Jump to content

Do-It-Yourself Online Privacy/Safety Guide


steven36

Recommended Posts

Do It Yourself Online Safety

 

original-6f19f995522e181d2c4542c37eb5a20

 

FACT – If someone is really determined to find you, it isn’t very difficult to track you down especially if they are an abusive partner. Whether using real-life methods or tracing you using technology, it is always possible for someone to find you. Check out this cool test to find out how easily trackable you are.

 

The good news – with Chayn’s DIY Online Safety guide (in 7 languages!), it’s a game you can beat them at! All of this through the helpful guidance of the Chayn Securikitties.

 

 

Written in simple language, the guide will teach you everything you need to know about how you can be tracked – and how to hide your tracks on email, browsers, facebook and other platforms.  This guide can be useful irrespective of your gender, location or situation.

 

 

Read the guide in in English, Arabic, Spanish, French, Farsi, Pashto, Urdu and Russian.

 

p.s. The guide is under a Share Alike 4.0 International license to feel free to use and distribute this!

 

Starter pack

https://chayn.gitbooks.io/basic-diy-online-privacy/content/

 

Advanced guide

https://chayn.gitbooks.io/advanced-diy-privacy-for-every-woman/content/

 

Posted by chayn.co

http://chayn.co/safety/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 10
  • Views 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yes EFF writes some good stuff  for when you are at home but it's very advanced stuff, but if someone is stalking you when you go to work most employers require you too use stuff that can spy on you like skpe , gmail etc that's more or less what the guides are for in the 1st post and to get people started with good privacy hygiene at home .  in a perfect world we can do what we want a 100% of the time or if were our own boss but the reality is for most only this could be practiced half the time because they have too do as there boss ask them ..

 

it's like yesterday, i seen on a forum were someone ask how to protect there privacy using chrome ..Everyone in the comments went on about how you should use tor browser and just Firefox  and the guy replied back he had no choice but too use Chrome because his work required him too so there answers were of no help too the topic starter but just too feed there own ego  .. privacy minded people don't even look at the full picture without debating about it.  Fact is most business ether use iE or Chrome  or both and not many allow Firefox at all. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites


56 minutes ago, SandStone said:

steven36 if possible could you share source of conversation, or send me the link in private. I would like to see the answers.

when i looked there was no real answers just stuff  i already know best to use Firefox  ,tor browser etc. i tired to find the post but they may have deleted it by now since no one was helpful . most stuff posted about privacy i don't find very helpful ..because i been reading it for years and years and comprehend stuff easy  i just still post about it too help people who may  not know yet . if find it i will pm you the link though . ive been dealing with spyware  and crap on windows for   16 years lol  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


15 hours ago, steven36 said:

Fact is most business ether use iE or Chrome  or both and not many allow Firefox at all. .

 

That is not a fact, except maybe in your mind.  We require Firefox and Chrome on all the systems and do not use IE, to which there are no links so users can't use it.   Some of our web based programs work best with Firefox, some with Chrome. And nationwide that is probably about 1.5 million computers.  Plus I know many large corporations and most universities use firefox either as their primary browser or as their second preferred browser.  The problem with security is it is a broad field, and in the last 49 years I have worked in all of it and all aspects of it.  There are no experts in computer security, there are a lot of very knowledgeable people, but the field is too broad to have an expert in other than select specialized areas.  Those of us that started working with computers back in the 60s only had to contend with access to the immediate area as far as security went.  It started to become much broader with the addition of the modem, and then networks, and lastly the internet.  Then in the mid to late 80s we started seeing 'viruses', things that infected our computers and did crazy things.  They would fill your drive up with junk so there was no space left, or they would flip you computer screen upside down every 10 minutes, or cause letters to disappear off the screen.  In 1995, I was running a WAN, I had servers spread across three states, primary and backup servers for each state located in every other state,  It was a monstrosity to maintain.  Nothing was wired, we used antennas on every building that had to be tuned frequently because the data was encrypted and if the antenna became out of tune the system couldn't decrypt the transmissions.  We thought it was great though because it gave us a sense of security, that our data could not be intercepted.  The WAN connections were over encrypted phone lines provided by GTE and leased by the government.  It was slow and time consuming when the primary server had to sync with the backup server daily.  And with all the advancements since then the only secure computer is still the same as it was in 1967, a standalone computer locked in a restricted access area, with no modem, network, or internet connection, no external drives or devices connected to nor any means of transferring any data from an external source to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


