Jump to content
  • Google slams Linux kernel, says it needs major security investment

    aum

    • 1 comment
    • 397 views
    • 2 minutes
     Share


    • 1 comment
    • 397 views
    • 2 minutes

    Downstream vendors should allocate more resources to the upstream kernel, suggests Google

     

    Google has highlighted what it says are shortcomings in the Linux kernel from a security perspective, and the issues these create for downstream vendors who roll the kernel into products.

     

    In a blog post, Kees Cook from Google’s Open Source Security Team compares the Linux kernel to the US automotive industry of the 1960s in order to drive home the point that while the kernel runs flawlessly, when it fails, it falls apart miserably.

     

    “The huge community surrounding Linux allows it to do amazing things and run smoothly. What's still missing, though, is sufficient focus to make sure that Linux fails well too,” wrote Cook.

     

    Cook states he believes the problem is two-pronged. First, Linux needs to invest to make sure its code is robust, which will ensure that bugs don’t manifest at the rate that they do currently. But when they do, they should also be handled in a more efficient manner than the current arrangement.

     

    Calling all downstream vendors


    Sharing the “sobering” statistics, Cook says that the stable bug-fix only release of the kernel comes out with about 100 new fixes every week. This leaves downstream vendors with three choices; either to ignore all fixes, prioritize the “important” ones, or apply them all.

     

    Highlighting the issues with all three strategies, he says that the only real option, from a security point of view, is to apply all fixes. This option however presents an engineering nightmare for vendors.

     

    Instead Cook suggests that rather than individual vendors applying the fixes, greater onus should be laid on increasing upstream collaboration. He suggests various mechanisms including introducing more automated testing, continuous integration, and other steps to streamline the kernel’s development process.

     

    “Instead of testing kernels after they're released, it's more effective to test during development,” suggests Cook, asking downstream vendors to infuse at least a 100 more engineers to work on the upstream kernel.

     

    Source

    • Like 2

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...