jofre Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Well...Now that I had the 1st automatic update with Box_Fix 1.06A (installed on 19th.March), have to leave this one and test 2.01A..OK! No problem,going to download right now and install...Thanks, MASTER @BOX !...and the winner :P is... :king: ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 ...and the winner :w00t: is... :idea: ???The winner is, us :P We are lucky to have these guys :king: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
box Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Sigh, box, mara-, you two obviously are the masters, can you put your heads together and make one fix? :king:Because now I really can't see the difference between the fixes, lol.I'm going to update mara-'s fix on the frontpage in a minute, but I'm in doubt if I should add yours, I appreciate what you've done and I respect you, but I think it'll make it harder to choose for our novice frontpage visitors.I'll have to think about this :Pps what do you mean with 'Fix will self-recover'?I'll have to try yours before I start asking a lot of questions.The biggest different here is the Self-defense (file-protection) being enabled while using the scheduled reset. Thus far, you can only get FULL Self-defense at boot time reset and NO Self-defense at all for the reset in the Scheduler. The other different here is that I force ESET to add the eval servers in the registry and into the drop-down list. Self-recover - After installing you will get either [Eset Schedule Reset.exe] or [Eset Trial Reset.exe], depending on your selection. The Trial Reset is only for start up. The Schedule Reset is for start up and a scheduled reset. Both are one same file with different names. Change the Trial Reset to Schedule Reset, execute it, and you just add a scheduled reset to what was only a start up reset. Basically, the file is a self contained installer.I also included diagnostic check to see whether the schedule reset is working correctly with the Self-defense enabled. If not, it tells you how to correct it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 Sounds great, I have yet to test it, I'm busy atm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mara- Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Hm, I just tested new Box crack and self-defense does not work at all. Service and registry files are not protected. You can stop service without no problem and you can change any registry value in registry.Cheers :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 Hm, I just tested new Box crack and self-defense does not work at all. Service and registry files are not protected. You can stop service without no problem and you can change any registry value in registry.Cheers :king:Sounds like you'll have to look into it again box.It's good that you guys are 'competing' a bit, this will eventually lead to an even better fix, but please don't take any comments personally :P@mara-Your 1.5 fix should be up in a minute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mara- Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Hm, I just tested new Box crack and self-defense does not work at all. Service and registry files are not protected. You can stop service without no problem and you can change any registry value in registry.Cheers :king:Sounds like you'll have to look into it again box.It's good that you guys are 'competing' a bit, this will eventually lead to an even better fix, but please don't take any comments personally :P@mara-Your 1.5 fix should be up in a minute.I'm not taking here anything personally. It would be great if what he is trying to do possible, but if self-defense can be so easily bypassed why did the Eset made it at all.Cheers :w00t: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 My 'don't take anything personal' was aimed at box, because it might seem like you were criticizing his fix, whilst you were merely pointing it out :P :king: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
box Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 The reasons it took me a long time was because of the security features in VISTA in relation to Self-defense. I have encountered this before in BitDefender. The part that screwed me up was that Self-defense can not be switched on/off via the registry. For example, if you disabled the Self-defense via ESET, then enabled it in the registry, and restart your computer. ESET tells you that Self-defense is ENABLED but my test indicated that it wasn't so. Also, I ran the crack in four Vmachines using 4 OSs to work out the bugs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mara- Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 The reasons it took me a long time was because of the security features in VISTA in relation to Self-defense. I have encountered this before in BitDefender. The part that screwed me up was that Self-defense can not be switched on/off via the registry. For example, if you disabled the Self-defense via ESET, then enabled it in the registry, and restart your computer. ESET tells you that Self-defense is ENABLED but my test indicated that it wasn't so. Also, I ran the crack in four Vmachines using 4 OSs to work out the bugs.I don't understand now. Are you saying that your fix is working correctly? Because I did not enabled self-defense via registry. I used Eset to enable it, rebooted and I checked registry and self-defense does not had effect, nothing was protected. I tested in VmWare using Win XP SP3. And, self-defense can be enabled via registry in Vista, you can see in changes of my fix that I solved that problem.Cheers :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
box Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Hm, I just tested new Box crack and self-defense does not work at all. Service and registry files are not protected. You can stop service without no problem and you can change any registry value in registry.Cheers :king:Sounds like you'll have to look into it again box.It's good that you guys are 'competing' a bit, this will eventually lead to an even better fix, but please don't take any comments personally :P@mara-Your 1.5 fix should be up in a minute.I did say a scheduled reset with Self-defense (file protection) enabled. Try deleting any of ESET's files. This is a partial Self-defense vs Nothing.The reasons it took me a long time was because of the security features in VISTA in relation to Self-defense. I have encountered this before in BitDefender. The part that screwed me up was that Self-defense can not be switched on/off via the registry. For example, if you disabled the Self-defense via ESET, then enabled it in the registry, and restart your computer. ESET tells you that Self-defense is ENABLED but my test indicated that it wasn't so. Also, I ran the crack in four Vmachines using 4 OSs to work out the bugs.I don't understand now. Are you saying that your fix is working correctly? Because I did not enabled self-defense via registry. I used Eset to enable it, rebooted and I checked registry and self-defense does not had effect, nothing was protected. I tested in VmWare using Win XP SP3. And, self-defense can be enabled via registry in Vista, you can see in changes of my fix that I solved that problem.Cheers :w00t:Just the FILE Protection are protected when using my fix with the scheduler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mara- Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 The reasons it took me a long time was because of the security features in VISTA in relation to Self-defense. I have encountered this before in BitDefender. The part that screwed me up was that Self-defense can not be switched on/off via the registry. For example, if you disabled the Self-defense via ESET, then enabled it in the registry, and restart your computer. ESET tells you that Self-defense is ENABLED but my test indicated that it wasn't so. Also, I ran the crack in four Vmachines using 4 OSs to work out the bugs.I don't understand now. Are you saying that your fix is working correctly? Because I did not enabled self-defense via registry. I used Eset to enable it, rebooted and I checked registry and self-defense does not had effect, nothing was protected. I tested in VmWare using Win XP SP3. And, self-defense can be enabled via registry in Vista, you can see in changes of my fix that I solved that problem.Cheers :PJust the FILE Protection are protected when using my fix with the scheduler.Ah, OK, no offense now. You know that I respect your work and your cracks are great, but this self-defense in Eset is pointless with your fix, since ekrn.exe can be terminated and computer is left without protection from viruses.Cheers :king: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 Nah, it's not pointless, it's just not perfect, yet.I'll try your fix this evening box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilegalec Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 I didn't bother reading 30 pages, but I just wanted to confirm that marafix works on Windows 7 build 5057 x64 :PThank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
box Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 The reasons it took me a long time was because of the security features in VISTA in relation to Self-defense. I have encountered this before in BitDefender. The part that screwed me up was that Self-defense can not be switched on/off via the registry. For example, if you disabled the Self-defense via ESET, then enabled it in the registry, and restart your computer. ESET tells you that Self-defense is ENABLED but my test indicated that it wasn't so. Also, I ran the crack in four Vmachines using 4 OSs to work out the bugs.I don't understand now. Are you saying that your fix is working correctly? Because I did not enabled self-defense via registry. I used Eset to enable it, rebooted and I checked registry and self-defense does not had effect, nothing was protected. I tested in VmWare using Win XP SP3. And, self-defense can be enabled via registry in Vista, you can see in changes of my fix that I solved that problem.Cheers :PJust the FILE Protection are protected when using my fix with the scheduler.Ah, OK, no offense now. You know that I respect your work and your cracks are great, but this self-defense in Eset is pointless with your fix, since ekrn.exe can be terminated and computer is left without protection from viruses.Cheers :king:Yes, I know. It is just an option for those who need to run the scheduler just so ESET will stay 31/30 day always. Just like when I did Norton 2009. I asked myself, what's the different between having 15 days and 30 days and 90 days if they continuously reset. And lastly mara-, I will always consider you as my "teacher". I mean this with the highest respect.I am on skype now. I need to shower first though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mara- Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 The reasons it took me a long time was because of the security features in VISTA in relation to Self-defense. I have encountered this before in BitDefender. The part that screwed me up was that Self-defense can not be switched on/off via the registry. For example, if you disabled the Self-defense via ESET, then enabled it in the registry, and restart your computer. ESET tells you that Self-defense is ENABLED but my test indicated that it wasn't so. Also, I ran the crack in four Vmachines using 4 OSs to work out the bugs.I