Screenshots of Windows 10 desktop build 10036 leak, no sign of Spartan

[anuseems]

This month we've seen quite a few leaked images of new internal Windows 10 builds, and now we get a peek at build 10036, which unfortunately doesn't include the new Spartan web browser

From Neowin:

Its been almost two months since Microsofts last public release of a Windows 10 Technical Preview build. The Redmond giant is planning to step up the speed of the fast ring releases, but its engineers may have hit a roadblock with a nasty bug, so were not sure when well get to see a new official build.

This month weve seen numerous leaked pictures of newer builds, and today we get to look at build 10036, which was compiled just a week ago. As with build 10031, its important to note that this build is from the fbl_impressive branch of builds, which we know is destined for Insiders.

One of the most exciting things Insiders want to see in a newer build is Microsofts new Spartan web browser, but this build does not appear to have it. Compared to build 10031, theres not much new to look at, so its likely that most if not all of the changes are under the hood.

http://www.neowin.net/news/screenshots-of-windows-10-desktop-build-10036-leak-no-sign-of-spartan

[AlexCross]

Who in his right mind would call a browser Spartan :)).

[Cooperb]

Who in his right mind would call a browser Spartan :)).

The Spartans? :D

[dMog]

still gonna wait for the official release...this still beta and will have all the bugs and other stuff that can possibly make life hard for your computer

[GRiM]

Who in his right mind would call a browser Spartan :)).

Firstly it could just be a code name for early dev builds, secondly why not Spartan? Do you know what the word means?

[AlexCross]

Who in his right mind would call a browser Spartan :)).

Firstly it could just be a code name for early dev builds, secondly why not Spartan? Do you know what the word means?

Of course I know, but do you know why did we evolve so fast? We always tried to name things as what they are, that's why you say apartment building or whatever, because that's the best way to describe that thing. Internet explorer describes best what a browser is, and so on. What does the word Spartan has to do with "exploring the internet".

[Karlston]

We always tried to name things as what they are, that's why you say apartment building or whatever, because that's the best way to describe that thing. Internet explorer describes best what a browser is, and so on. What does the word Spartan has to do with "exploring the internet".

About as much as "Firefox" and "Chrome" does. :)

"Internet Explorer - The Sequel"?... Internet Explorer 2? ...

[Reefa]

Who in his right mind would call a browser Spartan :)).

Maybe a Greek God :P

[SPECTRUM]

Who in his right mind would call a browser Spartan :)).

its just a code name, the final build could be just IE12.

example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_codenames

[GRiM]

Who in his right mind would call a browser Spartan :)).

Firstly it could just be a code name for early dev builds, secondly why not Spartan? Do you know what the word means?

Of course I know, but do you know why did we evolve so fast? We always tried to name things as what they are, that's why you say apartment building or whatever, because that's the best way to describe that thing. Internet explorer describes best what a browser is, and so on. What does the word Spartan has to do with "exploring the internet".

Spartan is it's code name because the browser is a very lite brower it's "spartan".

Also wtf has naming convention go to do with evolution of software?? Software will evolve at any speed regardless of what it's called. It may help dummies or newbies to programs to have their hands held with names but it doesnt make software "evolve" any more quickly. Look at Firefox and Chrome, they are not named in a hand holding way and they have "evolved" ...MUCH... faster than IE could ever dream of doing.

Your logic is utter nonsense.

[AlexCross]

Who in his right mind would call a browser Spartan :)).

Firstly it could just be a code name for early dev builds, secondly why not Spartan? Do you know what the word means?

Of course I know, but do you know why did we evolve so fast? We always tried to name things as what they are, that's why you say apartment building or whatever, because that's the best way to describe that thing. Internet explorer describes best what a browser is, and so on. What does the word Spartan has to do with "exploring the internet".

Spartan is it's code name because the browser is a very lite brower it's "spartan".

Also wtf has naming convention go to do with evolution of software?? Software will evolve at any speed regardless of what it's called. It may help dummies or newbies to programs to have their hands held with names but it doesnt make software "evolve" any more quickly. Look at Firefox and Chrome, they are not named in a hand holding way and they have "evolved" ...MUCH... faster than IE could ever dream of doing.

