ISIS fighters dress up as WOMEN with make-up and padded bras in desperate bid to flee Mosul

[Sylence]

ISIS will be gone if saudi terrorists stop funding them and killing civilians in the Yemen. 

 

I'm wondering if saudis ever have anything of themselves. their military are hired from other terrorist countries. even their fishermen are Indian...wtf?

 

Iran seizes Saudi Arabian fishing boat and arrests crew as tensions escalate in Persian Gulf

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iran-saudi-arabia-fishing-boat-arrests-crew-revolutionary-guard-persian-gulf-latest-a7854951.html

 

and they are very good liars. capturing fisherman and claiming them to be IRGC. lol you will shit your pants if you see IRGC. 

 

The conversation I had with some of the people in there, mostly youth in my age, said they are gonna leave the country after school cuz they can't endure that shithole full of liars and idiots.

[ThisPC666]

1 hour ago, Salafi said:

So you're telling me that Duterte does not have the courage to tell American planes to go home?

 

In my opinion, I really think that Duterte helped IS's implementation in Phillipines. Using terrorist groups to give themselves more power, a technique commonly used by dictators in Arab countries.

 

thats a possibility. 

[Salafi]

14 minutes ago, saeed_dc said:

ISIS will be gone if saudi terrorists stop funding them and killing civilians in the Yemen. 

 

Yet the Iraqi government clearly needs the help of the Saudis to fight terrorism.

 

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/gulf/2017/07/21/Saudi-Arabia-and-Iraq-announce-agreement-to-exchange-intelligence-.html

[Phantomboxe]

24 minutes ago, Salafi said:

@Phantomboxe

I do not know what you're trying to show by copying this article, but you really have to be blind not to see the dictator Duterte's craving for ever-growing power.

Very sad, don't judge people you never been met. Duterte killing ISIS,Criminals and you call him a Dictator? you need to look first in your country of what they have done in Syria. maybe it will good to start investigating your own violations of so many civilians killed in Syria.

[Salafi]

2 minutes ago, Phantomboxe said:

Very sad, don't judge people you never been met. Duterte killing ISIS,Criminals and you call him a Dictator? you need to look first in your country of what they have done in Syria. maybe it will good to start investigating your own violations of so many civilians killed in Syria.

You know that the Al Qaeda branch in Syria has been at war with ISIS since 2014? Fighting ISIS does not make people angels.

[ThisPC666]

2 minutes ago, Phantomboxe said:

Very sad, don't judge people you never been met. Duterte killing ISIS,Criminals and you call him a Dictator? you need to look first in your country of what they have done in Syria. maybe it will good to start investigating your own violations of so many civilians killed in Syria.

 

u need to be objective. dont be blinded. 

[Sylence]

57 minutes ago, Salafi said:

 

Yet the Iraqi government clearly needs the help of the Saudis to fight terrorism.

 

http://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/gulf/2017/07/21/Saudi-Arabia-and-Iraq-announce-agreement-to-exchange-intelligence-.html

 

what a b.s. of course alarabiya or whatever it is publishes these lies for some arabian countries to lie to them. Iraq became free with the help of first, Brave IRAQI people Sunni + Shia ALL together fighting side by side, and then IRAN and Sepah. that's all. nobody can tell otherwise cuz that will be obvious lie and true bullshit. 

[steven36]

19 hours ago, saeed_dc said:

they thought it only takes few weeks for Iraq army and People to surrender but it actually took more than a decade for them to get out of Iraq when they faced the brave Iraqi peoples' resistance.

They never thought that, this War was a front to get most all the outside terrorist away from the states.  It was never a war of great importance too the USA  ..In real wars  the USA  implies a draft and everybody that's  young adult who is not rich , or has certain religious beliefs or runs too some other country will be made too fight. Every since July 4, 1776 if they are really at war they draft young people, this never happened in no war in the middle east... it's not really as important too them as you may think. Only people who died in this so called war against terrorism in the military signed up for it.

[Sylence]

24 minutes ago, steven36 said:

They never thought that, this War was a front to get most all the outside terrorist away from the states.  It was never a war of great importance too the USA  ..In real wars  the USA  implies a draft and everybody that's  young adult who is not rich , or has certain religious beliefs or runs too some other country will be made too fight. Every since July 4, 1776 if they are really at war they draft young people, this never happened in no war in the middle east... it's not really as important too them as you may think. Only people who died in this so called war against terrorism in the military signed up for it.

 

now that U.S screwed up there and lost you say it wasn't important for them? so losing lives of their army personnel is no big deal, got it, what a great country.

 

keep terrorists away from the states? it was a wrong front my friend, it was all lies. the real front they need to fight against terrorism is not Iraq, it's in the occupied Palestine. how many 9/11 terrorists came from Iraq? None. 

[steven36]

1 minute ago, saeed_dc said:

 

now that U.S screwed up there and lost you say it wasn't important for them? so losing lives of their army personnel is no big deal, got it, what a great country.

