maia Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 Results here:http://www.av-comparatives.org/comparativesreviews/detection-testScreen of results by me: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 Symantec Users are not going to like this one. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted April 10, 2013 Administrator Share Posted April 10, 2013 Symantec. :lmao: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technology Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 Surprise to see Microsoft is doing well 92% not bad at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captcha Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 i heard symmantec now believes in dynamic protection :rtfaq: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs18 Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 I'm an ESET User and I accept the number 10 position with all my grace. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizarre™ Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 Take a look at M$ :tehe: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator DKT27 Posted April 10, 2013 Administrator Share Posted April 10, 2013 Surprise to see Microsoft is doing well 92% not bad at all.That's actually second worse. :POnly that it isn't included in the final awards list: 6Microsoft security products are no longer included in the awards page, as their out-of-box detection is included in the operating system and therefore out-of-competition. Take a look at M$ :tehe:First, it needs to detect anything for it to detect false positives. :lol:Nah, just joking. It's good in detecting / removing known / big / essential things, it's MSRT is also known to have no FPs, however, that's it, too much a basic protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Orus Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 :doh: ...back home! :pos: that figure :shit:...... :tooth: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technology Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 Surprise to see Microsoft is doing well 92% not bad at all.That's actually second worse. :POnly that it isn't included in the final awards list:I have seen the detection rate and the removal of MSE, it actually did quite good in W8.Emsisoft is a very good AV in detecting false positive including with negative Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshall39 Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 Kaspersky always in top 3... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesse Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 Emsisoft 38 fps? :o ... trendmicro have improved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marik Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 I wonder how much M$ paid to give them 0 fps in that test :troll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahinul Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 I belive that Kaspersky is the best; MS Security Essentials is very annoying since v3 but still it is somehow a good option as an av but not the best; I don't know what to say about Avira... I never was satisfied using it.G Data is a good av but you need a good machine to face the resources that it needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ande Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 Seems that installing Symantec will only reduce computer protection, but on the other hand you will get nice amount of false positives at no charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.