Jump to content

jalaffa

Recommended Posts

Yes, confirmed. It works. And a nice story included too. Thanks.

Yes, the license is valid, and more importantly, it is legal -- offered by Mr. Roshal as his "gift" to "all the mankind."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 62
  • Views 15.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

why you guys still are using WinRAR.4.00_keygen-FFF.rar ? there is a new version WinRAR.v5.01_KEYGEN-FFF.zip that works with all new winrar versions.

http://distro.0777.ir/index.php?dir=FFF/2014/04-April/&file=WinRAR.v5.01_KEYGEN-FFF.zip

Maybe because it just works as it should :D

Just checked to see what version I have been using for years and found that I have version 3.8, and it still works :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I downloaded from sernty post and took the key out the rar and put the key in the latest version and the version before this and it works . Freeware dont require a key at all to be freeware they would be no need for a key to register the program . There's a difference than a gift a giveaway than freeware . Still once you repost it not the way is was giveaway its not legal no more . Legal for you to use but not legal for redistribute . Because its not freeware. Even a lot of freeware is not legal to redistribute on to other host you have read there toss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


it doesn't look legal to me, albeit more ethical than directly using FFF keygen

From WinRAR EULA:

The author and holder of the copyright of the software is Alexander L. Roshal.

The RAR compression algorithm is officially owned by his elder brother Alexander, because Eugene Roshal has "no time to concern himself with software development and copyright-related issues at the same time."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Strange program even though the Eugene Roshal is from Russia .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Roshal

Copyright laws are under German law

http://www.win-rar.com/gtb_priv.html?&L=0

http://www.win-rar.com/winrarlicense.html?&L=0

And still

Eugene Roshal (developer),
Alexander Roshal (distributor)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WinRAR

So i guess Eugene Roshal can give a key away if he wants but if you redistribute not legal

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Strange program even though the Eugene Roshal is from Russia .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Roshal

Copyright laws are under German law

http://www.win-rar.com/gtb_priv.html?&L=0

http://www.win-rar.com/winrarlicense.html?&L=0

Eugene Roshal (developer),

Alexander Roshal (distributor)

nsaneforums (free users) by God's Grace :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It is such a pity that the lovely key from Eugene cannot be branded with one's own name - but then, that would be asking for too much. :sun:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Strange program even though the Eugene Roshal is from Russia .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Roshal

Copyright laws are under German law

http://www.win-rar.com/gtb_priv.html?&L=0

http://www.win-rar.com/winrarlicense.html?&L=0

Steven, should I feel shamed, because I'm near to use the crack? :)

I dont care Ive used them before I dont own it .. I was not around these sites when Eugene Roshal giveaway this key I didn't know it tell few months ago. . I got a legal key on another computer here . Its worth buying one its a very good program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Still once you repost it not the way is was giveaway its not legal no more . Legal for you to use but not legal for redistribute . Because its not freeware. Even a lot of freeware is not legal to redistribute on to other host you have read there toss.

In most cases, that would be a correct assumption. Because in most cases, there is a clearly specified clause that strictly prohibit redistribution of the giveaway version and/or any portion of the giveaway package, and such prohibition is clearly stated in the EULA of that particular giveaway.

But in this WinRAR giveaway, such prohibition does not exist. The source of the giveaway version which contains the giveaway license, and the essay authored by Eugene Roshal does not state "do not redistribute this version and/or any portion of this package" or anything similar. It only states:

In the year 2011 I decided to give all the mankind a gift: simple yet powerful easy to use tool for packing digital data and transfering through computer networks with ease.

I do not want to waste your time any more - grab the soft and use it with pleasure ;)
So without such clear and specific clause that prohibits redistribution of the giveaway package and/or any portion thereof, it is going to be tough for them to prove that it is illegal. B)

In addition, even if the EULA of other WinRAR's installer contains such prohibition, it does not apply to the particular giveaway version because the giveaway version does not include an installer in which the user has to agree to the EULA. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Still once you repost it not the way is was giveaway its not legal no more . Legal for you to use but not legal for redistribute . Because its not freeware. Even a lot of freeware is not legal to redistribute on to other host you have read there toss.

In most cases, that would be a correct assumption. Because in most cases, there is a clearly specified clause that strictly prohibit redistribution of the giveaway version and/or any portion of the giveaway package, and such prohibition is clearly stated in the EULA of that particular giveaway.

But in this WinRAR giveaway, such prohibition does not exist. The source of the giveaway version which contains the giveaway license, and the essay authored by Eugene Roshal does not state "do not redistribute this version and/or any portion of this package" or anything similar. It only states:

In the year 2011 I decided to give all the mankind a gift: simple yet powerful easy to use tool for packing digital data and transfering through computer networks with ease.

I do not want to waste your time any more - grab the soft and use it with pleasure ;)
So without such clear and specific clause that prohibits redistribution of the giveaway package and/or any portion thereof, it is going to be tough for them to prove that it is illegal. B)

In addition, even if the EULA of other WinRAR's installer contains such prohibition, it does not apply to the particular giveaway version because the giveaway version does not include an installer in which the user has to agree to the EULA. :D

  1. The software's unlicensed trial version may not be distributed inside of any other software package without written permission. The software must remain in the original unmodified installation file for download without any barrier and conditions to the user such as collecting fees for the download or making the download conditional on the user giving his contact data.

