Windows Firewall Control 3.8.2.2 Keygen fixed

[xpmule]

Windows Firewall Control 3.8.2.2

http://www.nsanedown.com/?request=141472782

Link to kg only..

http://www.multiupload.nl/8JQ15BM7AJ

hope this is ok to post like this ;)

read the nfo for more info inside the .rar file.

note: this is not random web garbage i patched it and tested this myself

although i have no idea who made the keygen in the first place though.

i noticed a nasty bug with uTorrent and build 3.8.2.2 so i'm staying with 3.8.2.1.

it keeps giving notifications over and over on me with the current build but not the old one.

I'm new to this program and just tried it out a few days ago for the first time and its not bad :)

[PurplebeanZ]

I made the original - source code here: http://www.nsaneforums.com/topic/63411-interactive-tutorials-coders-vault/?p=519042

Not tested or examined your patch so I can't comment on that yet, but it's good to see people tinkering :)

[xpmule]

cool glad you didn't mind and i clicked that link but it said permission denied. (edit: PurpleBeanZ sent me the SRC)

i have experience with c/c++ and i figured that would have been a fairly quick build lol

i don't know how the algo works or anything but i just hex edited the value in the keygen

with the newer value found in more recent wfc.exe builds.

also if i registered with the keygen on the build it was designed for i can update and it stays registered when updating.

that has gotta be the most anonymous keygen i have seen lol (most people would have added their name on it)

some random guy posted it on TPB (where i seen it first) but he posted it with a newer wfc build

and the commenters were saying it didn't work and they were right so.. since i already tinkering.

edited: fixed some spelling etc

[anuraag]

Tested Working and frontpaged

[Shadowx]

Well, i tested it on my windows 7 x86 using installer 3.8.2.2 and seems works btw

[xpmule]

well i'm happy to see it will help.. sometimes people can be a bit paranoid..

for example i made a patched version of Razor1911's GTA 4 loader so the group logo and chip tunes would not

show up on every launch and someone kept taking my link down (thinking it must be a virus) (at TPB not at nsane))

it (the splash screen) would give me a heart attack almost because i always forgot it did that lol

So like that GTA patch i made and this patch i never try and hide what is done.. like i don't use packers / encryptors etc

so most of the time people can see clearly what i did by just hex comparing the old and new file.

If people want to post Anything i have uploaded Anywhere go ahead i don't care what people do.

edit: added note about my link issue at TPB not here (i should have made that more clear)

[Guest Random Dude]

i noticed a nasty bug with uTorrent and build 3.8.2.2 so i'm staying with 3.8.2.1.

it keeps giving notifications over and over on me with the current build but not the old one.

I'm new to this program and just tried it out a few days ago for the first time and its not bad :)

Is the error with utorrent the following:

"Error opening windows firewall 0x80070005 access denied"

If so, that has nothing to do with Windows Firewall Control (any version).

To fix that error:

1. Make sure the torrent port is open in the Windows Firewall

2. Open the utorrent client using "RUN AS ADMINISTRATOR"

[xpmule]

No but thanks..

The problem i have found is i get a prompt to allow it over and over and i say yes / always everytime and a new rules gets created every time.

I also have WFC setup to prompt on all outgoing attempts and have done a lot of uninstalling and restoring and resetting the rules etc

regardless of how i have the rules setup i have a problem like this on 3.8.2.2 but no problem on any older version.

I am using uTorrent v2.2.1 last build with a DHT patch i made (added to TPB long ago)

So i dunno maybe i'll see if its a problem on the next version.. maybe the dev screwed up the program ?

If you look at the changelog the guy made some major changes onthis last version.

Oh and what is weird is this is the only program that acted like that.

