Jump to content
  • Microsoft slices Windows 11 update size by 40% (no, not by cutting hardware support)

    aum

    • 1 comment
    • 973 views
    • 2 minutes
     Share


    • 1 comment
    • 973 views
    • 2 minutes

    Show me the way to go home, I'm tired and I want to reverse this delta

     

    Microsoft is boasting of how it reckons to have reduced the size of Windows 11 updates. Surprisingly "cutting hardware support" didn't feature.

     

    The monthly cycle of fixes for Microsoft's wares has been the bane of many an administrator's life over the years. The operating system's decision to go for a lengthy lie-down at inopportune times while updates were being downloaded and applied have become something of a running joke, particularly with much of the world's move to remote working and occasionally iffy domestic internet connectivity.

     

    Microsoft began taking steps to address its package-size from the Windows 10 October 2018 Update (aka 1809) by using paired forward and reverse compression rather than the simple differential update of previous versions, which could get quite hefty and be painful to administer.

     

    While forward and reverse differentials addressed some of the woes associated with updates, issues remained and Microsoft recognised that the downloads could still be substantial. Particularly when one considers corporate infrastructure having to run via VPN to newly remote users who will still require updating, regardless of problematic bandwidth.


    For Windows 11, Microsoft tinkered with the process once again. Because of the need to be able to back out changes, a reverse delta (to reverse changes made) was required. However, rather than distribute a reverse delta, the company has realised that "transforms and patches can be 'observed' by the delta apply step, and efficiently re-encoded into a reverse delta". As such it has made a provision for a US patent application under the heading "REVERSE UPDATE DATA GENERATION" (no. 63/160,284).

     

    The approach has therefore meant the target device maintains its own path back to its original state, and Microsoft need only distribute the forward delta. The saving, according to Microsoft, is a 40 per cent reduction in update size.

     

    "This benefits our customer base who will need to download less to remain up-to-date and secure," boasted Microsoft.

     

    Far be it from us to suggest that Microsoft might turn its mighty intellect toward figuring out why it needs to ship so many patches in the first place. ®

     

    Source


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Three reasons I can think of off the top of my head why "so many patches" are required.

     

    First is that bugs are constantly found and fixed

    Secondly software exploits are constantly found and fixed

    Thirdly features are constantly requested and added.

    If you're employing programmers, might as well have them do something huh.

    For a laugh let's add a fourth cos someone is gonna say it anyway..

    Spoiler

    Microsoft sucks 😀

     

    Edited by Ryrynz
    The real reason
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...