Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are all ramping up open source work

Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are all ramping up open source work

Data shows interesting correlation between the contributions of tech giants

Three of the biggest technology companies in the world, Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, are tripping over each other in their bid to contribute to open source projects, new analysis has suggested.

According to open source data infrastructure company Aiven, the total number of active contributors to GitHub from the three companies saw a more than three-fold increase in five years. 

In absolute numbers, the total number of employees from these companies, which Aiven refers to as hyperscalers, increased from slightly under 3,000 in June 2016 to just short of 11,000 in June 2021.

“Our research has found that the hyperscalers are committing more staff than ever to open source software projects. Not only is open source software a lynchpin in modern cloud computing, but it is also a way to win hearts and minds of developers. This is clear by the number of contributors coming from the hyperscalers,” said Heikki Nousiainen, Aiven’s co-founder and CTO.

Going up or down?

A breakdown of the contributions reveal a couple of interesting trends. 

For one, while Amazon still lags behind Microsoft and Google, recent initiatives such as OpenSearch, the open source fork of ElasticSearch, along with a host of other open source projects, will continue to push up its profile. 

So even as Amazon’s GitHub commits increase by 20% year-on-year, Microsoft’s has plateaued, and Google’s has surprisingly dropped by around 10%. 

However, Nousiainen doesn’t believe that the reduction in the number of commits from Google means the search engine giant is wavering in its commitment to open source.

“...it’s been an exceptional year, and Google has championed open source since its early days. It’s most likely a result of the increased maturity of its open source projects combined with the turbulence of the past year,” believes Nousiainen.

Source