humble3d Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 More warrantless searches & seizures 12-7822 FERNANDEZ V. CALIFORNIADECISION BELOW: 208 Cal.App.4th 100CERT. GRANTED 5/20/2013QUESTION PRESENTED:Proper interpretation of Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (2006), specifically whether a defendant must be personally present and objecting when police officers ask a co-tenant for consent to conduct a warrantless search or whether a defendant's previously-stated objection, while physically present, to a warrantless search is a continuing assertion of 4th Amendment http://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/12-07822qp.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.