"Compilation Of Tutorials, Guides, Tips & Updates"

[steven36]

I'm still trying figure out how blocking ips would work with kaspersky ? If it did it would mean any one that had version 2014 or lower could just activate it as trial and block whole program with a firewall and your key would never expire by installing offline update or using in a computer without internet . I don't foresee it working for a company that has there own offline updater for years .

But you take ESET it can be rigged by applying a registry patch and using Unofficial ESET Offline updater . But Kaspersky has there own Offline updater . It seems that if blocking internet had anything to do with it they would of never made and offline updater. I'm always skeptic about programs that don't have lifetime keys not expiring. There's many programs that don't require internet all and after it expires ether you have to buy it or crack it .

ESET I can see it maybe working but for but Kaspersky I don't , the Russians have been trying to crack it for years and the best they have ATM is trial reset . They succeeded a few times at cracking it but on the next build update it stopped working . Don't you think if blocking it with a firewall would worked the Russians would done figured it out along time ago?

See if u want ur trial status back we can use a trial reset

But

Here the main aim is to run a blacklisted 1095days wvu promo key for 3 yrs without getting it blocked

Kaspersky verifies keys at every update u do...but if u block those ips

Then u might have a chance to skip license verification so..that it will be activated

U cannot decrease or increase the count of activation and remaining days

As Kaspersky designed it that way

Soo ya eset is much easier to fool

Me having a legit key I can tell you this much about kaspersky if you leave your computer off for a few days Kaspersky will make you validate your key again .

Even if you could get it to work , It would be to easy for kaspersky to make a new build were your key will expire without internet . If you open one door with kaspersky they close 2 .

All they have to do is check the key with ips you get updates with . You cant block part of IPS to something and leave part of them working. Sooner or latter the developer will start checking through liveupdates . As many programs already do.

With 1095days keys all kaspersky does to blacklist it is send blacklist out in a update and kill it . Kaspersky has a whitelist and a blacklist and they can blacklist keys very fast now, for some years they had this and its very effective.

[dcs18]

Just only firewall blocking is enough or network too??

Pls tell me how to do it in network

just block it from configure packet data rules options also, this is extra measure only :P

what's the result on your system ?

I'm doing a simple reboot test so far...

Till now not an issue

Also...I'll give my feeds to u

Thanks and regards

Good to see you guys treading where even the mighty Russians are supposed to have failed - most folks (like our Russian counterparts) probably failed simply because they chose to be Pessimistic (it is all in the mind.)

My fundamental principle is loud & clear:--

When I think I can - I certainly will

If I think I cannot - I definitely won't.

Now having said all of that, a sound technique is also important - speaking of technique, here is a little heads-up:--

It is advisable to remove all instances of the Publisher's name from the trusted menu of your firewall with regard to the program that is targeted, to be blocked - for example, if auditing IDM, delete the Tonec entry from the Trusted Publishers (some firewalls might refer to Trusted Publishers, with some other name.)

This is just another layer of precaution - not mandatory (every bit of extra layer helps, though.)

[steven36]

Th

Just only firewall blocking is enough or network too??

Pls tell me how to do it in network

just block it from configure packet data rules options also, this is extra measure only :P

what's the result on your system ?

I'm doing a simple reboot test so far...

Till now not an issue

Also...I'll give my feeds to u

Thanks and regards

Good to see you guys treading where even the mighty Russians are supposed to have failed - most folks (like our Russian counterparts) probably failed simply because they chose to be Pessimistic (it is all in the mind.)

My fundamental principle is loud & clear:--

When I think I can - I certainly will

If I think I cannot - I definitely won't.

Now having said all of that, a sound technique is also important - speaking of technique, here is a little heads-up:--

It is advisable to remove all instances of the Publisher's name from the trusted menu of your firewall with regard to the program that is targeted, to be blocked - for example, if auditing IDM, delete the Tonec entry from the Trusted Publishers (some firewalls might refer to Trusted Publishers, with some other name.)

This is just another layer of precaution - not mandatory (every bit of extra layer helps, though.)

Leave the IP out for checking for IPS for updates for Tonec in your firewall rules see how long it works . Tonec has 2 things going for it that kaspersky don't ..Tonec don't require updates so you can block live updates and you are fine . Also Tonec has lifetime keys that can be generated of any keygen . And Kaspersky if you use any public key that's more 90 days ends up blacklisting you trough updates.

[dcs18]

Leave the IP out for checking for IPS for updates for Tonec in your firewall rules see how long it works .

After writing a tutorial with excruciatingly minute details and then maintaining it with extended support - why would someone act contrary to their own recommendations?

Tonec has 2 things going for it that kaspersky don't ..Tonec don't require updates so you can block live updates and you are fine . Also Tonec has lifetime keys that can be generated of any keygen .

Thank you for all that free education - I am most indebted.

