Orbit Downloader - and why not to use it...

[johndoe]

Orbital Decay: the dark side of a popular file downloading tool

BY ARYEH GORETSKY POSTED 21 AUG 2013 AT 11:59AM

[UPDATE: Popular file download site MajorGeeks has removed Orbit Downloader from their site. 2013-08-23 19:00 AG]

Introduction

Orbit Downloader by Innoshock is a popular file downloading add-on for web browsers, used not only to speed up the transfer of files over the Internet but also for its ability to download embedded videos from popular streaming video sites like YouTube.

Figure 1 – Orbit Downloader

Orbit Downloader has been around since at least 2006, and like many programs these days, is available for free. The developer, Innoshock, generates its revenue from bundled offers, such asOpenCandy, which is used to install third-party software as well as to display advertisements in order to generate revenue.

This type of advertising arrangement is normal behavior these days and one of the things that ESET’s researchers regularly look at when determining whether or not a program is to be classified as a Potentially Unwanted Application (PUA). While that process is likewise fairly routine for ESET’s researchers, it is one which requires careful examination because the reasons for which programs may be classified as a PUA vary on a case-by-case basis.

Criminals understand that computer users want to download files and streamed videos and have already begun to take advantage of the situation, as computer security researcher Graham Cluley noted in a post on his blog, “Is that YouTube Video Downloader browser plugin safe? Beware!“

What is unusual, though, is to see a popular utility containing additional code for performing Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, which is exactly what our threat researchers found during an otherwise routine examination of the Orbit Downloader software package. Given the age and the popularity of Orbit Downloader (it is listed as one of the top downloads in its category on several popular software web sites) this means that the program might be generating gigabits (or more) of network traffic, making it an effective tool for Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. ESET identifies versions of Orbit Downloader containing this attack code as Win32/DDoS.Orbiter.A.

Orbital Mechanics

Sometime between the release of version 4.1.1.14 (December 25, 2012) and version 4.1.1.15 (January 10, 2013), an additional component was added to orbitdm.exe, the main executable module for Orbit Downloader. Here is what it does:

1. When orbitdm.exe is run, it sends a HTTP GET request to Orbit Downloader’s server at.
2. The server responds with two URLs containing further information:
   1. The first URL, named “url“, currently responds with the URL which points to the location of a Win32 PE DLL file that is silently downloaded by the software. So far, ESET’s researchers have seen more than a dozen different versions of this DLL file.
   2. The second URL, named “param“, initially responded with an URL oflanguage
      Several days ago, this switched to
      language
      For both URLs, the language variable was set to ENU for English, SKY for Slovak and so forth.

The second URL, “param“, seems to generate a response via HTTP POST based on the language parameter sent to the server in Step 1. Most of the time the configuration files were not very interesting to look at, consisting of zero values such as:

[update]
begintime=00000000000000
endtime=00000000000000

We did, however, observe one interesting response that stood out:

[update]
url=http://www.kkk.com
exclude=
param=200

It is unclear to us why the Ku-Klux Clan’s web site was chosen, as no similar sites were seen during our monitoring. This may have simply been a test by the tool’s authors to verify it was working.

This screenshot from a packet capture shows the HTTP GET requests from Orbit Downloader as it downloads the configuration file used to target the attack and the DLL used to perform them:

Figure 2: example of HTTP GET requests

Examination of the Win32 PE DLL by ESET’s researchers reveals an exported function with the nameSendHTTP which performs two actions:

1. The first action is to download an obfuscated configuration file from containing a list of targets to attack.
2. The second action is to perform the attack against the targets listed in the configuration file.

Here is a screen shot showing one of the il.php configuration files:

Figure 3: example of il.php file

Once extracted, entries appear in the format of a URL, followed by an equal sign “=” and an IP address. Here are some entries from another il.php configuration file we examined:

bbs1.tanglongs.com/2DClient_main.swf=210.245.122.119

tanglongs.com/static/script/jquery-1.7.1.min.js=118.69.169.103

The first portion of an entry, the URL, is the target of the DoS attack. The source IPs are randomly generated. In some instances, we downloaded blank il.php configuration files. This may have meant there were no current targets.

Two types of attacks have been observed:

1. If WinPcap is present, specially crafted TCP SYN packets are sent to the targeted machines on port 80, with random source IP addresses. This kind of denial of service attack is known as a SYN flood. It should be noted that WinPcap is a legitimate third-party tool bundled with many programs and is otherwise unrelated to this attack.
2. If WinPcap is not present, TCP packets are sent containing an HTTP connection request on port 80 and UDP datagrams on port 53 to the targeted machines.

