212eta Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 (edited) AV-Comparatives Real-World Protection Test (April 2014)PDF Edited May 16, 2014 by 212eta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 According to the results, Panda is the new kid on the block. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iznogoud Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Avast definitely losing ground. False positive test is especially bad for Avast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manju Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 it's becoming hard to chose between keep using my free 3 year Avast! IS license or switching to my free BitDefender AV key from my ISP....or BETA testing the new 2015 BETA, witch as a very long license BETA key :lol: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirri Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 Panda looks ON fire...from 99.7 to 100 with 0 FP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nastrahl Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 To be infected by one of the only 5%, you must have looked for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trance89 Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 im using panda cloud free 3.0 with mbam premium, it's very light on system resources and i had no false alarms until nowlately panda is listed in top 3 in av-comparatives tests so i recommend it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkSlayer Posted May 16, 2014 Share Posted May 16, 2014 BitDefender is good, but it is horrible when it comes to configuration. It does not give the user almost any choice, specially when the real time protection detects something...Kaspersky is as good as BitDefender and gives the user a lot more on configuration options... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirri Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 Panda looks ON fire...from 99.7 to 100 with 0 FP.anyone try panda lately? It useto be a pain in the a$$ and blocked everthing i likedyes, it was hard to restore FP cause cloud based. But no doubt,its lighter today when I installed in my mom PC. Version 3.0 look terrible and ugly metro UI. Overall, they improving detection and reducing FPs.Kudos for Panda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted May 17, 2014 Share Posted May 17, 2014 I know of at least, a couple of members, here who are pissed off with the top rated Bitdefender. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NightWalker Posted May 22, 2014 Share Posted May 22, 2014 I know of at least, a couple of members, here who are pissed off with the top rated Bitdefender. :DBitdefender has amazing detection in tests and its engine is really good, but the software itself is full of bugs and heavy ( + 1.4 gb in disk)Because of that I prefer Emisisoft Antimalware (BD engine + in house engine + Behavior Blocker), it is a much better Bitdefender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darko999 Posted May 23, 2014 Share Posted May 23, 2014 kaspersky and emsisoft still the best imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kantry123 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 Kaspersky tops both performance as well as protectionI've tried many av but still like it better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.