[xpmule]

I've done a LOT of testing and i like this program but

There is a problem with compatibility with Peerblock + uTorrent + WFC

v3.8.2.1 works fine.

v3.8.2.2 triggers a rule creation on every single block by PB. (when notifications are set to high in WFC)

if you say yes to permanently allow uTorrent it won't matter a rule will be added and you will get a prompt

on the next Peerblock IP address blocked.. again and again ..endlessly

No matter how many rules you create OR what kind this problem is unavoidable.

Not sure if this applies to uTorrent v2 only or also recent v3.xx versions also.

So i guess i'm gonna stay with v3.8.2.1 for now. It's either that or get rid of Peerblock and update WFC.

The developer obviously changed some stuff (noted in his changelog)

I would go and bug him/her about it but the feature i am using is only for paid users.

So i hope this info might help someone else or help me if someone has a work around for the problem i mentioned.

and i would like to know if uTorrent v3.xx + PB + WFC (prompts on HIGH) are a problem too ?

i have tried adding every combo of rules for Peerblock and uTorrent.. inbound and / or outbound etc..

[Guest BName]

Hey, can you please update the keygen for the new version 3.9.0.0?

Thanks

[anuraag]

Updated

[alexandrud]

It is sad that for the 10$ for a lifetime license, people still use keygens instead of supporting the developer.

[Ponting]

It is sad that for the 10$ for a lifetime license, people still use keygens instead of supporting the developer.

Are you the creator of WFC? :unsure:

See here for more

[0veR]

It is sad that for the 10$ for a lifetime license, people still use keygens instead of supporting the developer.

$10 is lots of money for a program that just modified Windows fireawall!

There is actual real firewalls apps and they are free and your app is not even firewall its just edit Windows firewall rules!

So yeah $10 to much...

[alexandrud]

I know there are free firewalls. If it is so simple to use a free firewall and my program is not even a firewall, why do you still want to use it ? It seems that you can't respect other's people work. Try to put yourself in my position, spending a lot of time with the development, paying for hosting a website, buying new hardware, etc, and 10$ is too much for a lifetime license ? Yes, for stingy people.

[Shadowx]

http://torrentz.eu/users/alexandrud < This

https://www.facebook.com/alexandru.dicu

Is this your account or someone else

[Marik]

Maybe it is and maybe it isn't, it doesn't prove anything as we all known everybody from high ranking CEO's in M$ or google to the CIA and FBI pirate stuff.

No, this is about the matter of his app, which he spent time to develop, being pirated.

You're like the 3rd software developer that's greeted us withing the past year with the hitmanpro guy being the first and the usb safely remove one being the second, and now, here you are...we must be getting popular XD

And saying people are stingy is erroneous as not everybody can actually pay those 10$ so some of us are forced to pirate it out of need not out of greed (those with money who are the real stingy ones) and the fact that we do is a testament of how popular your software is and we all know that piracy leads to popularity/advertising and that leads to profit.

Others don't have a CC so they can't pay via paypal so does that mean they should be striped form the right to acquire it, why don't you set up a western union method of payment as well?

As for the extra server costs and everything, I can't speak in your name but if I was a soft developer, I would've established myself on a forum, ask the admin to make a section for my app and operate from there and that way the money I'd be spending on hosting would go into my pocket.

[Guest alexandrud]

http://torrentz.eu/users/alexandrud < This

https://www.facebook.com/alexandru.dicu

Is this your account or someone else

There seems to be another person with my name. It is like searching for John Smith. There are a lot of John Smith in the world.

Maybe it is and maybe it isn't, it doesn't prove anything as we all known everybody from high ranking CEO's in M$ or google to the CIA and FBI pirate stuff.

No, this is about the matter of his app, which he spent time to develop, being pirated.

You're like the 3rd software developer that's greeted us withing the past year with the hitmanpro guy being the first and the usb safely remove one being the second, and now, here you are...we must be getting popular XD

And saying people are stingy is erroneous as not everybody can actually pay those 10$ so some of us are forced to pirate it out of need not out of greed (those with money who are the real stingy ones) and the fact that we do is a testament of how popular your software is and we all know that piracy leads to popularity/advertising and that leads to profit.