These attacks, while basic, are effective due to their throughput: On a test computer in our lab with a gigabit Ethernet port, HTTP connection requests were sent at a rate of about 140,000 packets per second, with falsified source addresses largely appearing to come from IP ranges allocated to Vietnam. These blocks of IP addresses were hardcoded into the DLL file downloaded from ido.ipl, different ranges may have been used in the past, though, and could change in future versions of the DLL file.

Orbit Eccentricity

As mentioned above, the configuration file downloaded from Orbit Downloader’s server is encrypted to avoid casual examination. The first step is that files are encoded in base64, an encoding scheme most often used to send binary files as file attachments. After decoding, the data is then XORed with a fixed 32-character string. That 32-character string is actually the MD5 hash of a 9-character password that is hardcoded into the DLL file. After this operation, each pair of consecutive bytes areXORed together to generate a single byte of plaintext.

While each download of the encrypted data from the server varies, the actual content, once converted to plaintext, has remained constant for considerably longer periods of time.

Historical Orbits

Looking through older versions of Orbit Downloader, it appears that the DoS functionality has been present for some time, if not actively used, in a program file named orbitnet.exe, and notorbitDM.exe like current version. Also, this older version downloaded its configuration file fromstatic.koramgame.com and not from the orbitdownloader.com domain. Curiously, the version of orbitnet.exe containing the DoS code (version 2.6.0.7) does not appear to be bundled with any of the installation packages released by Orbit Downloader, although an older version, 2.6.0.4, appears to be distributed with the current version of Orbit Downloader, version 4.1.1.18, released May 2, 2013.

Conclusion

While we are just as puzzled as everyone else as to why this popular file downloading utility now contains remotely-updating DDoS functionality, we are taking action to protect ESET’s users from it. Beginning with virus signature database 8604, versions of Orbit Downloader with DoS functionality are detected by ESET’s software as Win32/DDoS.Orbiter.A.

In the meantime, until Innoshock, the developer of Orbit Download explains this behavior and/or releases an updated version without this unwanted functionality, we recommend uninstalling this program and using a different file downloader.

The following are the MD5 hashes of files analyzed in this article:

036b2f895fa1d64a1f1821ce9f61a56b
1896b319f5f5b101c028066c659c354e
1ce53a55317ae1f7eaef65b6241c66c8
28c22bac5621f058deb67ea9d7249de9
33544b3c3de8113847f8a676bbdf2db6
3988b798439e7d2deb03bb265cb9277a
3cbe133243e78e15445ad70fd33fc667
44d9dbe00e0396dbbac0efb3631bd8a1
809d5a4af232f08f88d315b116e47828
9e898210781061805844cc90cb77d3bd
9ef50486265891aff5542c3581934ab3
aaeb12d4b2498fb271d50fb31f4e1d5d
bd80f4eec1246289d3d735d8d0c7a57e
c21c7845b4f9510f9f18e4da284a5af5
d3a2438ee876a8780dfee73b8d266118
d8595fcc4ccbd7a742455ed30b156d69
e16366ee9ae1086bc86a719eaeebeb7b
f76c4e8ebcc79aa16f4254ed219a2857
f99c2446ddaa5ee9ebaf2abbc70d4a94

I would like to thank my colleagues Daniel, David, Hugo, Jean-Ian, Peter and Pierre-Marc for their research and assistance with this article.

Aryeh Goretsky, MVP, ZCSE
Distinguished Researcher

Author Aryeh Goretsky, We Live Security

Source / Direct link to article

Edited August 23, 2013 by 7h3Pr3d47oR
Edit title.

[TuFaS]

Thanks 4 sharing!

[insanedown58]

This has been posted numerous times but more clarification about the information would be more than appreciated. :D

Though I don't use programs like these mainly because I am satisfied with my download speeds, I think its a real douchebag move by Innoshock to turn a what seemed to be very reputable service to a cracked up DDoSing machine.

[Mr Orus]

Thanks for sharing.

* Topic moved to Software News.

[MITHI PRASAD]

I was previously very long back using orbit downloader until they stopped updating firefox addon.

How is the browser integration now

[Ambrocious]

I'm just sad that this once good download manager did this...wtf.

[Siddharta]

It should be removed from the frontpage immediately! <_<

[Lite]

It should be removed from the frontpage immediately! <_<

Actually we haven't listed the downloads for this since July.

We are leaving the malware note for this for the short-term to help users be aware of this.

[debebee]

I've abandoned ODL in favor of FDM and IDM