thunderpants Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 Someone has released an updated version of Explorer ++(explorer plus plus) .David Erceg hasn't released any updates for a long time so it's good to see someone else is trying to fix issues.I noticed it in the forum:https://explorerplusplus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1764Link for the new version:http://www.favotext.com/explorer++.html'>http://www.favotext.com/explorer++.htmlIt's the same guy who released a program called Favotexthttp://www.favotext.com/I haven't used Favotext before ,so don't know much about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thunderpants Posted November 6, 2015 Author Share Posted November 6, 2015 I don't think so ,not at the moment anyway.It seems to run ok on x64 win7 ,though there has been some bug reports in the forum .edit:The original version(1.3.1) by David Erceg has 64bit version :https://explorerplusplus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=935&sid=80bf1f8a48e33aae3a8c9cae311faf34link:http://www.explorerplusplus.com/software/explorer++_1.3.1_x64.zipIt's on Github too with a newer version:https://github.com/derceg/explorerplusplus/releasesThough v1.5 by favotext seems to be the newest for a long time.He's still working on it so hopefully we'll see a new release for x64 soon.I really like it ,it's a clean looking explorer.If it gets improvements i'd use it as my default explorer.=======================================================I've just been looking at another explorer called Tablacus Explorer.It has a load of addons you can install from the tools menu.I think it's made by a Japanese guy.It's on softpedia and githib. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thunderpants Posted February 14, 2016 Author Share Posted February 14, 2016 Someones released a new build from source : 32bit + 64bit versions: https://explorerplusplus.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1794 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.