Obama’s Secret Directive Paves Way For Continued Military Cyber Offensive

[Ambrocious]

Administration has long been attacking other nations with malware viruses that are also infecting, compromising US infrastructure

Steve Watson

Infowars.com

Nov 15, 2012

Following yesterday’s defeat of the draconian cybersecurity legislation in the Senate, it was revealed that back in mid October, president Obama signed off on a secret directive that will enable the US military to use newly created computer viruses to attack any organisation or country deemed to be a cyber threat. The president has already proved the willingness to carry out such attacks, as new details surrounding the 2010 stuxnet attack revealed earlier this year.

The Washington Post cited several US officials speaking under anonymity in a report on the development last night.

“The new directive is the most extensive White House effort to date to wrestle with what constitutes an “offensive” and a “defensive” action in the rapidly evolving world of cyberwar and cyberterrorism.” the report states.

“What it does, really for the first time, is it explicitly talks about how we will use cyber-operations,” a senior administration official said. “Network defense is what you’re doing inside your own networks. . . Cyber-operations is stuff outside that space, and recognizing that you could be doing that for what might be called defensive purposes.”

“An example of a defensive cyber-operation that once would have been considered an offensive act, for instance, might include stopping a computer attack by severing the link between an overseas server and a targeted domestic computer.” the report continues.

Essentially, in the same way the Bush administration employed terms such as “pre-emptive” when considering the invasion of Iraq, the Obama administration has shrouded it’s cyber policies in language that legally allows the military to go on the offensive – except this time the battle ground is cyberspace, which the Pentagon has defined as another military domain to be dominated.

The Washington Post even acknowledges that the Stuxnet virus was developed by the US in conjunction with Israel and was unleashed on Iran in 2010. Remarkably, however, it spins this fact on its head suggesting that “If an adversary should turn a similar virus against U.S. computer systems, whether public or private, the government needs to be ready to preempt or respond.”

As we initially

, the evidence suggested that the Stuxnet virus, designed to damage centrifuges at Iran’s nuclear facilities, was created and deployed by the US and Israel.

The idea was immediately branded a wild conspiracy theory by sections of the corporate media, who pinned the blame on Russia or China, before it was finally revealed in January 2011 by The New York Times that the wild “conspiracy theorists” were actually spot on.

The newspaper quoted intelligence and military experts as saying Israel has tested the effectiveness of the Stuxnet computer worm, which apparently shut down a fifth of Iran’s nuclear centrifuges in November and helped delay its ability to make its first nuclear weapons, reported AFP.

The virus caused extensive damage to the Bushehr reactor, leading to the risk of a new Chernobyl-style nuclear disaster, according to Russian officials.

In June of this year, it was revealed in a new book citing senior Washington sources that Stuxnet formed part of a “wave” of digital attacks on Iran code named “Olympic Games”. According to the anonymous officials, the virus was created with the assistance of a secret Israeli intelligence unit. It was Obama himself who gave the order to unleash the cyber attack on Iran. The president also decided not to shut the program down when it was known that it had been compromised.

Of course, the virus escaped onto the internet and has spread around the world, exposing the program. It was reported this week that large companies in the US, including Oil giants Chevron, saw their systems hit by Stuxnet. Computer experts believe that a “programming error” was responsible for the spread of the worm, yet many believe that a more sinister plot was afoot, such as a potential false flag operation, to be blamed on Iran, or an effort to corrupt the free internet.

The Washington Post also reported earlier this year, that the United States and Israel were also responsible for jointly developing the Flame virus, a huge malware assault that monitored Iran’s computer networks.

Researchers at Kaspersky Labs, announced that the Russian cyber security software company discovered a similarity between a subset of the code used in Flame and code used in the Stuxnet virus.

In September, it was revealed that three more new viruses had been created by the US and deployed in Lebanon and Iran to conduct espionage. Researchers working for both Kaspersky and Symantec separately discovered distinct similarities to Stuxnet and the closely related Flame virus.

The fact that these viruses have been pinpointed as potential threats to US government and private infrastructure, underscores the certainty that the US has sought to exploit the threat of cyber-attacks launched by their own cybersecurity departments.

We have seen a constant push by the executive and legislative branches to censor and regulate the Internet domestically in the name of cybersecurity.

Obama’s newly revealed “secret directive”, and his impending executive order on cybersecurity merely rubber stamp and continue the all out offensive that his administration and the intelligence and military outfits under his command have been pursuing for some time.

SOURCE

[bidulet]

So, in the name of cyber security, Obama and his administration wants to apply its censorship and national cyberparanoïa to all countries in the World and have all the powers on the Internet, monitor everything (communication) and prevent any kind of anonymity. I fear that the United States is really become a silent dictatorship.

