Jump to content

AX64 Time Machine 2.0.0.439


jalaffa

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Views 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

V1 is v1, it naturally progresses to v2. V2 has new features yes, but it also fixes a thousands of bugs (big and small) that exist in v1. Yes there are new bugs that come with new features, but these will be ironed out in subsequent releases.

We do plan to release an official build of v2 that can be activated with a 'v1 key'. This would disable features such as multi-partition imaging, but would allow v1 users to continue to enjoy the fixes.

Source: Post #8939

Link to comment
Share on other sites


AX64 Time.Machine v2 Keygen ONLY by EAT

http://www.datafilehost.com/d/5b8ca115

AX64 Time Machine v2.0.0.439 Installer + Keygen-EAT

http://www.firedrive.com/file/9D3B2621CB31F87D

Tested and working

Time_Machine.png

Note:
Always remember to block applications (or go off line) from calling home 'during install'. Once installed, disable 'check for automatic
updates' option if available, so that you don't get it blacklisted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Post 15 by @Shadowx --» Keymaker ( done by Nemo - SnD Team) ---» Works !

Post 28 by @ARMOUR --» KeyGen ( done by EAT) ---» Works !

Post 2 by @Jofre --» Trial Reset ( done by Jofre)--» Works !

Frontpage still shows a keyGen outdated ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


AX64 Time.Machine v2 Keygen ONLY by EAT

http://www.datafilehost.com/d/5b8ca115

Thank you for sharing the information about this keygen! :) I am just wondering - if somebody here would know for sure: does this medicine work on 64 bit Windows? Is it meant for it as well?

I know that the previous keygen by group EAT (for version 1.x) did work on both x86 and x64 (I've used it). For the current version 2 of AX64 I’ve already registered the program via the keymaker-SND, so I’d better don’t mess it to test the one by EAT.

The reason I am asking is because in the .NFO file to the keygen-EAT you’d read:

"REQUIREMENTS .: WinXP/Vista/Win7/Win8 (x86 workstation)”.

That’s why I am a bit puzzled…
Thanks for sharing any experience, knowledge! :)

**

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ah, OK, of course, those are the system requirements of the software (AX64 TM),….sleepy me:)
But then - maybe team EAT simply got it wrong citing them this way (?);... still can’t see the reason for the "(x86 workstation)” …Anyhow :)
**
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...