Your logic is utter nonsense.

Who said anything about evolution of software?

I don't get your example with firefox or chrome, so if 2 guys are stupid, the 3rd need to take them as example?

[Yorel]

I hope they change folder design, its awful :unsure:

[GRiM]

Who in his right mind would call a browser Spartan :)).

Firstly it could just be a code name for early dev builds, secondly why not Spartan? Do you know what the word means?

Of course I know, but do you know why did we evolve so fast? We always tried to name things as what they are, that's why you say apartment building or whatever, because that's the best way to describe that thing. Internet explorer describes best what a browser is, and so on. What does the word Spartan has to do with "exploring the internet".

Spartan is it's code name because the browser is a very lite brower it's "spartan".

Also wtf has naming convention go to do with evolution of software?? Software will evolve at any speed regardless of what it's called. It may help dummies or newbies to programs to have their hands held with names but it doesnt make software "evolve" any more quickly. Look at Firefox and Chrome, they are not named in a hand holding way and they have "evolved" ...MUCH... faster than IE could ever dream of doing.

Your logic is utter nonsense.

Who said anything about evolution of software?

I don't get your example with firefox or chrome, so if 2 guys are stupid, the 3rd need to take them as example?

So what evolution are you talking about then that is relative to naming convention of a piece of software??

So you're saying that Chrome and Firefox are stupid? lol get real ffs. Nobody has used IE for about 10years other than n00bs. It's a piece of sh1t.

What you're saying in nonsensical, you're trying to assert that all software programs/companies etc should name their products so that they correspond to function? That is utterly retarded.

[AlexCross]

:)) I don't know if you're trying to be funny or illiterate.

I imagine a world designed by your logic. Apple fruit comes from Spartan tree, and not from an apple tree, You're not walking on a sidewalk , you're walking on a grayrainbow, and so on.

I said that we evolved as humans because the way we named all the surroundings made it facile for other to understand their meanings and contributed to the language evolution.

Imagine someone that never heard about browsers, internet or anything about technology. You explain to him what's the internet, and then you say: You can browse the internet with an internet explorer, or you can browse the internet with Spartan. Which one is more meaningful?

It's not about IE vs Chrome/Firefox/Opera and so on, or how many people use IE or other browsers.

Or let me put it in another way:

What would had happened if the engineers hadn't made their work user friendly? How easy is today to code in C++/Java or etc? Imagine doing that in binary form, just by understanding how the system react to different electrical signal.

[GRiM]

:)) I don't know if you're trying to be funny or illiterate.

I imagine a world designed by your logic. Apple fruit comes from Spartan tree, and not from an apple tree, You're not walking on a sidewalk , you're walking on a grayrainbow, and so on.

I said that we evolved as humans because the way we named all the surroundings made it facile for other to understand their meanings and contributed to the language evolution.

Imagine someone that never heard about browsers, internet or anything about technology. You explain to him what's the internet, and then you say: You can browse the internet with an internet explorer, or you can browse the internet with Spartan. Which one is more meaningful?

It's not about IE vs Chrome/Firefox/Opera and so on, or how many people use IE or other browsers.

Or let me put it in another way:

What would had happened if the engineers hadn't made their work user friendly? How easy is today to code in C++/Java or etc? Imagine doing that in binary form, just by understanding how the system react to different electrical signal.

I'm sorry but you're just an idiot. Maybe you want to live is such a childish/hand holding way but I and most other people do not.

[Ehsan]

Windows has always had "Internet Explorer" and can not name it something else,

If MS names IE as Spartan, then we call Windows as Doors instead :D

[GRiM]

Windows has always had "Internet Explorer" and can not name it something else,

If MS names IE as Spartan, then we call Windows as Doors instead :D

It's a codename or a different browser ffs, how hard is that to grasp?

[tipo]

:)) I don't know if you're trying to be funny or illiterate.

I imagine a world designed by your logic. Apple fruit comes from Spartan tree, and not from an apple tree, You're not walking on a sidewalk , you're walking on a grayrainbow, and so on.

