the government and its critical infrastructure partners

the ability to jointly assess and address emerging threats.”

 


“No Personally identifiable Information (PII) was shared with USCYBERCOM as

part of this effort,” King added.

 

The financial institutions that participate in the arrangement gave consent

to FSARC to share the data with the U.S. government, a person familiar with

the effort told CyberScoop.

 

Sources spoke on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of

the program.

 

In one recent case, FSARC gave Cyber Command a “combo of open-source derived

IOCs [indicators of compromise] associated with DPRK [North Korea] and some

observed,” one source said. “Open source” in this case means from outside a

financial institution, while “observed” refers to internal data.

 

Under the agreement, financial institutions share data “considered not

exclusive” to any one financial firm, a former U.S. official said.

 

Another source familiar with the program said that it was challenged by the

simple fact that the banks weren’t yet “interested in sharing at a level

which would be truly useful [for Cyber Command].”

 

An October 2016 press release originally announcing FSARC explained that its

mission is to “proactively identify, analyze, assess and coordinate

activities to mitigate systemic risk to the U.S. financial system from

current and emerging cyber security threats through focused operations and

enhanced collaboration between participating firms, industry partners, and

the U.S. government.”

 

That announcement specifically described “government partners” as Treasury,

DHS and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, but it did not mention U.S.

Cyber Command or the National Security Agency.

 

Wells Fargo, Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase did not respond to multiple

requests for comment.

 

The Office of the Direction of National Intelligence and NSA deferred to

Cyber Command for comment.

 

It’s widely known that large financial institutions face a bevy of

sophisticated cyberattacks from both nation states and well-equipped

criminal groups.

 

Organized as a private non-profit organization, the FS-ISAC sits at the

center of this activity, collecting and sharing information between

companies so they can be collectively informed about active cyberthreats.

 

The collected data can often be extremely sensitive. Not only does it

contain malware indicators, but sometimes other sensitive information tied

to the targeted institutions.

 

As a result, the intelligence is usually both highly valuable for defenders

and potentially dangerous if it’s ever made public.

 

In an emailed statement, an FS-ISAC spokesperson said: “[Project Indigo]

focuses on sharing cyberthreat intelligence related to key threats facing

systemically important critical infrastructure operators, with the intention

of protecting our financial institutions, their networks and their clients.


 No customer information has been shared with the U.S. Government under

Project Indigo.”

 

While it’s common for businesses to voluntarily provide federal agencies

with information about incidents in cyberspace, the 2013 Edward Snowden

leaks chilled these types of relationships, especially between private

companies and intelligence agencies.

 

Cyber Command is not an intelligence unit, but it maintains a close

relationship with the NSA, including sharing the same leader and building.

 

Jason Healey, a former intelligence officer and current senior research

scholar at Columbia University’s School for International and Public

Affairs, told CyberScoop he believed Project Indigo represented a pragmatic

step forward.

 

“We need to be prepared for there to be a role, especially in time critical

incidents, for Cyber Command to contribute so long as they are also

coordinating with Treasury and [DHS],” said Healey.

 

Blurring government boundaries


Project Indigo raises questions about the existing hierarchy in government

and whether decision-makers see a need for the military to be more

integrated with the private sector on cybersecurity.

 

Over the last eight years, the Defense Department’s role in working with

private companies on cybersecurity has fluctuated significantly.

 

During the Obama administration, the government took steps to make DHS the

lead on public-private partnerships.

 

This push was boosted in 2015, when Congress passed the Cybersecurity

Information Sharing Act (CISA).

 

The law gave certain liability protections to private companies whenever

they shared cyberthreat data with the government through a portal managed by

DHS.

 

The decision to embolden DHS with CISA came after there was a public outcry

over privacy concerns.

 

Just two years after the Snowden leaks, critics worried that the Defense

Department would mishandle CISA.

 

A current U.S. official described Project Indigo as “classic mission creep,”

a term used to describe when one agency oversteps its boundaries in regards

to another agency’s program.

 

But experts contend that Cyber Command’s role will need to evolve if it’s to

reach its full potential.

 

Additionally, the military is already involved in other information sharing

initiatives with the private sector.

 

In December, a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report called on the

Defense Department, including Cyber Command, to clarify and further define

how it interacts with companies and civilian agencies.

 

“DOD was supposed to develop [a] comprehensive plan for CYBERCOM to support

civil authorities in responding to cyberattacks.

 

DOD has rigorous requirements for what plans should look like, and this

didn’t match,”  Joseph Kirschbaum, director of GAO’s Defense Capabilities

and Management office, previously told CyberScoop.

 

Congress is currently weighing what role Cyber Command should play in

protecting private companies from hackers.

 

In the past, members of the Senate Armed Service Committee have advocated

for the military to be more involved.

 

Last summer, Lt. General Vincent Stewart, the current deputy commander of

Cyber Command, said he would like the military to be able to reverse-

engineer malware samples in order to create new hacking tools.

 

“Once we’ve isolated malware, I want to reengineer it and prep to use it

against the same adversary who sought to use it against us,” Stewart

described.

 

The practice is already well known inside NSA, based on leaked classified

documents.

 

Generally speaking, the military’s relationship with the banks is still

evolving.

 

During the Cyber Command Strategy Conference earlier this year, a high

ranking Cyber Command official remarked on stage that “if J.P. Morgan wants

to meet us halfway, then that would mean us monitoring their networks [for

malicious cyber activity],” according to two individuals who attended the

February event.

 

The comment stunned some audience members, although former NSA Director Gen.

Keith Alexander had said something very similar in 2013.

 

-In thiStory-
banking, banks, breach, Cyber Command, cybersecurity, FS-ISAC, FSARC,

hacking, information sharing, intelligence collection, news, North Korea,

NSA, Project Indigo, public-private partnership, secret

https://www.cyberscoop.com/project-indigo-fs-isac-cyber-command-
information-sharing-dhs

 

RELATED NEWS BELOW...


HEALTH CARE NEWS:

https://www.cyberscoop.com/news/healthcare/

Allscripts faces lawsuit after ransomware attack impacts doctors' offices

across U.S.

https://www.cyberscoop.com/allscripts-lawsuit-cybersecurity-samsam-
ransomware/?category_news=healthcare

 

Hackers steal PII and payment info of thousands of California residents in

company breach
 

https://www.cyberscoop.com/csc-california-data-breach/

A software vulnerability could have been used to siphon over $15 million

from Mexican banks

https://www.cyberscoop.com/software-vulnerability-used-siphon-15-million-
mexican-banks/

 

'TeleGrab' malware again shows how hackers can evade encryption to read

private messages

https://www.cyberscoop.com/telegram-telegrab-malware-talos/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 3
  • Views 483
  • Created
  • Last Reply

[looking at watch]... Is it too late for suicide?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, jabrwky said:

[looking at watch]... Is it too late for suicide?

NEVER GIVE UP...

LIFE ITSELF IS A TEMPORARY ASSIGNMENT...

DO WHAT GOOD AND ENJOY WHAT GOOD YOU CAN...  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...