AMD Ryzen 7 9700X review: While Intel suffers setbacks, Team Red takes the mid-range gaming CPU crown

The mild multi-core bump from the Ryzen 7 7700X to the 9700X is more evident when compared with the older 5700X.

(Image credit: Windows Central | CPU Monkey)

 

AMD's efforts to achieve this multi-core performance at half the power of Intel's competing chips shouldn't be understated. A 40W base TDP drop from the previous-gen 105W Ryzen 7 7700X hasn't stopped the Ryzen 7 9700X from delivering a decent generational performance uplift, though it's certainly far from the significant leap AMD made from the 65W 5700X. Still, it's an impressive metric as AMD moves from Zen 4's 5nm manufacturing process to TSMC's 4nm and is part of an overall showcase in performance-per-watt improvements for the Ryzen 9000 Series.

 

These benchmarks reflect the Ryzen 7 9700X's 3.8GHz base frequency, another drop from the 105W Ryzen 7 7700X, which starts at 4.5GHz. Overclocking enthusiasts shouldn't worry, though, as the 9700X still boosts as high as 5.5GHz, slightly faster than the 7700X's 5.4GHz, despite the lower base power and maximum socket limits. Essentially, AMD can offer at least a minor bump to multi-core performance with the same 65W power draw that it used to, as it sticks with the AM5 socket until 2027 for potential upgrades to the top-end Ryzen 9 9950X following price drops.

Is the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X good for gaming?

Yes, absolutely. While it doesn't include AMD's 3D V-Cache aimed at gamers, the Ryzen 7 9700X still matches the previous-gen Ryzen 7 7800X3D, a powerhouse processor that has been all too easy to recommend as the best gaming CPU since its release. However, that shouldn't signal to gaming enthusiasts who adopted the Zen 4 -X3D chip that it's already time to upgrade. The performance improvements are marginal, so this serves as more of a temptation to those looking to upgrade from a Ryzen 5000 Series chip.

 

I still recommend the Ryzen 5 5600X to anyone building a budget gaming PC, and I run the Ryzen 7 5800X in my gaming desktop since it eventually dropped from its high MSRP. However, while it would mean a total motherboard upgrade from my AM4 range to a new AM5 equivalent compatible with the Ryzen 7 9700X, I can heartily recommend it as a perfect modern in-between for anyone in a similar situation as mine.

Ryzen 7 9700X: Single core performance

AMD mostly annihilates its competition in single-core performance, as the Ryzen 7 9700X shoots to the top of the pile with some of the best scores we've seen to date, save only for a CPU-Z result against Intel's 14th Gen i7-14700K. Given the lower physical core count of 8 on the 9700X compared to 20 on the 14700K, it's logical that each core can receive a higher share of wattage and offer stronger performance.

 

AMD wrestles the single-core crown away from Intel as the Ryzen 7 9700X challenges the 14th Gen i7-14700K in most CPU benchmarks.

If all cores were theoretically handling separate tasks equally, AMD would have the edge with a few more watts per core. It's another metric that will appeal to gamers, as single-core performance is usually a priority for many titles, though modern game engines can scale to multi-threaded options more effectively. Still, this bump to single-core performance is phenomenal, especially considering the Ryzen 7 9700X's mid-range position in the 9000 Series. If your suite of apps and games perform better with single-core optimizations, you'll love the 9700X.

Ryzen 7 9700X: The competition

If you're prepared to face potential issues, Intel has Core i5 and i7 alternatives in its 13th and 14th Gen.

(Image credit: Future)

 

AMD is launching the Ryzen 7 9700X and its entry-level sibling, the Ryzen 5 9600X, at the exact moment that Intel is experiencing an instability crisis with its 13th and 14th Gen Core desktop chips. While a microcode (firmware) patch is rolling out to compatible motherboards, there is still a risk that chips like the i7-13700K could be affected by an oxidization issue if manufactured in early 2023 before Intel had addressed it.