[steven36]

Leave the IP out for checking for IPS for updates for Tonec in your firewall rules see how long it works .

After writing a tutorial with excruciatingly minute details and then maintaining it with extended support - why would someone act contrary to their own recommendations?

Tonec has 2 things going for it that kaspersky don't ..Tonec don't require updates so you can block live updates and you are fine . Also Tonec has lifetime keys that can be generated of any keygen .

Thank you for all that free education - I am most indebted.

You think developers are dumb ? When and app like IDM witch is like the most cracked app on the internet can check your keys through updates . Once the snitches goes back to @Wizard at Kaspersky he would start checking through updates too . If there's anything to your theory that it can work by blocking IPS . Kaspersky has tons of snitches because they give free keys to beta testers over there.

[dcs18]

@ steven36

Will you stop arguing and try to help folks, instead of appearing to be such a SpoilSport - FYI, I personally think Developers are the most intelligent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and handsome folks, OK (hope that makes you feel great, now.)

Trust we can now expect some assistance by way of tips instead of all the pessimism that you keep spouting.

[steven36]

@ steven36

Will you stop arguing and try to help folks, instead of appearing to be such a SpoilSport - FYI, I personally think Developers are the most intelligent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and handsome folks, OK (hope that makes you feel great, now.)

Trust we can now expect some assistance by way of tips instead of all the pessimism that you keep spouting.

Im not arguing . Im just pointing pointing out the obvious Only help I can give you with Kaspersky is use trial reset like everyone else does its been a very effective tool . Every since Kaspersky started white-listing and blacklisting very fast.

[dcs18]

@ steven36

Will you stop arguing and try to help folks, instead of appearing to be such a SpoilSport - FYI, I personally think Developers are the most intelligent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . and handsome folks, OK (hope that makes you feel great, now.)

Trust we can now expect some assistance by way of tips instead of all the pessimism that you keep spouting.

Im not arguing . Im just pointing pointing out the obvious Only help I can give you with Kaspersky is use trial reset like everyone else does its been a very effective tool . Every since Kaspersky started white-listing and blacklisting very fast.

Folks start growing sick of people who visit them only with predictions of doomsday, all the while - without offering any positives (do you know why they lynched that venom-spewing CockSucker, Nostra Damus?) :fear:

And, for the sake of Christ - can you stop being so patronizing (it is a sincere request.) :beg:

[steven36]

LOL chill out, even Nostra Damus was wrong he said the world was going to end when the Mayan calendar did but he was wrong . I don't claim to have all the answers I never did . He claimed he did. If I knew something positive to say about blocking part of ips from a program and leaving half then unblocked I would . But I cant and be truthful about it . sooner are latter by leaving ips open your asking to be nuked.

The last time I was nuked was using proxcap . The key worked fine for along time and all the sudden it called out and blacklisted me . I had to restore my system to before i installed and block it with a firewall to use it. :)

[dcs18]

LOL chill out, even Nostra Damus was wrong he said the world was going to end when the Mayan calendar did but he was wrong . I don't claim to have all the answers I never did . He claimed he did. If I knew something positive to say about blocking part of ips from a program and leaving half then unblocked I would . But I cant and be truthful about it .

Nostra Damus was wrong - but, you are never wrong and hey let me put it in a different way only you are the one and only one who is always right.

sooner are latter by leaving ips open your asking to be nuked.

The last time I was nuked was using proxcap . The key worked fine for along time and all the sudden it called out and blacklisted me . I had to restore my system to before i installed and block it with a firewall to use it. :)

There you go, again - you see what I mean.

[Torres]

Just gonna say we can discuss all this in theory but how abt testing it practically in a system, you will have the result yourself.

All your apprehensions will be gone or so I hope.

FWIW, the IP lists mentioned in the topic covers the blacklist that you have been talking abt.

[steven36]

Well got to go , I don't care if im right or wrong really I don't even use Kaspersky anymore . I don't need to try achieve 10 minutes of fame from posting beta methods that's not time proven on a warez board . If your wrong you just make everyone not trust you

LOL I'm too old for that . I don't get paid to test reverse engineers work . I most likely turned down more offers from admins, warez teams etc . To be something another other that and elite than most will ever see and refused them. I done paid my dues in the warez scene.

[dcs18]

FWIW, the IP lists mentioned in the topic covers the blacklist that you have been talking abt.

For some strange reason, he is adamant that we remove those IPs:--

Leave the IP out for checking for IPS for updates for Tonec in your firewall rules see how long it works .

After writing a tutorial with excruciatingly minute details and then maintaining it with extended support - why would someone act contrary to their own recommendations?

[steven36]

FWIW, the IP lists mentioned in the topic covers the blacklist that you have been talking abt.

For some strange reason, he is adamant that we remove those IPs:--

Leave the IP out for checking for IPS for updates for Tonec in your firewall rules see how long it works .

