Research: Google Search Manipulation Can Swing Nearly 80 Percent of Undecided Voters

[tao]

By inserting negative search suggestions under the name of a candidate, search engines like Google can shift the opinions of undecided voters by up to 43.4 percent, according to new research by a team at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology and reported exclusively by Breitbart News.

 

The lead author of the study, Dr. Robert Epstein, has previously conducted research into what he calls the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). This research showed that the manipulation of results pages in search engines can shift the voting preferences of undecideds by anywhere between 20 and 80 percent, depending on the demographic.

 

His latest research looks at how search engines can affect voters by suggesting negative or positive search terms when a political candidate’s name is entered into the search bar. Dr. Epstein’s research found that when negative search terms are suggested for a candidate, it can have a dramatic effect on voter opinion.

From the study:

The voting preferences of participants who saw no search suggestions shifted toward the favored candidate by 37.1%. The voting preferences of participants in the search suggestion groups who saw only positive search suggestions shifted similarly (35.6%). However, the voting preferences of participants who saw three positive search suggestions and one negative search suggestion barely shifted (1.8%); this occurred because the negative search suggestion attracted more than 40% of the clicks (negativity bias). In other words, a single negative search suggestion can impact opinions dramatically. Participants who were shown four negative suggestions (and no positives) shifted away from the candidate shown in the search bar (-43.4%).

The researchers conclude that by using this method of manipulation, search engines can shift a “50/50 split split among people who are undecided on an issue to a 90/10 split without people’s awareness and without leaving a paper trail for authorities to follow.”

 

The conclusions are based on 16 months of experiments conducted with a total of 1,800 people from all 50 U.S. states. Participants in the study came from diverse ideological backgrounds, including liberal, conservative, and moderate. In order to control prior biases, participants were asked to judge political candidates that they were unfamiliar with.

 

Further on in the paper, the researchers reference allegations of search suggestion manipulation made against Google during the 2016 election, when the tech giant appeared to be suppressing negative search suggestions for Hillary Clinton while allowing negative suggestions for Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders to remain.

 

The research also notes discrepancies with Google’s current search suggestions, particularly with regards to its commercial interests. For example, entering “G” into the search bar in Google will instantly provide users with suggestions to click on search terms about other Google products – Gmail, Google Maps, Google Drive, and others.

The resarchers also found a recurring pattern of major brands being favored in Google search suggestions if they were financially linked to Google. The top search suggestions for “a” is Amazon – Google’s top client on Google Adwords, the company’s digital advertising service. The top search suggestion for “t” is Target – Google’s third-biggest advertising client.

 

According to the research summary, “The same pattern occurs for other major advertisers on Google, among them Best Buy, Home Depot, Lowe’s, and Zillow.”

 

“The only companies that are shortchanged by this arrangement are those with names beginning with ‘g.'”

 

< Here >

[LeeSmithG]

Google and it's not my quote but quotes I have read ''are the evil of the internet''.

 

Get your crosses and garlic out when you surf!

[csmdew]

But manipulation of ppl is definitely done by the media, so swaying votes happens. Also PACs buying votes happen as well. 

[humble3d]

The Nazi-fascists are storming the gates... 

[luisam]

This article is just a commonplace comment of some Google-hater. Actually you can manipule undecided voters practically with ANY media, including cooking recipes, handouts, placards, banners, buttons, speeches of the candidate and of course alienated TV news channels, newspapers, political and nonpolitical magazines etc etc etc.... This is not news and not a secret.

So Google MIGHT manipulate votes. But actually, does Google manipulate votes? I use Gmail, use Google search, have installed Google drive,  have that useless Google +,  sometime watch videos on YouTube and never felt that Google was trying to manipulate my political tendency. They talk about negative search suggestions for Hillary Clinton. Well, it is a fact that there was much more negative information and comments against Trump and Shaw and obviously had no great effect for Trump!

Now, if you can show me how to manipulate the vote of DECIDED voters, that might be a really some great news!

[Reefa]

Quote

This forum revolves around topics of a technical nature, which happen to be discussed by people from many nationalities, etnicities and political backgrounds. In order to focus on what unities us all, rather than what divides us, cultural, national and/or political issues are not to be discussed. Members engaging in such discussions will receive a warning.

 

Thread closed..