Jump to content
  • Brave, Vivaldi, and Mozilla reject Google's controversial "tracker" API

    Karlston

    • 248 views
    • 2 minutes
     Share


    • 248 views
    • 2 minutes

    Google's recent proposal for a Web Environment Integrity API has sparked controversy among developers and web companies. Many people argue that it gives Google and other major players too much control over access to the Web.

     

    Google's new API would allow websites to detect information about a user's operating system, browser, and other software to determine if the browser environment is "trusted."

     

    Brave CEO Brendan Eich has publicly denounced the API, calling it "junk that Google puts into Chromium." Vivaldi engineer Julien Picalausa has also spoken out against the proposal, warning that it gives decisive power to certain entities and goes against the principles of an open web.

     

    Mozilla engineer Brian Grinstead has echoed these concerns, stating that the proposal "contradicts our principles."

     

    Despite the backlash, Google engineers argue that the API would help advertisers better count ad impressions, prevent social media bot abuse, enforce copyrights, and secure financial transactions.

     

    The controversy surrounding the Web Environment Integrity API highlights the influence Google wields over web standards through its dominance of the Chromium browser engine.

     

    With a majority of browsers now based on Chromium, some argue that Google has too much unilateral control over the web platform. This could led Brave, Vivaldi and others to fork Chromium, removing Google services and APIs.

     

    The potential dangers of the Web Environment Integrity API are not just limited to the concentration of power in the hands of a few major players. It also raises concerns about privacy and security, as users could be forced to reveal sensitive information about their software and hardware configurations.

     

    Furthermore, the API could be used to limit access to certain websites or services, creating a two-tiered web where some users are denied access to certain content.

     

    It's still possible Google may reconsider its proposal and address the concerns of the community.

     

    Source


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...