 

keep terrorists away from the states? it was a wrong front my friend, it was all lies. the real front they need to fight against terrorism is not Iraq, it's in the occupied Palestine. how many 9/11 terrorists came from Iraq? None. 

 

They dont think those wars over there are important enough too lose great numbers of Americans. Same reason they left Vietnam in the end  and never would even give them the soldiers they needed even though they drafted back then.

[Sylence]

1 minute ago, steven36 said:

 

They dont think those wars over there are important enough too lose great numbers of Americans. Same reason they left Vietnam in the  and never would even give them the soldiers they needed even though they drafted back then.

 

It's a lot more complicated than that. with Iraq, they Intended to come to the middle east and it was just the beginning, but they faced resistance of Iraq and Iran. they very well knew that if they deploy more troops then there will be more troops deployed by Iran because they came to our borders and it's our responsibility to maintain peace in the region, not a country's from 10 000 KMs away.

[steven36]

4 minutes ago, saeed_dc said:

 

It's a lot more complicated than that. with Iraq, they Intended to come to the middle east and it was just the beginning, but they faced resistance of Iraq and Iran. they very well knew that if they deploy more troops then there will be more troops deployed by Iran because they came to our borders and it's our responsibility to maintain peace in the region, not a country's from 10 000 KMs away.

They was never no war the USA went into they thought would last a few days that is just delusional all wars the USA has been in have lasted more than a day unless it was just a drive by mission  and if they really cared they would impose a draft and have a real war but they don't .

[Sylence]

2 minutes ago, steven36 said:

They wa never no war the USA went into they thought would last a day that is just delusional all wars the USA has been in have lasted more than a day unless it was just a drive by mission  and if they really cared they would impose a draft and have a real war but they don't .

 

I'm wondering why you say a day. 

it was a kind of war suitable for that area. it wasn't a full scale war because Iraq didn't target neither directly nor indirectly american soil so that's why it happened like that, however it doesn't decrease its importance. every war is important, the Iraqi war, Vietnam, Syria, they are all important and have consequences and U.S knows this.

[steven36]

14 minutes ago, saeed_dc said:

 

I'm wondering why you say a day. 

it was a kind of war suitable for that area. it wasn't a full scale war because Iraq didn't target neither directly nor indirectly american soil so that's why it happened like that, however it doesn't decrease its importance. every war is important, the Iraqi war, Vietnam, Syria, they are all important and have consequences and U.S knows this.

All wars they face resistance that is just part of war  and many have went on for years. The USA has even fight against each other before in that war the North had all the solders they needed but still the South gave them harsh resistance even though they had 10 soldiers too the Souths 1 .. You act like resistance is new too war ? But it as old as war itself. The USA was founded on blood shed .   

[Sylence]

14 minutes ago, steven36 said:

All wars they face resistance that is just part of war  and many have went on for years. The USA has even fight against each other before in that war the North had all the solders they needed but still the South gave them harsh resistance even though they had 10 soldiers too the Souths 1 .. You act like resistance is new too war ? But it as old as war itself.

 

Resistance is not new, U.S losing wars is new and shocking to them. they can't do anything they want in the world anymore. they didn't expect any of the events happened during the Iraq invasion or else american lives wouldn't be wasted by now but it was fair and they deserved more, because they chose the wrong enemy, they still do. Iran and the Islamic revolution was founded on a river of pure blood of 500 000 martyrs who died for this country.

[steven36]

10 minutes ago, saeed_dc said:

 

Resistance is not new, U.S losing wars is new and shocking to them. they can't do anything they want in the world anymore. they didn't expect any of the events happened during the Iraq invasion or else american lives wouldn't be wasted by now but it was fair and they deserved more, because they chose the wrong enemy, they still do. 

Not really,  they not really won a war since World War 2  and that they didn't really want too get into and they had help from other super powers .. Most Wars they fighted  before World War 1 were on USA soil  there is a big difference in fighting for freedom than fighting for some other reason ..

[Sylence]

4 minutes ago, steven36 said:

Not really they not really won a war since World War 2 that they didn't really want too get into and they had help from other super powers .. Most Wars the fighted  before World War 1 were on USA soil  there is a big difference in fighting for freedom than fighting for some other reason ..

 

Yes exactly

[steven36]

1 hour ago, saeed_dc said:

 

Yes exactly

All wars , drafts or whatever since World War 2 was not fully supported by the USA people ..If you send people too war that don't think the cause is right.. There is no wining a war like this. It's just like those Men and Women in the Military today most are just doing it for a paycheck . Some of my family retired happily from the Military during peace time and never had too kill anyone .

 

A lot of  it has too do with keeping the rich wealthy witch i hate .. Why should we support Wars that protect fossil fuel trade ? Instead of investing in wars too buy oil they should be investing in electric cars technology. Most of the USA don't depend on oil  too heat and cool there homes anymore  and we need too stop using Oil altogether .

 

Whenever the USA decides to start making people go too  war that are not just doing it for a paycheck again and for the Country itself .. I will acknowledge there is a real war that don't mean i will agree to the war . It's not the USA job to make sure the world stay free.. they need too revolt like we did  under British rule if they have a problem with there government. Trump needs too hold too his word no  more free rides, they need too at lest pay the USA for protection .  If some Country want too threaten us and our freedom  then I'm even willing fight for my Country .