After writing a tutorial with excruciatingly minute details and then maintaining it with extended support - why would someone act contrary to their own recommendations?

No I don't want you to remove them .. You can if you want I dont care I was just using that program as an example of what happens when you leave ips out.

[dcs18]

I can understand vanity, can forgive narcissism, too - but, this is something beyond me (anyways, thanks for the confession.) :tehe:

[steven36]

I can understand vanity, can forgive narcissism, too - but, this is something beyond me (anyways, thanks for the confession.) :tehe:

I don't understand how you all can tell the good people of nsane to block part of the ips to a program and you expect it to keep working . If i was a developer the 1st I would do is nuke you through updates . You method for kaspersky has to many holes in it. Its about the same as adding 3 ips from IDM in your firewall and expecting the rest to not call out and check your key.

[dcs18]

If i was a developer the 1st I would do is nuke you through updates .

Well, you are not the Developer of Kaspersky - not even a Developer, by any stretch of imagination (good but, let me answer this hypothetical question with rhetoric - don't take this personally, it is meant for the actual Developer, not for you.)

As a Developer of Kaspersky, what the fcuk were you doing, all this time?

You method for kaspersky has to many holes in it.

My method for Kaspersky - What??? Where??? When??? How???

[dcs18]

I don't understand how you all can tell the good people of nsane to block part of the ips to a program and you expect it to keep working .

What??? Where??? When??? How???

[steven36]

If i was a developer the 1st I would do is nuke you through updates .

Well, you are not the Developer of Kaspersky - not even a Developer, by any stretch of imagination (good but, let me answer this hypothetical question with rhetoric - don't take this personally, it is meant for the actual Developer, not for you.)

As a Developer of Kaspersky, what the fcuk were you doing, all this time?

That's the great thing about the internet you don't even know who I am or what I am I can play dumb if I want or I can play not dumb .

[dcs18]

You neglected to answer my questions:--

You method for kaspersky has to many holes in it.

My method for Kaspersky - What??? Where??? When??? How???

I don't understand how you all can tell the good people of nsane to block part of the ips to a program and you expect it to keep working .

What??? Where??? When??? How???

[Torres]

I don't need to try achieve 10 minutes of fame from posting beta methods that's not time proven on a warez board . If your wrong you just make everyone not trust you

.

virtual fame :think: joined this forum just to meet new ppl. These methods just came along. I did it for fun only.

I don't understand how you all can tell the good people of nsane to block part of the ips to a program and you expect it to keep working .

If i was a developer the 1st I would do is nuke you through updates . You method for kaspersky has to many holes in it. Its about the same as adding 3 ips from IDM in your firewall and expecting the rest to not call out and check your key.

yes as long as i have support of the members and motivation from members like u, i expect it to keep working :tooth:

Now that's what i m saying without trying the method he found loopholes in it, kudos :clap: :notworthy:

now hoping u will share the holes for others to fill :sneaky:

[steven36]

I don't need to try achieve 10 minutes of fame from posting beta methods that's not time proven on a warez board . If your wrong you just make everyone not trust you

.

virtual fame :think: joined this forum just to meet new ppl. These methods just came along. I did it for fun only.

I don't understand how you all can tell the good people of nsane to block part of the ips to a program and you expect it to keep working .

If i was a developer the 1st I would do is nuke you through updates . You method for kaspersky has to many holes in it. Its about the same as adding 3 ips from IDM in your firewall and expecting the rest to not call out and check your key.

yes as long as i have support of the members and motivation from members like u, i expect it to keep working :tooth:

Now that's what i m saying without trying the method he found loopholes in it, kudos :clap: :notworthy:

now hoping u will share the holes for others to fill :sneaky:

I would be more than happy to help you if I could but when it comes to thinks like live ips not being blocked . I cant . The thing is the program works fine without blocking anything and resetting your trial every 30 days . Its not like there's not something working . Id rather waste my time getting something working that's not a fix for .

[Torres]

I would be more than happy to help you

still eagerly waiting for you to share the loopholes.

but when it comes to things like live IPs not being blocked . I cant.

oh c'mon don't be a spoilsport.

The thing is the program works fine without blocking anything and resetting your trial every 30 days.

Can't there be two methods existing side by side and both working just fine :think:

Its not like there's not something working.

Nothing wrong with IP Block method one also :nono:

I'd rather waste my time getting something working that's not a fix for .

Hoping I would be alive to see your path-breaking discovery :yes:

[software182]

:snack:

[steven36]

Loopholes that's easy the fact that your updating with live ips . In the real scene its a nuke if you produce another fix of anything without proven the other to not working . There's a reason for this so the developers cant mess up all methods at once . Call me old fashion but why fix something not that's not broke and take a chance breaking it. Another thing I don't fell welcome in this topic . I really don't think you guys like me . You cant take a debate if someone says anything contrary to what you say you attack them . Were is your proof that this even works how long have you testing kaspersky ?