Holmes Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Eset doesnt quarantine links it just blocks them and I would add any links that get blocked to website url exclusion list. I recommend you update to eset ess nine Im using esrt nodthirtytwo nine and I dont have to add url exclusions I checked to see if sites were excluded and there not and I can access nsane down (Im sorry its not the version that corrects that its the definition files). You should upgrade to version nine if there are no conflicts with any programs using eset ess version nine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 11 minutes ago, mona said: I copied and pasted BALTAGY's entries (added them to those proposed by Steven and IT W@ORKED !!!! Thanks a lot @BALTAGY He posted the same ones I did? any site you exclude you remove the http:// or https:// from the url. add a star then the url and another star it works every time. Go see if you can download a crack off the front page with out the 3rd url lol I cant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mona Posted November 29, 2016 Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 7 minutes ago, steven36 said: He posted the same ones I did? any site you exclude you remove the http:// or https:// from the url. add a star then the url and another star it works every time. Thanks for that clarification. But this time - in order to avoid any mistakes I copied and pasted your and BALTAGY's entries. My exclusion list looks like that now : https://i.imgur.com/N2YwdOg.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skunk1966 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 @mona you can download the complete user guide for ESS v8 here: https://download.eset.com/manuals/eset_ess_8_userguide_enu.pdf it's very detailed so start reading Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 1 minute ago, mona said: Thanks for that clarification. But this time - in order to avoid any mistakes I copied and pasted your and BALTAGY's entries. My exclusion list looks like that now : https://i.imgur.com/N2YwdOg.jpg Yes what it was for some reason the one with www didn't work for you i dont why it works fine here if i dont add www they never work for me lol but if you have trouble try too remove WWW it takes some experimenting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghazi Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 @mona Hope your problem is solved. You do not need the 4th and 5th url as they are already added. Also I would backup settings to xml file in case you have to install eset again and not to go through the same process again. I have given my ESET Antivirus settings file if you want to use for version 8. Also you can revert to default settings by using the blank settings if something went wrong. Just update antivirus, register and export settings and see how it works for you. I have moved to the eset endpoint antivirus as I want to use the newer features offered eset settings.xml Eset blank settings.xml Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mona Posted November 29, 2016 Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 30 minutes ago, BALTAGY said: @mona can you show a pic of links in the quarantine you talk about? i don't get it how you want to restore links not files from quarantine https://i.imgur.com/mMEmEqr.jpg Moreover - I've tried creating some NEW nsanedown links just o moment ago while nsanedown site is no longer blocked. Even that the links keep ending up in quarantine and there is no way to restore them sucessfuly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghazi Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 @mona Go to log files and see whether the links are in filtered websites or something else. Also read the manual as ESET is very strict in deleting cracks etc if not zipped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 4 minutes ago, mona said: https://i.imgur.com/mMEmEqr.jpg Moreover - I've tried creating some NEW nsanedown links just o moment ago while nsanedown site is no longer blocked. Even that the links keep ending up in quarantine and there is no way to restore them sucessfuly. That's because you got the links running threw other programs and it detects trough those programs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BALTAGY Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 15 minutes ago, mona said: https://i.imgur.com/mMEmEqr.jpg Moreover - I've tried creating some NEW nsanedown links just o moment ago while nsanedown site is no longer blocked. Even that the links keep ending up in quarantine and there is no way to restore them sucessfuly. Exclude the folder that contain these shortcuts then restore them, restoring them without exclude the folder first will make them get deleted again for sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mona Posted November 29, 2016 Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 2 minutes ago, steven36 said: That's because you got the links running threw other programs and it detects trough those programs I'm not sure what you mean, Steven. What other programs ? You mean browser, or what ? I use to create my internet links by dragging the address line from my browser to the desktop or any other folder. Once they are dropped in their destination - they are immediately moved to the ESET quarantine. Had never experienced anything like that with EAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 If you enable these boxes they are for pup and they cause a lot false positives if you use conman sense or another anti-malware its not needed I never enable these . PUP protection is were NOD32 has the most false positives its crap it's worse than it's web protection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mclaren85 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 48 minutes ago, mona said: I copied and pasted BALTAGY's entries (added them to those proposed by Steven and IT W@ORKED !!!! Thanks a lot @BALTAGY If you are using internet download manager you should also whitelist proxy.nsanedown.com. Btw, Mona how are you, I think you are away for sometime? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 1 minute ago, mona said: Steven. What other programs ? You mean browser, or what ? Q Translate and you're other Anti malware its picking up nsane trough those not you're browser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mona Posted November 29, 2016 Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 2 minutes ago, steven36 said: If you enable these boxes they are for pup and they cause a lot false positives if you use conman sense or another anti-malware its not needed I never enable these . PUP protection is were NOD32 has the most false positives its crap it's worse than it's web protection Again thanks for valuable info, Steven. Yes, indeed PUP detection was enabled upon installation. Hope I can uncheck this option now when ESS is already installed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 28 minutes ago, mona said: Again thanks for valuable info, Steven. Yes, indeed PUP detection was enabled upon installation. Hope I can uncheck this option now when ESS is already installed. Yes you can check them and uncheck them anytime you like. say if you download a installer and want to check it for PUP you can check those two boxes scan it and then uncheck them but it has loads of false positives with cracks hack/patch and keygen crap and it will prevent you from being able to download some cracks lol. I enabled it before it stooped downloads after i got it downloaded it didn't detect it i hate that lol. it If something has a real malware its going detect it without those boxes you can test it with real malware in a vm if you like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mona Posted November 29, 2016 Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 21 minutes ago, mclaren85 said: If you are using internet download manager you should also whitelist proxy.nsanedown.com. Btw, Mona how are you, I think you are away for sometime? That's right. proxy.nsanedown.com. has been whitelisted in both : ESS and in IDM. @mclaren85 Sorry for this huuuuuuge delay. I'll send you an email tomorrow. Promise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mona Posted November 29, 2016 Author Share Posted November 29, 2016 35 minutes ago, steven36 said: Yes you can check them and uncheck them anytime you like. say if you download a installer and want to check it for PUP you can check those two boxes scan it and then uncheck them but it has loads of false positives with cracks hack/patch and keygen crap and it will prevent you from being able to download some cracks lol. I enabled it before it stooped downloads after i got it downloaded it didn't detect it i hate that lol. it If something has a real malware its going detect it without those boxes you can test it with real malware in a vm if you like @steven36 could you please give me the path to the place where I can uncheck PUP detection in installed program ? Can't find it again ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 9 minutes ago, mona said: @steven36 could you please give me the path to the place where I can uncheck PUP detection in installed program ? Can't find it again ! Enter Advanced Setup , computer , Antivirus and Anti-spyware only uncheck the 1st 2 boxes leave the 3rd and 4th one checked . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I4rg£8all8ag Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 6 hours ago, Holmes said: I know Im using the trial now when thats over Ill fix eset again. I think eset made it so you dont have to exclude eset in version nine of its software. For your information mona the current stable version of eset is version nine ten is beta. Completely incorrect, v10.369 is latest (AV & SS) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeetPirate Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 Add these to your list of allowed urls: http://www.nsanedown.com/* http://proxy.nsanedown.com/* https://www.nsanedown.com/* https://proxy.nsanedown.com/* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudrax Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 I would suggest only the antivirus version of ESET which is ESET NOD32. This is lightweight. For firewall requirements use WFC. This is the combo I have been settled down to after trying a lot of things concerning security. The good thing about WFC is that it uses windows' own firewall and give user the right to control inbound and outbout connection with notifications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skunk1966 Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 4 hours ago, rudrax said: I would suggest only the antivirus version of ESET which is ESET NOD32. This is lightweight. For firewall requirements use WFC. This is the combo I have been settled down to after trying a lot of things concerning security. The good thing about WFC is that it uses windows' own firewall and give user the right to control inbound and outbout connection with notifications. I've been using ESS (and now EIS v10) since v2 with ESET firewall in interactive mode and I've always loved the way it works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven36 Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 10 hours ago, rudrax said: The good thing about WFC is that it uses windows' own firewall and give user the right to control inbound and outbout connection with notifications. I don't think it's really no better than ESS using WFC ,If you learn how to use Windows 10 Firewall Control , It can block things like TU if you use a serial were ESS or WFC can't also Windows 10 Firewall Control has network monitoring , Telemetry Block and other goodies other firewalls don't . So saying WFC is better than all others in my book is not true, as long as it serves you're needs is all that matters but that don't mean it will serve my needs. Keep in mind i used WFC a good while and i switched too Windows 10 Firewall Control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Javer Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 23 hours ago, steven36 said: Yes this happens once every 30 days you just tell it no there's 2 Ips you can block in you're firewall that will stop this, also it will remove trial key watermarks, popups, and make keys last a little longer. I've been searching the internet a long time for a fix to block/turn off the 30 day Eset Nag screen ...can you please let us know which 2 IP's to block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.