Jump to content
  • Daily Telescope: Pumping up the volume with the Headphones nebula

    Karlston

    • 255 views
    • 2 minutes
     Share


    • 255 views
    • 2 minutes

    "I liked the object so much I decided to give it a try."

    Headphones-Final-800x525.jpg

    A view of the "Headphones" nebula.
    Bill McLaughlin

     

    Welcome to the Daily Telescope. There is a little too much darkness in this world and not enough light; a little too much pseudoscience and not enough science. We'll let other publications offer you a daily horoscope. At Ars Technica, we're going to take a different route, finding inspiration from very real images of a universe that is filled with stars and wonder.

     

    Good morning. It is November 7, and today's photo brings the "Headphones nebula" into brilliant clarity. The origin of this name seems rather obvious, no?

     

    This is a planetary nebula, and I well remember studying these as an astronomy major decades ago. Why? Because the name is so damn confusing. Planetary nebula are formed when dying stars—including our own Sun one day—expand and form a glowing shell of ionized gas. They were given the name "planetary" nebula because, when first observed by astronomers about 250 years ago through rudimentary telescopes, they looked somewhat like planets.

     

    The name stuck.

     

    The formal name of the Headphones Nebula is Jones-Emberson 1, which was discovered in 1939 by Rebecca Jones and Richard Emberson. The central star in the image is a "white dwarf" star that is actually blue. Because, astronomy.

     

    Amateur astronomer Bill McLaughlin told me he captured this image with his 14-inch Planewave CDK telescope from SkiesAway remote observatory in California in March and April 2023. The total exposure time was 19.25 hours, and the resulting image was composed from 127 sub-exposures.

     

    "In this case the inspiration was an Astrobin image of the day taken earlier this year, albeit by a team of imagers using a one-meter professional-level scope," he said. "Still, although I was doing this by myself and with a good but much more modest system, I liked the object so much I decided to give it a try. Of course, my result doesn't match that from a professional level system, but overall, I was pretty happy with the result."

     

    As well he should be.

     

    Source: Bill McLaughlin.

     

    Source


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...