Jump to content
  • Seagate finds sets of two heads are cheaper than one in its new and very fast MACH.2 dual-actuator hard disks


    vissha

    • 3 comments
    • 1.2k views
    • 3 minutes
     Share


    • 3 comments
    • 1.2k views
    • 3 minutes

    Seagate finds sets of two heads are cheaper than one in its new and very fast MACH.2 dual-actuator hard disks

    Looks forward to nicely lowered costs as production ramps up, but they're still hyperscaler-only for now

    For about three years, disk-making giant Seagate has been talking up tech called “MACH.2” – a conventional disk drive that offers considerable speed improvements. And now the disk giant has found that the tech also cuts its costs, raising the prospect that big, fast, hard disk drives might emerge at keen prices.

     

    MACH.2 gets its speed by using two actuators – the twitchy little devices that move the arms carrying read/write heads to the parts of a disk’s platter that matter. While disks contain multiple platters and heads, they move all their arms at once and can only do one thing at a time with one arm. MACH.2 drives have two actuators, each driving arms and heads that address half of the platters in a disk and can do two things at once. They’re therefore pleasingly rapid.

     

    MACH.2 also offer pleasingly large capacities up to 20TB. That combination of speed and capacity has seen Microsoft buy up plenty of the Seagate’s early production run and put them to work in the Project Olympus servers it deploys inside the Azure cloud

     

    But MACH.2 is not yet a product the rest of us can go out and buy

     

    A recently surfaced transcript of a Seagate investor day, sighted by The Register, quotes senior veep Jeff Fochtman as saying MACH.2 is “really still in a technology-staging mode”. Despite that status the drives have a dozen customers and Seagate is ramping up production.

     

    Fochtman said that once MACH.2 hits 30TB it will offer an irresistible proposition “in many large datacenter environments.”

     

    He also dropped this nugget:

     

    Quote

    A notable benefit to dual actuator technology standardization is that it drastically cuts down test time, and therefore, hard drive production time is greatly reduced. This is a benefit we're looking forward to recognizing on the cost side of the business.

     

    When a vendor has a clear technology advantage, they charge a premium because they can and because they have a duty to shareholders. Hence Fochtman saying Seagate intends to essentially bank the cost benefits MACH.2 delivers.

     

    But once competition kicks in, prices usually fall. And when that happens, it will prove that two heads – or actuators – are better than one. ®

     

    Source

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    0 trust for Seagate the worst company of disk..

    IF you looking for cheap but still solid SSD check Crucial
    if you looking for very good disk pick Samsung Pro, evade EVO

    For nvme
    WD Black or better patrio viper

    About HDD
    WD red pro or ultrastar
    more cheap alternative hitachi or toshiba

    Check article about seagate.
    https://www.unifore.net/ip-video-surveillance/choose-hdd-for-video-surveillance-seagate-or-western-digital.html

    I have seagate which rip after 1 week
    now i have 4 samsung disk and 1 WD and all disk have 40-70k hours over 20TB overwrite about 6-12 years usage and still work great.

    image

    image
    image
    image

    Edited by Quilva
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    20 minutes ago, Quilva said:

    0 trust for Seagate the worst company of disk..

    IF you looking for cheap but still solid SSD check Crucial
    if you looking for very good disk pick Samsung Pro, evade EVO

    For nvme
    WD Black or better patrio viper

    About HDD
    WD red pro or ultrastar
    more cheap alternative hitachi or toshiba

    Check artivle
    https://www.unifore.net/ip-video-surveillance/choose-hdd-for-video-surveillance-seagate-or-western-digital.html

    WD also have similar issues. Seagate improved a lot after that. For years, people used Seagate before there is WD/Samsung/.... got expanded. There is still trust in Seagate.
    This is similar to Intel vs AMD. People trusted Intel. Now AMD shines and Intel fades.
    @QuilvaLet's keep our debate off. Everyone have different opinion on this topic. If you wanna share info, please share but not as a debate on this topic. Please share your views on the source site as comments.

    Edited by vissha
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Well nope.... wd make a bit lie to consumers and sold old technology HDD under name of new but you can figure out which disk use old and which new technology based on serial number, ID..

    Amd to intel its not same comparsion bc intel with amd fight for performance/price but amd even lates CPU had a lot problems..
    i have fanboy youtuber who hold finger for amd bc make better cpu and less price unfortunly its still amd and his cpu RIP 2 times in 1 year...
    and on some tech sites was info about amd cpu crash to offen...

    If you still dont belive there is cloud backup solution which use tons of disk and they share details which disk and how offen die in thier cloud solution
    https://www.backblaze.com/b2/hard-drive-test-data.html

    Edited by Quilva
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...