Earlier this week, AMD announced its much anticipated Zen 4-based Ryzen 7000 series desktop CPU lineup. The Red team showed off several benchmarks of its Ryzen 9 7950X claiming performance advantage of up to 62% in certain scenarios compared to the Core i9-12900K. Speaking of the 12900K, AMD also touted that its $299 hexacore Ryzen 5 7600X chip is going to be better at gaming than the i9.
Today, some third-party benchmarks for the 7600X have leaked and it shows performance is about where AMD had claimed. The two benchmarks tested were Cinebench R23 and CPU-Z and both stock as well as overclocked states were measured. The testbench had decently fast DDR5-6000 memory.
Here is a compilation of the single-threaded results as this was the point of reference for the 12900K comparison:
Here are the screenshots of the results with Cinebench on the top row and CPU-Z on the row below:
The gains compared to the Ryzen 9 5950X here look un-impressive though the performance is pretty much in line with AMD's claims. According to the company, Zen 4 features a 9% IPC (instructions-per-cycle) improvement in Cinebench and a mere 1% improvement in CPU-Z.
On the multi-threaded side though the 7600X apparently does not come close to the 12900K. In fact it struggles to even surpass the i5-12600K as the 7600X only scores around 15,000 points, as per Wccftech.
What is impressive however is the performance of the Ryzen 9 7950X which apparently scores over 41,000 points and does so while reaching 82°C on an all-in-one (AIO) liquid cooler.
Source: 胆小鬼尹志平 (Bilibili) via @harukaze5719 (Twitter), Greymon55 (Twitter), Wccftech
AMD Ryzen 7950X and 7600X benchmarks suggest the latter isn't a 12900K killer by miles
Recommended Comments
There are no comments to display.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.