Jump to content

AV-Comparatives Heuristic / Behaviour Test (July 2014)


212eta

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 22
  • Views 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bruinator

    4

  • Gabben

    3

  • Ashish

    2

  • player

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

After reading above AV report in PDF this AV test can said as quite Independent category

as usual BD number one..followed Kaspersky Then ESET number three

avt1.png

avt1a.png

avt2.png

avt3.png

Edited by iih1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Avast too pulled out from the tests?

Also the difference between no 3 (eset) and no 2 (kaspersky) is far too great.

2. 97% (kaspersky) compromised 29

3. 90% (eset) compromised 122

Eset has really fallen down from the previous test.

is it really down enough to warrant a switch over to bitdefender or kaspersky?

Edited by Ashish
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Avast too pulled out from the tests?

Also the difference between no 3 (eset) and no 2 (kaspersky) is far too great.

2. 97% (kaspersky) compromised 29

3. 90% (eset) compromised 122

Eset has really fallen down from the previous test.

is it really down enough to warrant a switch over to bitdefender or kaspersky?

Just install Malwarebytes Pro and you are good to go. No need to switch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


xtmpigt27z.gif

that is not how it works!

IMO, be sure to read the report, as they could be abused for advertisement

eg. i remember some article featuring Qihoo 360 XP Shield (eg. here)

but checking the AV-C report (this one, in chinese, ha)

revealed that 360 had configured their product to use Sandbox technology (while others had not)

Edited by player
Link to comment
Share on other sites


this test (july 2014) is not relevant because there misses many other AV and many free AV too. are they afraid of loosing of monopoly perhaps? it smells dirty business with this test and can not be trusted in my opinion.

Edited by go0gle
Link to comment
Share on other sites


this test (july 2014) is not relevant because there misses many other AV and many free AV too. are they afraid of loosing of monopoly perhaps? it smells dirty business with this test and can not be trusted in my opinion.

it can be trusted

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you're keeping your AV's virus definitions updated, then this test isn't for you.

Who doesn't update their AV's anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Kaspersky is the best so far, it will protect you quite good.

Yup ...u r ryt...

BD is neither less as it's protection is gud...but it really sucks

It eats up ur system like hell

I'm sensing another Norton [emoji12]

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Avast too pulled out from the tests?

Also the difference between no 3 (eset) and no 2 (kaspersky) is far too great.

2. 97% (kaspersky) compromised 29

3. 90% (eset) compromised 122

Eset has really fallen down from the previous test.

is it really down enough to warrant a switch over to bitdefender or kaspersky?

Just install Malwarebytes Pro and you are good to go. No need to switch.

true. that's one the best/lethal combo against malware/viruses

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you're keeping your AV's virus definitions updated, then this test isn't for you.

Who doesn't update their AV's anyway?

Well this test is made to test AVs' behaviours when they meet unknown malwares, which is only possible to simulate with outdated definitions, so it's actually relevant regardless of your up to date AV.

Edited by Nastrahl
Link to comment
Share on other sites


If you're keeping your AV's virus definitions updated, then this test isn't for you.

Who doesn't update their AV's anyway?

for ppl in the trenches actively trying releases visiting risky sites, behavior test is essential

how many of us could resist new release?

i recently got infected by a rogue download, and the next day when i retried the download (out of curiosity), AV blocked it at last, but not at first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Kaspersky is the best so far, it will protect you quite good.

Yup ...u r ryt...

BD is neither less as it's protection is gud...but it really sucks

It eats up ur system like hell

I'm sensing another Norton [emoji12]

From what I have read, 2015 uses much less resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...