Jump to content

Diskeeper 12 (Sneak Peek)


Pedrito

Recommended Posts

Posted Image

Condusiv posted an image of the new Diskeeper 12 interface on their Facebook page. Check it out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 30
  • Views 5.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Oh Woa!

Amazing interface, really liked it. :D

I hope it get released not very late. ;)

Thanks for the article. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Looks awfull. Iobit style :lol:

Yeah, but it's much better than the current interface. :lol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites


If one looks at the latest Condusiv V12 and also the Photoshop CS6, one would observe a leaning towards a Windows 8 coloring backdrop; the darkish blue and honestly the eyes are led to believe that this new visual is looking good - I honestly believe it is better than the existing one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Tweety.Abd

I like the UI, but I hope they have a lighter skin, I don't really like dark colors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I like the new interface, and I like the dark colour. It's better for my eyes. :)

I hope the interface doesn't show repeated information like the other versions, and of course I hope the new version is better than ever! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Added a larger image and moved to Software Chat. I know it's news like, but it's not exactly a proper news article.

The UI feels better than the previous one. Honestly, Diskeeper in particular, I'm more concerned about what is going to improve in functioning backend than on the UI side. It has been a resource problem every time I installed it, something that I want to see changed in this version, in addition to defrag methods and effectiveness. In the end, what matters in disk defraggers is how well it performs. If one change I wanna see for UI is to see which file is placed where on the disk, something that current Diskeeper doesn't show as far as I remember.

I really thought they would rename the product too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You're right DKT27! I noticed that on the previous version(s), when it's defragmenting it has an impact on system performance, also the defragmentation wasn't the best. My programs weren't starting so fast like on some other versions before... Let's wait and see. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Technology

interface looks nice...It more looks like antivirus interface...Hope it works better then previous version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

You're right DKT27! I noticed that on the previous version(s), when it's defragmenting it has an impact on system performance, also the defragmentation wasn't the best. My programs weren't starting so fast like on some other versions before... Let's wait and see. :)

It took considerable amount of CPU while I was gaming or was browsing, slowing things down instead of improving system speed. Something that I want to happen when the computer is idle, not while it's being used. Other complain I have is that it just refused to defrag 2GB+ files no matter what settings were used. In addition to totally denying to defrag my C: drive. But anyway, I do expect it see something better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


hackerz14

i like the new interface and design... but since it is a hard disk utilities it should consider adding temperature monitoring and will stop defragging when a temp is too high and should also add smart attributes ! ! !

Link to comment
Share on other sites


StealthyBoi

You're right DKT27! I noticed that on the previous version(s), when it's defragmenting it has an impact on system performance, also the defragmentation wasn't the best. My programs weren't starting so fast like on some other versions before... Let's wait and see. :)

It took considerable amount of CPU while I was gaming or was browsing, slowing things down instead of improving system speed. Something that I want to happen when the computer is idle, not while it's being used. Other complain I have is that it just refused to defrag 2GB+ files no matter what settings were used. In addition to totally denying to defrag my C: drive. But anyway, I do expect it see something better.

Isnt there a option to chose how cpu it should use o3o?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


AlexKlein

@DKT27 and @Pedrito Diskeeper 12 includes our InvisiTasking technology, which performs defrag tasks using only idle resources. There's actually a live graph within the software that displays this. See here - http://www.condusiv....g/invisitasking

-Alex

Condusiv Technologies

Link to comment
Share on other sites


when can one expect diskeeper 12 alex?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Action > Configure Diskeeper > Diskeeper Configuration Properties... > Defragmentation Options > (scroll down) CPU Priority (Highest/High/Normal/Low/Lowest)

Please note, this applies to a manual pass only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You're right DKT27! I noticed that on the previous version(s), when it's defragmenting it has an impact on system performance, also the defragmentation wasn't the best. My programs weren't starting so fast like on some other versions before... Let's wait and see. :)

It took considerable amount of CPU while I was gaming or was browsing, slowing things down instead of improving system speed. Something that I want to happen when the computer is idle, not while it's being used. Other complain I have is that it just refused to defrag 2GB+ files no matter what settings were used. In addition to totally denying to defrag my C: drive. But anyway, I do expect it see something better.

To tweak the auto-defrag CPU resource:-

Action > Configure Diskeeper > Diskeeper Configuration Properties... > Defragmentation Options > Automatic Defragmentation Options > (check/enable) Efficient > (uncheck/disable) Consolidate directories on all volumes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


StealthyBoi
Action > Configure Diskeeper > Diskeeper Configuration Properties... > Defragmentation Options > (scroll down) CPU Priority (Highest/High/Normal/Low/Lowest)

Please note, this applies to a manual pass only.

What's manual pass ?.?
Link to comment
Share on other sites


SnakeMasteR

The interface looks ok but the icons, i used such icons for autoruns in multi-dvd's where some

games fit on and that was ages before. The icons are very ugly and should be replaced. :unsure:

This site is much better, the colors are ok.

Posted Image

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Action > Configure Diskeeper > Diskeeper Configuration Properties... > Defragmentation Options > (scroll down) CPU Priority (Highest/High/Normal/Low/Lowest)

Please note, this applies to a manual pass only.

What's manual pass ?.?
The 'pass' is PerfectDisk language for 'defragmentation.'

Manual pass = manual defragmentation. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites


StealthyBoi

Action > Configure Diskeeper > Diskeeper Configuration Properties... > Defragmentation Options > (scroll down) CPU Priority (Highest/High/Normal/Low/Lowest)

Please note, this applies to a manual pass only.

What's manual pass ?.?
The 'pass' is PerfectDisk language for 'defragmentation.'

Manual pass = manual defragmentation. :)

Oh i didnt no that thanks :D but i dont use manual pass I use auto pass :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites


@RocketMan I have the option "Efficient" unticked and Diskeeper still has a performance hit on my computer! -_-

Link to comment
Share on other sites


@RocketMan I have the option "Efficient" unticked and Diskeeper still has a performance hit on my computer! -_-

I'd try running Check Disk on the affected volume and if feasible excluding the executables from the security system. :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...