I don't understand why the United States isn't in this article (https://en.wikipedia...rnet_censorship), they are clearly enemies of the Internet!

The use of highly secure VPN is now indispensable.

[Ambrocious]

It's less about America and MORE about Obama. You wanna know what Obama is all about, go to YouTube and watch "The Obama Deception" and "Fall of the Republic". It's not good news at all.

[DKT27]

Thing is, whole political system in the world is messed up. US politicians have more power hence, they make a mess of things more. Having said, power or not, US politicians do have an habit to put nose in things where they have no right to.

[myidisbb]

dont you all liek the good ol internet days of clinton 1995 and 2nd bush to 2006? last 6 years have sucked

[Janus]

Weren't you told not to spam your InfoWars conspiracy theory mental illness website spam as "news" on nsane? We get it already, Obama is an evil tyrant out to get freedom fighters like you and only you can reveal the great truths onto us like a noble holy warrior you are.

[Ambrocious]

Weren't you told not to spam your InfoWars conspiracy theory mental illness website spam as "news" on nsane? We get it already, Obama is an evil tyrant out to get freedom fighters like you and only you can reveal the great truths onto us like a noble holy warrior you are.

Why do you have such bitter hatred for the truth and the realities of what is happening in this earth? It is far beyond childish to snicker and poke fun at others who have open minds rather than narrow sighted minds. I would implore you to watch some of the things I post to completion rather than judge a book by it's cover. I appreciate your constructive criticism.

[Ambrocious]

Here is an update to this story:

Obama’s Secret Directive On Cybersecurity Prompts Lawsuit

Lawyers say ruling may enable “military deployment within the United States”

Steve Watson

Infowars.com

Nov 16, 2012

Lawyers with the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) have filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request (PDF) demanding that the Obama administration make public the text of a secret directive on cybersecurity, fearing that it could allow the military and intelligence agencies to operate on the networks of private companies, such as Facebook.

As we highlighted yesterday, a report in the Washington Post, cited several US officials saying that Obama signed off on the secret directive in mid-October.

“The new directive is the most extensive White House effort to date to wrestle with what constitutes an “offensive” and a “defensive” action in the rapidly evolving world of cyberwar and cyberterrorism.” the report states.

EPIC attorneys Amie Stepanovich and Ginger McCall say that Obama’s secret law may enable “military deployment within the United States” to oversee network security at communications companies such as AT&T and Comcast, social networks such as Facebook, and information centers like Google.

“We don’t know what’s in this policy directive and we feel the American public has the right to know.” McCall commented yesterday.

“The NSA’s cyber security operations have been kept very, very secret, and because of that it has been impossible for the public to react to them,” Stepanovich added. “[That makes it] very difficult, we believe, for Congress to legislate in this area. It’s in the public’s best interest, from a knowledge perspective and from a legislative perspective, to be made aware of what authority the NSA is being given.”

“Our concern is buttressed by an earlier FOIA request that we submitted, when [NSA Director] General Keith Alexander had been asked a few questions [during his confirmation hearing] that he did not answer publicly,” Stepanovich told news website Raw Story.

“He submitted answers in a private, classified supplement, which we also do not have publicly available. There was a question about the monitoring of private communication networks. Whatever answer he gave is not public, but it may implicate now what the NSA is attempting to do.” Stepanovich added.

As we noted in our report yesterday, the secret directive appears to also legally enable the US military and the NSA to use newly created computer viruses to attack any organisation or country deemed to be a cyber threat. Obama has already shown the willingness to carry out such attacks, as new details surrounding the 2010 stuxnet attack revealed earlier this year.

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham in England.

SOURCE

[nIGHT]

Weren't you told not to spam your InfoWars conspiracy theory mental illness website spam as "news" on nsane? We get it already, Obama is an evil tyrant out to get freedom fighters like you and only you can reveal the great truths onto us like a noble holy warrior you are.

C'mon! Respect man! I liked his post and I read most of it. Information true or not is still an information. I like to keep myself informed about anything too. If I find a topic or an issue I don't like I just skipped it. That is why topics are ramified, so you only read what interest you. But bashing someone like this is unacceptable. I am not picking a fight man but I can't stand someone disrespecting one member here who happens to be a valuable contributor of nice topics. I didn't judge you, maybe this is one "bad day" for you. but taking it out on Ambrocious is not cool man! NOT COOL!

Ambrocious answered back at your post politely, now he gains more respect and admiration from me. You are the better man Ambrocious! More civil than that someone. Peace!

I am grateful by your contributions here Ambrocious and I'll be reading more of what you share. ;)

Advance Merry X'Mas @Ambrocious :D