3 hours ago, straycat19 said:

 

That is not a fact, except maybe in your mind.  We require Firefox and Chrome on all the systems and do not use IE, to which there are no links so users can't use it.   Some of our web based programs work best with Firefox, some with Chrome. And nationwide that is probably about 1.5 million computers.  Plus I know many large corporations and most universities use firefox either as their primary browser or as their second preferred browser.  The problem with security is it is a broad field, and in the last 49 years I have worked in all of it and all aspects of it.  There are no experts in computer security, there are a lot of very knowledgeable people, but the field is too broad to have an expert in other than select specialized areas.  Those of us that started working with computers back in the 60s only had to contend with access to the immediate area as far as security went.  It started to become much broader with the addition of the modem, and then networks, and lastly the internet.  Then in the mid to late 80s we started seeing 'viruses', things that infected our computers and did crazy things.  They would fill your drive up with junk so there was no space left, or they would flip you computer screen upside down every 10 minutes, or cause letters to disappear off the screen.  In 1995, I was running a WAN, I had servers spread across three states, primary and backup servers for each state located in every other state,  It was a monstrosity to maintain.  Nothing was wired, we used antennas on every building that had to be tuned frequently because the data was encrypted and if the antenna became out of tune the system couldn't decrypt the transmissions.  We thought it was great though because it gave us a sense of security, that our data could not be intercepted.  The WAN connections were over encrypted phone lines provided by GTE and leased by the government.  It was slow and time consuming when the primary server had to sync with the backup server daily.  And with all the advancements since then the only secure computer is still the same as it was in 1967, a standalone computer locked in a restricted access area, with no modem, network, or internet connection, no external drives or devices connected to nor any means of transferring any data from an external source to it.

I know for a fact  that many jobs use IE  good rant though

 

 

Why do government offices still use Internet explorer considering my information could be jeopardized?


 

Quote

There are several mutual reasons: as IE is easy to lock down and deploy it is a logical choice for large desktop systems, and as such, applications used to get designed for it. Many organisations froze on IE6 for some time because of the cost of redevelopment and by extension were stuck on Windows XP as well. It was Microsoft that ultimately provided the tools to get businesses off IE6 and XP, but even then had to extend support for much longer than they wanted. However, corporate IT can be glacially slow and a new desktop build is a major task and many organisations still left it for a lot longer than they should. Microsoft finally got the message with Windows 10, hence the announcement that it was the last version of Windows and in future change will be rolling, in order in part to prevent another XP/IE6 headache for them and for big IT operations.

Quote

 

Most use Internet Explorer because it can be easily configured / restricted / administered  remotely through group policies on Windows machines that are a part of a domain. For other browsers that's not so easy ( if at all possible ).

So IE is sysadmins' choice.

 

Quote

 

 

Even the big IT companies like Accenture use only internet explorer and it is not recommended to use other browsers. Even remote login of many big giants like Citigroup can only be accessed by IE.
When I enquired then I was told that their websites are prepared with some security features and those  work only with IE and not with other browsers.