[dufus]

5 hours ago, Salafi said:

When you said : "90% people in the PH loves Duterte." It reminds me of the democratic elections in Syria ...

point being have elections

[dufus]

3 hours ago, Salafi said:

Yet the Iraqi government clearly needs the help of the Saudis to fight terrorism.

Once Again, Saudi Funding for Foreign Terrorism May be Hidden from Public https://sputniknews.com/military/201706011054176612-saudi-terror-funding-kept-secret/

Terror funding report: Calls grow for release of 'sensitive' Home Office document 'pointing finger at Saudi Arabia' https://www.independent.co.uk/News/uk/terror-funding-report-home-office-saudi-arabia-jihadis-attacks-suppress-tory-uk-release-sensitive-a7773146.html

UK report: Saudis funding “extremism,” May accused of coverup, “kowtowing” to Saudis

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/07/uk-report-saudis-funding-extremism-may-accused-of-coverup-kowtowing-to-saudis

 

 

[software182]

Those "women", they seem legit to me, what do you all think ?  

[dufus]

7 minutes ago, software182 said:

Those "women", they seem legit to me, what do you all think ?  

they will do

[dufus]

5 hours ago, Phantomboxe said:

Duterte

Philippines’ Duterte says will never visit ‘lousy’ United States

http://www.govtslaves.com/philippines-duterte-says-will-never-visit-lousy-united-states/

 

i like his style and do not fly small aircraft mr duterte 

[pc71520]

1 hour ago, software182 said:

Those "women", they seem legit to me, what do you all think ?  

These "ladies" fully deserve a hardcore...  

[Salafi]

3 hours ago, dufus said:

Once Again, Saudi Funding for Foreign Terrorism May be Hidden from Public https://sputniknews.com/military/201706011054176612-saudi-terror-funding-kept-secret/

Terror funding report: Calls grow for release of 'sensitive' Home Office document 'pointing finger at Saudi Arabia' https://www.independent.co.uk/News/uk/terror-funding-report-home-office-saudi-arabia-jihadis-attacks-suppress-tory-uk-release-sensitive-a7773146.html

UK report: Saudis funding “extremism,” May accused of coverup, “kowtowing” to Saudis

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/07/uk-report-saudis-funding-extremism-may-accused-of-coverup-kowtowing-to-saudis

 

 

The press says everything and everything. In no case it can be considered as a proof.
 

Russia is sending weapons to Taliban

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2017/04/24/russia-is-sending-weapons-to-taliban-top-u-s-general-confirms/

 

Leaked documents from ISIS headquarters show terror group and Syrian dictator Assad colluded over the city of Palmyra with warnings to withdraw forces before attacks

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3569934/Leaked-documents-ISIS-headquarters-terror-group-Syrian-dictator-Assad-colluded-city-Palmyra.html

 

Saudi Arabia itself accuses its neighbors Qatar and Iran of being the financiers of terrorism, but this is by no means a proof.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/06/05/saudi-arabia-allies-break-diplomatic-ties-qatar-links-terror/

Finally I will quote the words of an expert in geopolitics:

 

"When the question of the state supports IS, often comes back Saudi Arabia.
These accusations are based on a classic argument that recalls the role of Riyadh in Afghanistan during the war between the mujahedeen and the Soviet army (1979-1989), and in concert with Washington. Even the al-Qaida embryo, Maktab al-Khadamat or Service Office, created by Abdallah Azzam and Osama bin Laden, had benefited indirectly from this aid. Can we therefore conclude that Riyadh and Washington were the sponsors of the September 11, 2001 attacks? No.

While it is clear that Saudi Arabia has assisted and supported Islamist groups and factions in Syria, it can not be concluded that Riyadh is now the sponsor of the territorial expansion of ISIS on both sides of the border. Conversely, as early as 2007, the Saudi monarchy and its services played a decisive role in the creation and financing of the Sunni Awakening Forces (Sahwat) in Iraq, whose aim was to fight Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia And its emanation, the Islamic State.

Since the end of 2013, Riyadh has directly and exclusively supported the Syrian factions fighting the IS. It should be remembered that since 2003, the Saudi monarchy has been engaged in a strategy to combat and contain jihadist movements inside and outside its borders. This is evident in his efforts to expel AI-Qaeda from the Arabian Peninsula (AQPA) and to fight it in neighboring Yemen. The Saudi media are also in open war against Al-Qaeda and ISIS. Saudi religious authorities almost daily enact fatwas prohibiting their compatriots from joining jihadist groups. Saudi jails are populated by returning jihadists, jihadist aspirants, and even jihad supporters who have no proven link with any organization.
Saudi religious leaders are at the forefront of the ideological war against jihadists, examples are not lacking. As such, nomhreux are those who are found on the kill-lists"

(Excerpts from the book of Wassim Nasr: ISIS, The accomplished fact.)