Others don't have a CC so they can't pay via paypal so does that mean they should be striped form the right to acquire it, why don't you set up a western union method of payment as well?

As for the extra server costs and everything, I can't speak in your name but if I was a soft developer, I would've established myself on a forum, ask the admin to make a section for my app and operate from there and that way the money I'd be spending on hosting would go into my pocket.

Well, is not like I try here to eradicate the piracy, because this is useless. But I was wondering why, even if the program costs less than 2 sodas when you go to a bar, there are still a lot of users which prefer to use a pirated copy.

Regarding the forum approach, this is not very professional.

[Marik]

The problem here lies in the payment option.

I've checked your site and the only payment option seems to be paypal.

I'm not a user of your app but it is a nice piece of software, I'll give you that.

Also, an example.

Say I wanna purchase your app. I go to your website, click on the donate button and I get redirected to pyapal.

But here's the problem, I don't have a CC so I can't make the purchase, so I go back and try to search for another payment method.

I don't find one and am left with two choices, I either give up entirely on the app OR I pirate it because I want it really bad and I end up doing just that.

That's why the introduction of another payment method is necessary, so people like me who aren't in the possession of a cc can pay for it instead of pirating it, since, as you said, it's less than two cola bottles.

As for the forum thing, is it professional...no

is it profitable...yes

[0veR]

I know there are free firewalls. If it is so simple to use a free firewall and my program is not even a firewall, why do you still want to use it ? It seems that you can't respect other's people work. Try to put yourself in my position, spending a lot of time with the development, paying for hosting a website, buying new hardware, etc, and 10$ is too much for a lifetime license ? Yes, for stingy people.

If you added better protection in your program so maybe people started buying instead pirating!

[DKT27]

Fundamentally, we want everyone to buy the software if they like it and can buy it. Hence, the last line in all the nfo files,

"If you like it and can afford it, please support the developers and buy it". :)

[alexandrud]

I know there are free firewalls. If it is so simple to use a free firewall and my program is not even a firewall, why do you still want to use it ? It seems that you can't respect other's people work. Try to put yourself in my position, spending a lot of time with the development, paying for hosting a website, buying new hardware, etc, and 10$ is too much for a lifetime license ? Yes, for stingy people.

If you added better protection in your program so maybe people started buying instead pirating!

The program was obfuscated in the past, but it is useless because you can deobfuscate all NET obfuscation algorythms with de4dot in seconds. This is a NET application. It is kinda hard to protect the code, and the code also contains the licensing schema, so I can't protect it. Even big names like Microsoft or Adobe are pirated. What makes you think that I can come with a protection scheme that will beat the crackers methods ? I can make the licensing system to check the license online, but again, in this case there will be someone that will reverse engineer the exe file, will remove the activation flag and will recompile it to avoid any online activation check. This is why I thought that 10 bucks will not be too much. Anyway, there will be always two kind of people: the ones that will pay for a product and the ones who will never pay, even if they have the money. :)

[Marik]

that last part is what we call pirating out of greed but there are some of us who do have the money but don't have a CC so we can't pay for it hence the western union suggestion

that's how I paid for my copy of garenahack :tehe:

[alexandrud]

To receive $10 in Romania with Western Union, a person from US must pay $20.99 :wtf: , so I guess WU is not a variant. PayPal is automated and the donation is received instantly. Also, the registration is done instantly. I guess, a credit card is needed for Internet payments. :doh:

[digimon]

To receive $10 in Romania with Western Union, a person from US must pay $20.99 :wtf: , so I guess WU is not a variant. PayPal is automated and the donation is received instantly. Also, the registration is done instantly. I guess, a credit card is needed for Internet payments. :doh:

well if its good software i buy it other software i dont but in this case i find no compelling reason to use this software even if it was free id still not use it now the usb flash drive controll id probably pay for long before the firewall app