I said that we evolved as humans because the way we named all the surroundings made it facile for other to understand their meanings and contributed to the language evolution.

Imagine someone that never heard about browsers, internet or anything about technology. You explain to him what's the internet, and then you say: You can browse the internet with an internet explorer, or you can browse the internet with Spartan. Which one is more meaningful?

It's not about IE vs Chrome/Firefox/Opera and so on, or how many people use IE or other browsers.

Or let me put it in another way:

What would had happened if the engineers hadn't made their work user friendly? How easy is today to code in C++/Java or etc? Imagine doing that in binary form, just by understanding how the system react to different electrical signal.

I'm sorry but you're just an idiot. Maybe you want to live is such a childish/hand holding way but I and most other people do not.

All interactions between community members (be it via posts, PM's or via the shoutbox) should be free from flaming, baiting, spam, profanities and illegal / obscene material, and as a result should be positive, polite and constructive.

GRiM, are you working for M$?

let`s cut the cr4p and be friends here. it`s a forum! anyone is free to speak their mind..

[GRiM]

:)) I don't know if you're trying to be funny or illiterate.

I imagine a world designed by your logic. Apple fruit comes from Spartan tree, and not from an apple tree, You're not walking on a sidewalk , you're walking on a grayrainbow, and so on.

I said that we evolved as humans because the way we named all the surroundings made it facile for other to understand their meanings and contributed to the language evolution.

Imagine someone that never heard about browsers, internet or anything about technology. You explain to him what's the internet, and then you say: You can browse the internet with an internet explorer, or you can browse the internet with Spartan. Which one is more meaningful?

It's not about IE vs Chrome/Firefox/Opera and so on, or how many people use IE or other browsers.

Or let me put it in another way:

What would had happened if the engineers hadn't made their work user friendly? How easy is today to code in C++/Java or etc? Imagine doing that in binary form, just by understanding how the system react to different electrical signal.

I'm sorry but you're just an idiot. Maybe you want to live is such a childish/hand holding way but I and most other people do not.

All interactions between community members (be it via posts, PM's or via the shoutbox) should be free from flaming, baiting, spam, profanities and illegal / obscene material, and as a result should be positive, polite and constructive.

GRiM, are you working for M$?

let`s cut the cr4p and be friends here. it`s a forum! anyone is free to speak their mind..

I'm not flaming, I'm speaking my mind/opinion.

..and no I dont speak for M$.

[dcs18]

One of the most exciting things Insiders want to see in a newer build is Microsofts new Spartan web browser, but this build does not appear to have it. Compared to build 10031, theres not much new to look at, so its likely that most if not all of the changes are under the hood.

That is because this build shipped with Internet Explorer 11.

[Joe13]

One of the most exciting things Insiders want to see in a newer build is Microsofts new Spartan web browser, but this build does not appear to have it. Compared to build 10031, theres not much new to look at, so its likely that most if not all of the changes are under the hood.

That is because this build shipped with Internet Explorer 11.

It is in build 10041, but hidden somewhere. :huh:

//www.nsaneforums.com/topic/242078-microsoft-project-spartan-in-windows-10-technical-preview-build-10014/?do=findComment&comment=909528

//www.nsaneforums.com/topic/242065-spartan-has-failed-the-peacekeeper-universal-browser-test/?do=findComment&comment=909437

[dcs18]

One of the most exciting things Insiders want to see in a newer build is Microsofts new Spartan web browser, but this build does not appear to have it. Compared to build 10031, theres not much new to look at, so its likely that most if not all of the changes are under the hood.

That is because this build shipped with Internet Explorer 11.

It is in build 10041, but hidden somewhere. :huh:

//www.nsaneforums.com/topic/242078-microsoft-project-spartan-in-windows-10-technical-preview-build-10014/?do=findComment&comment=909528

//www.nsaneforums.com/topic/242065-spartan-has-failed-the-peacekeeper-universal-browser-test/?do=findComment&comment=909437

I know - but here, the reference is to an older build . . . . . . . . . 10036.