BillyClub Posted February 26, 2017 Share Posted February 26, 2017 Unless I missed a setting, the biggest difference I notice is that when I transfer a folder that has 4 fairly large files the bar at the top when transferring only shows the folder but not the files. Is there a setting to use to get the files to show up when transfering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeSmithG Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 What is the point of this program. I am trying to transfer a folder that is 5.44 gb. I thought I would use TeraCopy three (3). Said it would take nineteen (19) hours, then down to eight (8) hours, then back to twelve (12). So I stopped after one half hour. I decided to use explorer instead and it says it will be finished in ''about one (1) hour''. So what gives with teracopy three (3)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.D Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 On 25/02/2017 at 4:16 PM, steven36 said: 1/.Why? USB 3.1 Gen 1 is no faster then USB 3.0 2. You must perter buying a brand new computer upgrade then that support it happy building if you're talking about USB 3.1 Gen 2 (Speed up to 10Gbps) USB 3.1 Gen 1 & Gen 2 explained https://www.msi.com/blog/usb-3-1-gen1-gen2-explained steven36 - the above article is ~2 years old and things have changed since that was written, USB 3.1 is available on Mobo's with a speed they claim of 10GB/S - the ASUS Z270 range for example https://www.asus.com/Motherboard-Accessory/ThunderboltEX-3/ 38 minutes ago, LeeSmithG said: What is the point of this program. I am trying to transfer a folder that is 5.44 gb. I thought I would use TeraCopy three (3). Said it would take nineteen (19) hours, then down to eight (8) hours, then back to twelve (12). So I stopped after one half hour. I decided to use explorer instead and it says it will be finished in ''about one (1) hour''. So what gives with teracopy three (3)? Something wrong but depending on what file types are in the Folder - I can move or copy 5.44GB in a minute or so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeSmithG Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 1 hour ago, J.D said: steven36 - the above article is ~2 years old and things have changed since that was written, USB 3.1 is available on Mobo's with a speed they claim of 10GB/S - the ASUS Z270 range for example https://www.asus.com/Motherboard-Accessory/ThunderboltEX-3/ Something wrong but depending on what file types are in the Folder - I can move or copy 5.44GB in a minute or so They are text documents around eighty per-cent (80%), rest are ..doc, .html, .pdf and a few .ico. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 1 hour ago, J.D said: steven36 - the above article is ~2 years old and things have changed since that was written, USB 3.1 is available on Mobo's with a speed they claim of 10GB/S - the ASUS Z270 range for example I did not post that to explain the speeds they have no way just it explains that usb 3.1 gen1 is the same thing as usb 3.0 now it says Gen 2 has speeds up to 10Gbps so what you talking about ? Its also posted here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_3.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.D Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 steven36 - Quote it says Gen 2 has speeds up to 10Gbps so what you talking about ? OK, my mistake 27 minutes ago, LeeSmithG said: They are text documents around eighty per-cent (80%), rest are ..doc, .html, .pdf and a few .ico. aaaaaagh, that accounts for it (as I mentioned further ^^ up) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted February 27, 2017 Share Posted February 27, 2017 35 minutes ago, J.D said: steven36 - OK, my mistake but it depends on other factors it dont mean you will get that you have to have a processor that can do that and a 3rd party controller Quote The first USB 3.1 implementation demonstrated real-world transfer speeds of 7.2 Gbit/s Never go by what they say back when they 1st made kabylake they had all this hype about 3.1 gen 2 in the news and it was a flop because Intel still don't support it they never make a native controller so you need a 3rd party controller or a Intel Apple controller.. Quote We expected the 200-series chipsets to feature native support for USB 3.1 10Gbps or maybe even Thunderbolt 3, but no. Instead, motherboard makers will have to add additional chips for those functions. It dont mater witch company they post a bunch of hype before something is released about it and real world test will prove if it's true or not ..Most people who game and buy upgrades a lot are very skeptical at what Intel and AMD say in the press . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
appzter Posted March 10, 2017 Share Posted March 10, 2017 Can anyone here provide some insight as to why Teracopy is better than Ultracopier (which I've been using)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerjack Posted May 15, 2017 Share Posted May 15, 2017 deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted May 21, 2017 Share Posted May 21, 2017 On undefined at 3:04 PM, appzter said: Can anyone here provide some insight as to why Teracopy is better than Ultracopier (which I've been using)? Not very much if you have a working serial Teracopy Pro can also delete files but you can install fastcopy and it will add the delete files shell extension for free .. Ultracopier seems to be faster than Teracopy at moving files . But it has Its downsides. 1. It cant delete files but Teracopy free can't do this ether 2. If you are trying overwrite a lot files at once it will only overwrite one file at a time. 3. I find Teracopy free or Ultracopier usable as long as i install fastcopy to delete files and to replace files in Ultracopier case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.