don't understand now. Are you saying that your fix is working correctly? Because I did not enabled self-defense via registry. I used Eset to enable it, rebooted and I checked registry and self-defense does not had effect, nothing was protected. I tested in VmWare using Win XP SP3. And, self-defense can be enabled via registry in Vista, you can see in changes of my fix that I solved that problem.Cheers :PJust the FILE Protection are protected when using my fix with the scheduler.Ah, OK, no offense now. You know that I respect your work and your cracks are great, but this self-defense in Eset is pointless with your fix, since ekrn.exe can be terminated and computer is left without protection from viruses.Cheers :king:Yes, I know. It is just an option for those who need to run the scheduler just so ESET will stay 31/30 day always. Just like when I did Norton 2009. I asked myself, what's the different between having 15 days and 30 days and 90 days if they continuously reset. And lastly mara-, I will always consider you as my "teacher". I mean this with the highest respect.I am on skype now. I need to shower first though.OK, I also respect you. I'm sure that you are better cracker then I, maybe I just know better to create applications for cracks :idea: If you have some ideas for full self-defense and to be able to do reset trial without reboot, PM me, so we can find some good solution.BTW, does anyone have problems with updating. Eset ask for username/password on trial :blink: I found something here, but it was long time ago. Maybe the same thing is happening again?Cheers :w00t: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 Doesn't ask for anything here...It just works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mara- Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 Hm, strange. I'll try to reinstall NOD. Do you have latest definitions updated?Cheers :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
box Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 OK, I also respect you. I'm sure that you are better cracker then I, maybe I just know better to create applications for cracks :king: If you have some ideas for full self-defense and to be able to do reset trial without reboot, PM me, so we can find some good solution.BTW, does anyone have problems with updating. Eset ask for username/password on trial :w00t: I found something here, but it was long time ago. Maybe the same thing is happening again?Cheers :PSame here with U/P on trial. We should conference. I think that I am now rehearsed with ESET. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 3953, the latest according to ESET's site :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mara- Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 OK, I also respect you. I'm sure that you are better cracker then I, maybe I just know better to create applications for cracks :w00t: If you have some ideas for full self-defense and to be able to do reset trial without reboot, PM me, so we can find some good solution.BTW, does anyone have problems with updating. Eset ask for username/password on trial :blink: I found something here, but it was long time ago. Maybe the same thing is happening again?Cheers :PSame here with U/P on trial. We should conference. I think that I am now rehearsed with ESET.I just managed to get latest definitions in VMWare with first update which converted my version to trial. I'll reinstall Eset on my main machine. I'll see what will happen with next update.Cheers :king:EDIT: I think I read somewhere that everybody who gain 500 posts will become VIP, if this is true, box should get one more VIP :idea: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mo Husen Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 We have a few "CRACK-KINGs" bloke on this Forumbut keeping up with these Eset options is driving me NSANE.I do not know which MEDICINE is the best CURE so I will just go out & for now.Keep up all your good work & just keep on CRACK-s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shought Posted March 21, 2009 Author Share Posted March 21, 2009 EDIT: I think I read somewhere that everybody who gain 500 posts will become VIP, if this is true, box should get one more VIP :DTrue, but some of us don't totally agree with this method of 'measuring' ViPworthyness ;) :PI've added one ViP to box's record ;) :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jofre Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 OK ! Finally could get 1st manual update from ESET Servers, that are overloaded again and all was very,very slow.ESS 4.0.314 and Box-Fix 2.01A - ( WinXP Pro SP3 - 32bits).No error found during installation. Was done Scheduled 2x day and Self-Defense is activated.Virus signature database = 3.953 (21th.March.2009).------------------------------------------------------------Also uploaded ==== All latest fixes done by Nsane`s Members and others (21th.March.2009) for ESET 3 and 4 =====with BOX_Fix 2.01A included = POST 571=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------All Fixes done by Nsane Members have full instructions about how to install.cheersJofre Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
box Posted March 21, 2009 Share Posted March 21, 2009 OK ! Finally could get 1st manual update from ESET Servers, that are overloaded again and all was very,very slow.ESS 4.0.314 and Box-Fix 2.01A - ( WinXP Pro SP3 - 32bits).No error found during installation. Was done Scheduled 2x day and Self-Defense is activated.Virus signature database = 3.953 (21th.March.2009).------------------------------------------------------------cheersJofreDamn it worked! The update I mean. ;) Night all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.