  2. The unmodified installation file of WinRAR must be provided pure and unpaired. Any bundling is interdicted. In particular the use of any install or download software which is providing any kind of download bundles is prohibited unless granted by win.rar GmbH in written form.

  3. Hacks/cracks, keys or key generators may not be included, pointed to or referred to by the distributor of the trial version.
  4. In case of violation of the precedent conditions the allowance lapses immediately and automatically.

10. You may not use, copy, emulate, clone, rent, lease, sell, modify, decompile, disassemble, otherwise reverse engineer, or transfer the licensed software, or any subset of the licensed software, except as provided for in this agreement. Any such unauthorized use shall result in immediate and automatic termination of this license and may result in criminal and/or civil prosecution.

Neither RAR binary code, WinRAR binary code, UnRAR source or UnRAR binary code may be used or reverse engineered to re-create the RAR compression algorithm, which is proprietary, without written permission.

The software may be using components developed and/or copyrighted by third parties. Please read "Acknowledgments" help file topic for WinRAR or acknow.txt text file for other RAR versions for details.

source http://www.win-rar.com/winrarlicense.html?&L=0

They have to grant you the right to redistribute in writing for to be legal :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


They have to grant you the right to redistribute in writing for to be legal :)

Yes, that is the standard WinRAR EULA. However, that EULA does apply to the giveaway version because the giveaway version does not come with an installer that forces that user to see and to agree to that EULA. The giveaway version is a simple rar archive, that the users only needs to extract the contents. The users of the giveaway version were not forced to see and agree (by clicking the "Agree" button) to that EULA when they used the giveaway version. So they cannot blame us for using/redistributing the license key that comes with the giveaway version.

Besides, Eugene Roshal himself violated this portion of that EULA

  • Hacks/cracks, keys or key generators may not be included, pointed to or referred to by the distributor of the trial version.

:lol:

Im just curious, is there bad blood between Alexander and Eugene? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites


:lol:

Im just curious, is there bad blood between Alexander and Eugene? :D

If Invented something and my bother owned the right to it id be mad too . That's like there's many singers that wrote songs but cant sing there own songs they wrote because someone else owns the rights to it. Eugene dont have to follow German law no way he lives in Russia .

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If Invented something and my bother owned the right to it id be mad too . That's like there's many singers that wrote songs but cant sing there own songs they wrote because someone else owns the rights to it. Eugene dont have to follow German law no way he lives in Russia .

Hahaha!! Good point! :D That probably explains Eugene's actions.

One more note, in addition to Eugene's own violation of the standard EULA by including the license key, he also violated the license limit by allowing "all the mankind" to use a "Single User License" of WinRAR. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If Invented something and my bother owned the right to it id be mad too . That's like there's many singers that wrote songs but cant sing there own songs they wrote because someone else owns the rights to it. Eugene dont have to follow German law no way he lives in Russia .

Hahaha!! Good point! :D That probably explains Eugene's actions.

One more note, in addition to Eugene's own violation of the standard EULA by including the license key, he also violated the license limit by allowing "all the mankind" to use a "Single User License" of WinRAR. :lol:

As far I know there is no way for them to check to see if using trial version , legal key version , Not legal version . The app dont even call home ..And they sold so many keys before it got keygened I doubt they ever would be able to change lic scheme because those are lifetime keys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You guys do realize that nsane is a crack site (albeit a very nice and wonderful crack site), that being said...who the fcuk cares if it is legal or not. Noone in this forum should! If you are worried about pirated materials then nsane isnt the place for ya!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You guys do realize that nsane is a crack site (albeit a very nice and wonderful crack site), that being said...who the fcuk cares if it is legal or not. Noone in this forum should! If you are worried about pirated materials then nsane isnt the place for ya!

locoJoe,

I was thinking how to say it better than you, but I can't. Bravo! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You guys do realize that nsane is a crack site (albeit a very nice and wonderful crack site), that being said...who the fcuk cares if it is legal or not. Noone in this forum should! If you are worried about pirated materials then nsane isnt the place for ya!

Hahahaha!!! I don't really care. Legal or not, I still love WinRAR. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I dont care how you use it .. But this is not just a crack site they post news here even if there was no crack out for winrar the update would be posted anyways and you would be happy to get anything that worked . I really find it crazy though everyone still post all kinds of old cracks for a program that's needed not cracked since 2009 . There's even a fix on the front page that works. If the only reason I came here was for cracks there would be no need for me to sign in .

The thing is most of the time there's a bunch of cracks and most of you are afraid to use them so they post serial or a dirty exe with no credits disrespecting the real crackers If your afraid of cracks you should not use them.you should buy your programs or stay in the giveaway section :lol:

No wonder people like TrapZero and SeveN from FFF and most all of the members that were in Team resurrection hardly crack anymore . Even if you do crack something it gets ripped or defaced . When I posted warez I gave credits always when I knew the source .

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...