Jump to content
  • 2022 Linux Desktop Environments System Usage (Gnome, KDE, XFCE, LXQT, Cinnamon, Mate) under Fedora 37

    aum

    • 529 views
    • 4 minutes
     Share


    • 529 views
    • 4 minutes

    Over the years I've seen a lot of poorly made comparisons of Linux Desktop Environments in terms of system usage and in this article I want to make things right once and for all.

     

    Let's start with a methodology which absolutely needs to be defined because we want reproducible results, not something which is random and user dependent.

     

    • For testing Fedora spins are used - you can find download links below in the comparison table. Fedora normally offers quite fresh if not the freshest software - we need something which is relevant as of now, December 2022, not December 2012.
    • Post installation the system will be fully upgraded and rebooted - that's how users will run it anyways.
    • Tests will be performed under a VM, VirtualBox 6.1.40. Why? People's hardware varies greatly, it's impossible to predict whether your system has a fast dedicated GPU or a built-in one. This could result in different RAM/VRAM usage patterns. VirtualBox 7.0 will not be used as it's still considered beta quality software.
    • A VM will get a 16GB disk drive, a four-core vCPU, 128MB of VRAM and 4096MB of RAM running at 1920x1080@24bit resolution. SWAP will not be used as it behaves unpredictably.
    • Gnome and KDE will be tested under Wayland and Xorg. All other DEs will be running under the Xorg server, i.e. in pure X11 mode.
    • To assess the system RAM use without a desktop environment running, the system will be booted into IceWM which has a very miminal footprint yet offers a sort of usable graphical environment.
    • Once logged in, default file manager and terminal emulatar applications will be started and that's it. Most users use both a lot, while it's hard to assess what other applications are common.
    • Disk buffers will be flushed using echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches. Why? Because they may never be re-used. We need to assess the actual RAM use.
    • What none of the existing/previously made comparisons have taken care of is disk IO use for DEs. I will use VirtualBox Session Information feature to get this data 60 seconds after booting into a particular desktop environment.
    • Desktop environments are used as is without any modifications or additions. For instance, KDE Plasma Add-ons (plasmoids) inflate RAM usage even further. KDE is already the biggest resource hog.

     

    Without further ado and half an hour youtube videos full of nothing here's the data in MB (megabytes):

     

    DE RAM Used RAM Shared Buffers Disk Read*
    KDE Xorg 1511 45 536 904
    KDE Wayland 1487 71 454 910
    Gnome Wayland 1422 12 341 834
    Gnome Xorg 1355 31 364 846
    Cinnamon 858 46 328 785
    Mate Compiz 624 17 226 699
    XFCE 597 13 224 732
    LXQT 491 28 250 739
    IceWM (baseline) 271 1 189 -

     

    * - the amount of data read starting from a cold boot to a desktop environment, including a file mananager and graphical terminal emulator.

     

    Whoever doubted XFCE as a lean desktop environment is I hope dissuaded and changed their mind.

     

    Overall if you are a user of KDE and Gnome you must be looking at the very least 4GB of RAM though modern web browser eat RAM for breakfast so 6GB or even 8GB of RAM sound a lot more desirable.

     

    This doesn't sound like a lot of work but I've spent a full day downloading ISO images, installing and updating spins, collecting the data and presenting it. Donatations are impossible considering I live in Russia but at least consider Google Ads on this page. Thank you.

     

    If you need raw data you could download the source image files (zip archive, ~1MB).

     

    P.S. KDE under Wayland was very unstable. On every second boot I couldn't launch any applications after logging in. This could be an issue with VirtualBox though. Gnome worked flawlessly.

     

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     

    © 2022 Artem S. Tashkinov. Last revised: December 12, 2022. The most current version can be found here.

     

    All rights reserved. You can reproduce the entire text verbatim, and you must retain the authorship and provide a link to this document.

     

    Source


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...