 

Ryzen 9000 chips weren't immune to launch problems, as AMD delayed the 9600X and 9700X to fix a production issue, which seemed to be little more than a model typo on the chips. Still, enthusiast PC builders who are comfortable updating their motherboard BIOS shouldn't be too wary of comparing the 9700X against its primary rivals, especially as Intel offers extended warranties and RMA assistance.

 

Even if the recent microcode bug controversy hadn't happened and Intel was on a level playing field with AMD, there is still the matter of performance-per-watt and the surrounding costs of adopting each processor. Internally, AMD pits the Ryzen 7 9700X against Intel's 14th Gen Core i7-14700K — that's a $359 65W AMD chip with 8 cores and 16 threads against a $409 125W Intel variant with 20 cores and 28 threads.

 

I can't comfortably recommend Intel's 13th or 14th Gen chips to anyone who isn't extremely comfortable with system tweaks and regular BIOS updates to avoid issues.

Based on performance benchmarking results, the Ryzen 7 9700X is more comparable to a mid-range Intel 13th Gen Core i5-13600K, which launched at $329 but can be found for as low as $249.99 at Best Buy. However, even with a saving of around $100, I can't comfortably recommend Intel's 13th or 14th Gen chips to anyone who isn't extremely comfortable with system tweaks and regular BIOS updates to avoid issues.

 

Hardcore gamers should wait for the inevitable -X3D variants of the Ryzen 9000 Series unless you're updating from a much older machine. Anyone with an AM5 socket board likely wouldn't see significant boosts in the 9700X from their Ryzen 7000 or even 8000G chips, but those on older AM4 socket boards can target the 9700X for a mid-range upgrade. Intel users on equivalent 12th Gen chips and earlier would need to upgrade their motherboards no matter what, but they should be happy with the 9700X.

Ryzen 7 9700X: Should you buy?

AMD still uses the ugly heat spreader pattern with the 9700X, but I'll give them a pass based on its performance. (Image credit: Ben Wilson | Windows Central)

You should buy this if ...

✅ Your apps need strong single-core performance

 

The Ryzen 7 9700X exhibits some of the best performance in single-core testing that I've ever seen, so it's great for many games and creative apps.

 

✅ You're building a mid-range gaming PC

 

Alongside a generous price drop from last gen, the 9700X offers better performance-per-watt over the Ryzen 7000 Series and is a new hot pick over the 5600X.

You should avoid this if ...

❌ You're a hardcore gamer targeting the best specs

 

AMD will, presumably and inevitably, release -X3D variants of the Ryzen 9000 Series chips, which would make more sense than the 9700X for a high-end gaming rig utilizing AMD's 3D V-Cache.

 

❌ You already have an equivalent Ryzen 7000 Series chip

 

While the 9700X has made a generational improvement on multi-core performance (and especially single-core), there isn't enough of a leap over the previous-gen Ryzen 7 7700X.

 

---

 

AMD delivers phenomenal single-core performance in what is otherwise a mid-range processor in its latest Ryzen 9000 Series of desktop chips, with a 'good enough' generational multi-core improvement. Still, a generous price drop from the previous Ryzen 7000 -X chips alongside a return to a 65W base TDP make this an extremely hot pick for mid-tier custom desktop builders looking for the best performance-per-watt, taking over from the Ryzen 5 5600X/7 5800X as my ultimate value-for-money picks.

 

Intel might be having a rough time with its 13th and 14th Gen chips exhibiting microcode issues, but that doesn't entirely put them out of the race. On the contrary, most comparable Intel Core desktop processors are unaffected or remedied with a simple BIOS update. However, these power-hungry 125W chips are finally knocked off their top spot for single-core scores and can't beat AMD's pricing for this gen. It's an outstanding display from Team Red and scores one of the easiest recommendations I've ever made.

 

Source

 

Hope you enjoyed this news post.

Thank you for appreciating my time and effort posting news every single day for many years.

2023: Over 5,800 news posts | 2024 (till end of July): 3,313 news posts