Palemoon or Waterfox ? You decide...

[anakin206]

I'm a Firefox user but I have the portable version of Pale Moon when I need to use it in my job.

[Lucent]

nither mozilla , show me how u can use more than 2 giga using firefox ? i am using about 18 tabs and its barely scratch the 1 giga mem uses :)

I'll screenshot the Task Manager next time I'm using Waterfox on my main PC ;)

In that case , using waterfox 16 u may get high above 1 giga since there is a mem lick in that version, try firefox 17 and u will see the mem usage difference.

try FF 18 and it even reduced in my side anyway :)

And, here it's the screenshot: http://d.pr/i/aAj8 :D

It's Waterfox 13 on my home box, still stable and sound even if eating that much resources :)

[DKT27]

You should upgrade, it might be some memory leak in Firefox that might have fixed in newer version.

[demoneye]

You should upgrade, it might be some memory leak in Firefox that might have fixed in newer version.

i already told him that , maybe he skip my comment :)

In that case , using waterfox 16 u may get high above 1 giga since there is a mem lick in that version, try firefox 17 and u will see the mem usage difference

^^^ i already told him that , its almost sure mem lick ^^^

[DKT27]

Thing is, Waterfox 17 hasn't released. To confirm the memory leak fixture, he has to try Waterfox. Hence, try Waterfox 16 and see.

[Lucent]

Updated to the last version, let's see what happens :)