 

 

https://www.quora.com/Why-do-government-offices-still-use-Internet-explorer-considering-my-information-could-be-jeopardized

Why Do So Many Companies Still Use Internet Explorer?

http://www.lifehacker.com.au/2015/08/why-do-enterprises-still-use-internet-explorer/

One in four Windows PCs still running obsolete versions of Internet Explorer

http://www.zdnet.com/article/one-in-four-windows-pcs-still-running-obsolete-versions-of-internet-explorer/

i know  people who have too use a outdated  of version of IE and only windows 7 because they must use it too access a  certain site from the government . That's the most funny thing i heard all day, that work places use Firefox, because Firefox never been  ahead of IE in the market share yet. World wide or in the USA  and most people at home don't use IE  IE has been the biggest slowdown of technology growth since the XP days.

 

original-935372bdf878d117f11ac472cddb091

 

Fact Its all in you're mind that most use  IE are at home. Most use Chrome and IE at work on desktop  and on mobile  most use Chrome and Safari in the USA. if you add mobile more use Safari than IE and Firefox.in the US  Like always you say stuff without posting any proof . I should  of left  you on block  i don't have time for nonsense . lol. funny thing in the USA Chrome is on a downward slope  55 % in NOV a all time high 2016 too 51% in  Jan 2017  are people waking up? And Statcounter  is chrome friendly they reported  Chrome being ahead of IE long before Microsoft sponsored  NetMarketshare ever did,

 

 

Why don't you space what you say out some or keep it short? Most of you're  comments are all bunched  in one paragraph, even if its a half a page long and it triggers my dyslexia it gives me a headache just trying too read what you say lol..

Quote

 

Long blocks of unbroken paragraphs

Long blocks of unbroken paragraph text are not only hard for dyslexic users to read, but for non-dyslexic users too. It’s easy for dyslexic readers to lose their place with long paragraphs [1].

 

 

That’s why it’s better to use short paragraphs that express one idea [2].  This is because dyslexic users need more breaks between ideas than non-dyslexic users [6]. Breaking up your text to one idea per paragraph makes reading a lot easier for both dyslexic and non-dyslexic users.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, steven36 said:

Why don't you space what you say out some or keep it short? Most of you're  comments are all bunched  in one paragraph,  even if its a half a page long and it triggers my dyslexia it gives me a headache just trying too read what you say lol...

That's pretty bold comment coming out from someone who can't differentiate between your, you're, their, they're and there. lol

Just saying...

 

I didn't say that i disagree with your presented data tho. In fact that represents what i see around me. Most of people i know prefer Chrome than any other browser except maybe few close friend of mine. That's because i kept telling them to use Firefox like me, and it eventually grew on them.

 

Can't comment about IE stats since i don't have enough sample to say anything about it. But your lifehacker article explain it with very logical reasons. So that's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


40 minutes ago, trufpal said:

That's pretty bold comment coming out from someone who can't differentiate between your, you're, their, they're and there. lol

Just saying...

 

I didn't say that i disagree with your presented data tho. In fact that represents what i see around me. Most of people i know prefer Chrome than any other browser except maybe few close friend of mine. That's because i kept telling them to use Firefox like me, and it eventually grew on them.

 

Can't comment about IE stats since i don't have enough sample to say anything about it. But your lifehacker article explain it with very logical reasons. So that's that.

I am dyslexic so I'm no grammar major and I make lots of mistakes , But  I try too space out what i say .. But I read very well so i overcame part of it unless someone triggers it..I  was reading at a collage  level in grade school  but bunching everything together to make a point  is hard for me too read  and he was commenting too me lol .

 

If he wants too talk too me that don't cut it, so i end up  ignoring them after they get on my nerves so long ,  But I don't care if he comments too others like that .

 

That's not being bold that is a known trigger for the dyslexic..6 Surprising Bad Practices That Hurt Dyslexic Users

http://uxmovement.com/content/6-surprising-bad-practices-that-hurt-dyslexic-users/
Quote

Web accessibility doesn’t only extend to color blind users, but dyslexic users too. Dyslexia is a learning disability that impairs a person’s fluency or accuracy in being able to read, write, and spell

So I can get windows 10 free still and it would not be a lie even. I use Linux as well and some distros that have funky fonts set it off too. :P

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...